Note: This essay was first posted on Oct 1, and was “sticky” for several days. Scroll down for a video from OSCE Warsaw, report on the problems caused by Roma migrants in Sweden, three more interventions from this week’s OSCE conference in Warsaw, an MSM hit piece on PEGIDA, and other more recent posts.
Below is the second part of Max Denken’s analysis of the multiculti nightmare that is currently engulfing Europe. This installment pays special attention to Germany.
20 August 2015: Europe’s aging population watching the arrival of its successors and future masters at the Greek island of Kos, a few days after 1,500 such ‘migrants’, mostly arrived on rubber dinghies from nearby Turkey, rioted on that island. (Daily Mail, 20.08.2015)
A month later: The queue outside the Berlin Office of Health and Social Affairs. German altruists in the upper right corner (Daily Mail, 26.09.2015)
A Nightmare, Reborn
Part 2 of 3
by Max Denken
The two countries that have been animating the European Union also power, since the 1950s, Europe’s drowning-by-Muslims, the refugee tsunami included. They are France and Germany.
Their pre-peoplehood enmity was noted already by Julius Caesar. Perhaps they now share a benign view of grafting Islamic hordes onto Europe because they devastated each other directly or by proxy for over 150 years of internecine Christian religious wars begun in the early 16th century. In modern times, they went at it in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71, World War I and World II, after which they decided that the only way to bury the hatchet was to integrate in a pan-European entity and draw in the rest of the continent with them.
Unique pathologies have developed over that long history. France is to European history what the writer Spengler called in a 2003 article, “the sacred heart of darkness.” Spengler referred solely to French delusions of mystical grandeur that perhaps started with Cardinal Richelieu’s spymaster, Father Joseph du Tremblay. Fr. Joseph was convinced that France was God’s instrument for the salvation of humanity, hence justifying any and all means for the attainment of her “noble” goals. This led to France playing both sides in Europe’s religious wars; for instance first a mass murder of its own Huguenots, and then financing Protestant Sweden in its war on Catholic Central Europe.
But what is one to make of the French Revolution? Apart from the horrors it inflicted on France, it is the mother of communism and socialism, state terror and the citizen as the state’s servant, hundreds of million dead in a little over 200 years, militant secularism and the fraudulent cult of equality. Then came Napoleon and submerged Europe in a sea of blood under the slogan Liberté, égalité, fraternité.
In our times, France has been the architect of the Muslim invasion of Europe ever since opening its borders, under de Gaulle, to millions of North African Arabs. France has been the instigator of Eurabia, metamorphosed of late as the hopefully-named Mediterranean Co-prosperity Sphere. France is where pogroms of Jews and cartoonists are the norm, Marseille might as well be in Morocco, 1,000 infidels’ cars are torched each year as a Muslim celebration of the Winter Holiday, and productive citizens pay a 75% marginal income tax rate while half of France’s at-least 7 million Muslims live on public welfare. France sued Brigitte Bardot five times for “inciting racial hatred,” and is now suing Marine Le Pen for “racism” because she criticizes the vast expanse of upturned Muslim posteriors occupying many a public square and church plaza in her country five times a day. It’s that France that’s now pushing suicide-by-Muslim-refugees on the whole of Europe.
But Germany is the more interesting case.
Deutschland schafft sich ab
When the German politician, financial expert and member of the Executive Board of Germany’s Bundesbank (central bank) Thilo Sarrazin published his book Deutschland schafft sich ab (“Germany abolishes itself”), he became an instant pariah to the ruling elite and a folk hero to the common serfs. Sarrazin lost his job with the Bundesbank, his position in the Social Democratic Party, his social standing, his friends, and probably some family too. Germany’s mass media and politicians crucified him virtually and would have, if they could, done so physically as well.
But why? Even the liberal-left Der Spiegel itself that called Sarrazin “The Man Who Divided Germany” (it’s never the Progressive saboteurs who “divide”) acknowledged that his conclusions about the failed integration of Muslim immigrants are “beyond any doubt,” And that is already at least one level off from the truth, which is that to have expected “integration” from imported products of ancient, hostile barbarism was, and continues to be, the essence of lunacy itself.
Frau Bundeskanzlerin Merkel called Sarrazin’s conclusions “absurd” and assumed the facial rictus of one force-fed live maggots when she as much as heard his name mentioned in TV interviews. And that was before all hell broke loose because Sarrazin speculated that the Jews’ high degree of intelligence is due to a shared gene, i.e. inheritability.
German media erupted in an uproar about the “disgusting realm of race theory,” “shadow of Hitler” and so on. The Central Council of Jews in Germany — -typically for the progressively demented Jewry of our times — condemned Sarrazin in the strongest terms. The funny thing is that Sarrazin based his remark on a paper by an Israeli geneticist, Gil Azmon, “Abraham’s Children in the Genome Era: Major Jewish Diaspora Populations Comprise Distinct Genetic Clusters with Shared Middle Eastern Ancestry.”
One of the few important people who came to Sarrazin’s defense sought to explain this madness by stating that Germany was overshadowed by its Holocaust history. There is something to it and it’s obvious, but the whole is much wider, and it’s buried deep inside.
First, to put it bluntly, it’s the worthiness of the deal: murdering 6 million European Jews and importing in their stead what will very soon be 6 going-on-10 million West Asian and African Muslims in Germany alone. A former French government minister, Patrick Devedjian, hinted at that when he said, recently: “Germany took our Jews and gave us Arabs.” Poignant, though France gave up its Jews willingly and replaced them with Arabs willingly, too.
A fuller “profit-loss” reckoning transpired when an anonymous Spanish poet wrote in 2010 in a poem widely reproduced on the Internet:
Europa murió en Auschwitz. Nosotros asesinamos a seis millones de judíos para acabar importando 20 millones de musulmanes. En Auschwitz quemamos la cultura, la inteligencia y la capacidad de crear… el resultado de relajar fronteras …el absurdo pretexto de la tolerancia han sido estos 20 millones de musulmanes, a menudo analfabetos y fanáticos. Hemos cambiado a la cultura, por el fanatismo la capacidad de crear riqueza, por la voluntad de destruirla . A la inteligencia, por la superstición…. Hemos cambiado el orgullo de sobrevivir, por la obsesión fanática por morir, y de paso matarnos a nosotros y a nuestros hijos. ¡Que error que hemos cometido!
[My inexpert translation: “Europe died in Auschwitz. We assassinated 6 million Jews in order to end up importing 20 million Muslims … In Auschwitz we burnt the culture, intelligence and power to create … As the result of relaxing borders … the absurd pretext of tolerance… we have 20 million Muslims (and millions more now), mostly illiterate and fanatical. We exchanged culture for fanaticism, the capacity to create wealth for the will to destroy, intelligence for superstition. We exchanged the pride of survival for the fanatical obsession to die, killing us and our children in the process. What a mistake we have made!”]
2015: Germans smile and greet Muslim ‘refugees’ as they arrive at the main train station in Munich (The Telegraph, Photo: Corbis)
1935: Germans smile and look on as three German-Jewish businessmen are forced to march down Bruehl Strasse in Leipzig, carrying signs that read, “Don’t buy from Jews. Shop in German businesses!” (Photo credit: William Blye Collection, courtesy of USHMM Photo Archives)
Standard social psychology theory of cognitive dissonance and internal justification predicts that Germany’s political and intellectual elites would seek to deny the consequences of their Muslims-for-Jews “trade.” Let alone, when their own power and fate among their countrymen depend on the force of that denial. Accordingly, they chant as one the mantra that imported Muslims are Germany’s salvation.
When the earlier trickle turned into a burst dam, Angela Merkel voiced her expectation that “refugees” will be future employees of German auto makers. Her Economy Minister Sigmar Gabriel said that “migrants” will solve Germany’s major economic problem: its skills shortage. Yes, of course, pending such minor obstacles as acculturating and training in 21st century procedures aggressively pre-medieval Muslim men. And Jens Weidmann, the president of the Bundesbank, repeated the refrain that Germany will be stronger if it integrates the refugees and other immigrants successfully. Sheikh Muhammad Ayed agreed with them all at a speech he gave at the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Take our workers, old, decrepit Europe, he said, so that we can breed with you, trample you underfoot and incorporate you in the Caliphate.
Galina Ivanova, a Russian woman who grew up in Kazan among Muslims and now lives and works in Munich, kept a diary from January through August 2015 in which she recorded the bizarre goings on. She relays that already in January 2015, Bundestag politicians were touting the “strong arms, designed to save the German economy.” Preference was given to young Muslims from Africa and the Middle East. Any doubt about the viability of such a scheme was being muffled with accusations of “racism” and “Islamophobia.”
Since a similar suicidal scenario is foisted on the local serfs all over Western Europe, the Eurocrat nomenklatura’s very future is dependent on defending it by all means necessary. And so, the EU commissioner responsible for migration offered the trope that “Europe will need a big number of skilled workers,” and the Vice President of the European Central Bank echoed that immigrants can stop Europe’s ‘demographic suicide.’ Both gentlemen failed to specify correctly what kind of immigrants and from where might provide such skilled labor and stop the “suicide,” but their jobs are too posh to lose over such trifles as the truth. And The Economist applauded all that in the headline, “Europe should welcome more refugees and economic migrants — for the sake of the world and itself.”
Indeed. Let’s examine that in light of recent headlines — again, for the sake of future archeologists. They may one day serve as shards of German porcelain found in mounds of detritus of the people who supplanted the Germans, just as the remains of Christianity are nowadays found under 18 feet of mud in Turkey.
1. Economic reality check
Just for 2015, per German Federal Ministry of the Interior forecasts reported in the press, German taxpayers’ costs for the initial absorption of “refugees” will be 10 billion euros ($11 billion). That’s on the basis of 800,000 “refugees,” though as this has already morphed into 1,000,000, the German people ought to reckon with a hit of about 12.5 billion euros to their collective paycheck and indebtedness. For this year alone, with large non-direct costs omitted and an inestimably large detonation of Germany’s social capital — all that careening downslope into the future per the “unlimited” flow of “refugees” solicited by Frau Merkel’s government.
What are the prospects that ‘migrants’ would contribute enough in taxes to offset that, let alone to create a surplus to take care, according to the ruling elite’s fondest dreams, of Germany’s aging autochthon population?
In a 05 June 2014 interview, Der Spiegel queried the demographics expert Reiner Klingholz about his study, “New Potential.” Klingholz had presented a cheerful image: even as Germany is becoming a “country of immigration,” German companies are attracting immigrants who are “better qualified than the domestic population.” It transpired in the interview that those were immigrants from Southern Europe that Dr. Klingholz had referenced. He disclosed that only one in four children of Turkish immigrants graduates from high school — that’s a real high school still, not the softened variety known in mixed white-black societies — versus 43% for Germans. Of course, being an academic and a German, Dr. Klingholz then went on to blame Turkish Germans’ underemployment on “discrimination in the job market”.
The Central Foreigners Register is German enough to know with precision that of the 400,000 Romanians and Bulgarians who live in Germany only 7% are unemployed (6.4% is the national figure) and 10% receive welfare (Der Spiegel, Jan. 2014). These figures and those of Polish immigrants’ participation in the labor force are cited by officials and their media stooges to prove how Germany benefits from immigration.
But try to find the employment and welfare ratios either at the Federal Register or at the Statistisches Bundesamt for the Turks, Somalis, Afghans, Sudanese, Iraqis, Syrians and other Muslims who live in Germany; disclosing such would lead to comparison with the Eastern Europeans. That would lead to “racist” conclusions and Germans would rather be dead than racist, just as not so long ago they were industrial-scale butchers of people in preference to being non-racist. But there is data from elsewhere that may be applied to Germany.
The Munich-based Center for Economic Studies informs in a 20.09.2015 report that the illiteracy rate “even among” the 14-24 age group is 4% for Syria, 18% for Iraq, 34% for Nigeria and 53% for Afghanistan — therefore, the “‘refugees” are poorly prepared for the German labor market, and Germany will have to “invest” not only in language courses for them but “training” as well.
One who knows the iterated countries and whose job does not depend on the expression of this opinion might say at this point, “Good luck with that training.” In Great Britain, reported Migration Watch UK in 2009 with hilarious understatement, ”Somali, Bangladeshi, Pakistani and Iranian immigrants are likely to be 81%, 56%, 55% and 48% economically inactive respectively.”
To add mirth to the good cheer expressed by the leaders and opinion makers of Germany, CES relays that “Many refugees will remain in Germany in the long-term and bring their relatives into the country,” and “Migratory pressure from North Africa and the Middle East will remain high.” And then the happy conclusion: “The supposed immediate integration of immigrants into the German labour market does not stand to benefit the German economy.”
Compare that to Der Spiegel’s happy headline of 27.08.2015: “Rx for Prosperity: German Companies See Refugees as Opportunity.”
Meanwhile, until they start operating the super-modern factories of Siemens and Volkswagen, cheering for Bayern München with beer-sloshed work buddies, marrying nice, blonde fräuleins and raising lovingly a brood of good German children, the ‘migrants’ have already bestowed further blessings on Germany and Europe since we visited with them on 17 September.
2. Crime Report
Already in late August, riots erupted in a refugee camp in Suhl, in Thuringia, because an Afghani ‘migrant’ tore pages from the Koran. That led to an attack by some 50 enraged ‘migrants’ armed with iron bars and stones on police that came to restore order. Seventeen people were injured, including at least four policemen, As well, the “refugees” ransacked buildings and demolished walls in their German refuge, and smashed car windows.
17 September 2015, a future skilled German worker by the name of Rafik Mohamad Yousef severed an ankle monitor he’d been ordered to wear after a 2004 assassination plot and 2008 conviction for belonging to a terrorist organization. Mohamad then went out on a Berlin street and started threatening passersby. When police arrived, he stabbed a policewoman in the neck and was shot and killed by her colleague who, accidentally, also shot the policewoman. For this, for the cost of importing and subsidizing that refuse of Asia since years before 2004, for the threats of decapitation he’s made to a German judge and Immigration workers, Mama Merkel, as she is called by ‘migrants’, did not apologize.
The number of “Islamic extremists” in Germany had grown by 400 since June and is now 7900 according to German domestic intelligence (BfV) statement on 22 September. The BfV also voiced its concern that “Islamists” in Germany are recruiting among asylum-seekers. Some morning police raids were even carried out in Berlin, but it’s hard to understand why all this concern. After all, German intelligence also disclosed that of the 740 “Islamists” who had left Germany to join jihadists in Syria and Iraq, about one-third have returned. No doubt, to draw welfare benefits, hang out at the mosque with comrades and in discos with infidel tarts, and to groom some young German flesh, male and female. Yesterday there, here today; what’s the big deal?
Galina Ivanova’s diary offers a peek at life in Multiculti Germany. Her entry for 5 March, 2015:
“The integration of refugees is proceeding at mind-spinning speed. The truth does not lie where naïve burghers expected it [snip]. Data sources are unofficial but I can vouch myself for information about more frequent home robberies and assaults on Germans, maltreatment of women of all ages, purse-snatching, narcotics crimes, road accidents with the participation of African cyclists, and especially theft in stores. Germans’ reaction: “What can you expect? They live off welfare! These unfortunates simply have no other choice!” Yesterday during my son’s competition for the first time in ten years they robbed the students’ locker room. Money, smart phones, tablets…. Police has not opened an investigation on the basis of the new decree about ignoring “small crimes.”
She adds on 14 August:
“And what’s happening in the places of rich German culture (that’s a quote from Merkel)! The Police practically never leaves: brawls, knife fights, rapes (what is happening in the toilets and showers is indescribable: all around excrement, even traces of dirty fingers wiped on the walls). There is discussion in the press: how to force refugees to clean up their own excrement? Germans are unable to understand that these people will not clean it up. And they have not in their entire lives, for generations.”
The reality that’s being forced onto German women by a wave upon wave of young, sex-deprived and white-women crazed Muslim barbarians cannot be apprehended fully, as Germany’s entire ruling establishment keeps the cover on tight. But that reality may be reconstructed from occasional fragments, and from personal testimony.
Galina Ivanova’s entry for 20 May 2015:
“Yesterday, the harassment of women began. Africans, with all their insolent frankness propose “love and friendship,” and if a woman is outraged, they beat her up. They can simply kill: a few days ago a 34-year-old “refugee” from Africa stabbed a 48 years old woman from the city Lesum. It’s becoming more and more interesting in Germany. I thought that I saw the worst in the 90s, but no. Yesterday in the park, two blacks raped a 34-year-old woman. You can no longer jog by yourself. It’s dangerous to go out at night. Everybody is acquiring pepper spray. Now we have security forces not only in swimming pools, water parks and beaches, but in the entire state transportation system, in every street car. The official version: [it’s] protection against the neo-Nazis.”
Ivanova’s diary contains several related entries, for instance on 26 April: “A well known publishing house got ‘smacked on the head’ for the line: ”Six men raped a female student in a schoolyard; these were Arab immigrants speaking a foreign language.” That may be anecdotal, but Gatestone Institute’s “Germany: Migrants’ Rape Epidemic” by Soeren Kern brings the resources of a professional research organization to reveal a tale of a ‘rape-by-Muslim-migrant’ pandemic, with two dozen referenced cases of individual and gang rape, and a whole system of horrific, normalized rape in multiple “refugee” shelters.
Kern cites the hypocrisy of the German state in all this. On the one hand, “Police are refusing to go public about crimes involving refugees and migrants because they do not want to give legitimacy to critics of mass migration.” On the other, “Police (snip)…. issued a warning to parents not to allow their children to go outside unaccompanied… [or for] women not to walk to or from the train station alone.”
Another Gatestone article, “Migration Crisis: Germany Wants to Be ‘Miss Congeniality’ And Have Europe Pick Up the Tab“ (Vijeta Uniyal, 20.9.2015), quotes ZDF (public TV) editor-in-chief’s defense of suppressing a rape-by-’migrant’ story: “We don’t want to inflame the situation and spread the bad mood. [The migrants] don’t deserve it.”
Pastor Ulrich Wagner proposed the employment of prostitutes (at taxpayers’ expense, it goes without saying in Germany) to provide ”sexual aid” to ‘migrants’ and so alleviate German women’s fears (Münchner Merkur 08.03.15). In a country as crazed as Germany that may not be a bad idea. Remember, however, all those millions of eager Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya dishes throughout Dar al-Islam, with average annual household incomes from $100 to $1,000 and a few hundred million young Muslim sex-deprived males dreaming of all the free goodies, fornication, and eager jizya offered by the nice people of Germany.
4. Expropriation of Germans
Germany has begun a gradual confiscation of real estate from Germans in order to house the future “Germans” and their large brood.
Demand for housing is going to exceed supply for many years to come. Every possible public building is being repurposed. Now even high school kids and their teachers are being evicted from their classrooms (Jahn-Realschule in Lübbecke), Luftwaffe bases are turned into “refugee” dorms (Erding), and 400 Bundeswehr soldiers have been kicked out of their barracks in Klietz and placed in tents for the next two years, to make room for 700 “refugees”. But all that is just fingers in a ruptured dike.
Already on 5 February Sueddeutsche Zeitung hinted at what’s to come in a headline ”Senioren sollen große Wohnungen aufgeben“ (Seniors should give up their large apartments). In Berlin, reported the Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung on 25.9.2015, the Green-Red ruling coalition has confiscated vacant “luxury apartments” whose owners receive monthly rent set by the confiscators. The city’s better addresses may contain 5,000 currently unoccupied dwellings subject to the confiscation. In addition, Berlin’s Senate has been seizing large commercial real estate properties. Hamburg, too, is planning forced rentals and confiscation of commercial properties.
The already-overpopulated region of North Rhine-Westphalia must absorb at least 176,000 ‘migrants’ this year, based on a mandatory allocation of the anticipated 800,000 “refugees” (now it’s 1,000,000), but there are no suitable accommodations for them. Cities such as Dortmund and Gelsenkirchen are therefore broaching confiscation of private properties that bureaucrats deem susceptible, e.g. if they are off the market for whatever reason (WDR-TV Internet page, 27.8.2015).
German low-income renters have no choice at all. Already in 2014, local initiatives were opting for eviction of German tenants and their replacement with “refugees.” Per reports from MDR (Central-German Broadcast Network), in towns like Braunsbedra and Merseburg, BIH, an outfit with a district-wide license for “care and integration of refugees,” was taking over (buying, apparently) apartment blocks, evicting near-indigent German tenants and cramming in African and other ‘migrants’. It appears that, for each refugee, BIH is being paid 235 euros by the Saal county (MDR 01.04.2015) and 317 euros rent paid by the Social Welfare Office (MDR 10.24.2014), with the density ratio as high as four tenants in a 16-square-meter room, i.e. total revenue to BIH of over 2200 euro per month from a low-quality living space the size of a suburban German family’s garage. Now the local municipality in Nieheim has made even the British press (The Telegraph) by terminating the leases and evicting German tenants from state-owned apartment buildings, in order to turn them into ‘migrant’ accommodations.
This massive expropriation is proceeding at such speed that just a couple of days after I completed the above section based on scans of the German press, Gatestone’s Soeren Kern came out with a 5000-word article, Germany: Migrants In, Germans Out (27.09.2015) citing an erosion of property rights that had progressed much further and farther.
Among others, in Hamburg, things have “progressed” to a parliamentary bill to confiscate by force vacant commercial real estate whose owners are not cooperating otherwise. After all, 400 ‘migrants’ arrive in Hamburg daily, and no space is left in the existing refugee shelters. In Tübingen, Mayor Boris Palmer (Green Party), is promising to go the Hamburg way if vacant property owners do not submit voluntarily. So between halting the migrants’ flow and halting the spread of fascism in Germany, the choice is to let fascism flow.
5. Religious tolerance
The major German newspaper Die Welt published a report on 27.09.15 under the title Religionskonflikt; Islamisten bedrohen Christen in Flüchtlingsheimen. If we translate the last word as ”refugee camps,” the meaning of the rest of the title is inferable by anyone ignorant of German but as-yet untouched by the epidemic of white-race-specific cognitive spongiform encephalitis (my neologism).
What the Muslims are doing to Christians and Yazidis in those refugee camps, and between Sunni, Shias, Afghanis, Kurds etc., is not a focal point for us. It’s just the standard brawls and beatings, threats of murder, gestures of slitting the throat, shouting Quranic verses that usually accompany decapitations, emoting with lyric Muslim poetry like “We will kill you and drink your blood.”
More significant is what a whole panoply of German “experts” are saying. They recommend that the refugees should be separated by religions. They want to formulate a “German mission statement” about “the fundamental values of democracy and a pluralistic society” and a subsequent “orientation aid for refugees.” They recommend “Affiliate guidance tailored to the country of origin.” They speak of “forthcoming integration issues,” “socio-political visions” and “future-oriented concepts.” They call for a “higher model” for the Germans with which the refugees can identify — and must (my emphasis). They affirm emphatically that “Particularly intense religious Muslims must learn to live with other religions.”
The only thing they are not saying is that importing the Muslims was an egregiously lunatic idea in the first place, and the only remedy for it is to ship them back whence they came.
Locusts and Lemmings
104,460 “refugees” arrived in Germany in August, for a total of 413,535 and still over half a million to go, according to the Merkel government’s fondest wishes. At least 80% are Muslim (Soeren Kern at Gatestone Inst., citing the Central Council of Muslims in Germany, ZMD). At least 80% are male, as per multiple references in the international press, probably based on head counts in refugee centers.
After weeks of deluge that necessitated the reintroduction of border controls, “only” 7,000 ‘migrants’ now arrive in Germany each weekend, compared with the previous 20,000. That’s according to one major source — but another reputable one cites, for the same mid-September period, a “sharply risen influx”, with 9,100 “irregular” entries on a single Wednesday, versus 6,000 the previous day.
Brigitte Meier, Commissioner for Social Affairs in Munich, stated that her city had reached the limit of what it could cope with and may be facing a humanitarian catastrophe. Markus Söder, Bavaria’s finance minister, expressed a similar opinion, from the fiscal side.
Deutsche Bahn (German Railroads) will keep its service to and from Austria and Hungary suspended until 4 October, apparently so that the government can deal with the multitude of future Germans already in the country. Train crossing controls of course cannot stem the flow of ‘migrants’, as their favorite sport is pulling the emergency brake on trains taking them out of Southern Europe — but not before roughing up the staff, sundry ransacking and mountains of rubbish, food, and feces left behind. They then jump out and walk on foot to Germany, into the arms of pathological altruism. Until words like “border” and “treason” resume the meaning they once had, all else is just the sound of one hand clapping.
One can only wish Godspeed and Good Luck to the good people of Germany, as the German government upped the ‘migrants’ ante from 800,000 to 1,000,000 in 2015 alone. Not happy enough with that, Mama Merkel said in a newspaper interview on 5 September that “the right to political asylum has no limits on the number of asylum seekers.”
Should compassion wear off and narrow down to “Syrian refugees” alone, 10,000 fake Syrian passports have already been seized in Bulgaria. Deals offered on Facebook (in Arabic) include £1,000 for a fake Syrian passport and £800 for smuggling from Turkey to Greece, per person. To spice things up a little, multiple fights have broken out between real Syrians and fake Syrians on the migration routes.
Some of the more noteworthy recent headlines from the Useful Idiot press include, “A global surge in refugees leaves Europe struggling to cope”; “As tragedies shock Europe, a bigger refugee crisis looms in the Middle East” and “The Arab world’s wealthiest nations are doing next to nothing for Syria’s refugees.” But nothing can disrupt the momentum of a German when he decides to eliminate a people, including himself.
“Dark Germany, Bright Germany: Which Side Will Prevail Under Strain of Refugees?” asked Der Spiegel on 31 August, inveighing as follows: “Germany is experiencing an unprecedented influx of immigrants who will fundamentally change the country. They represent a burden, but also a chance to create a New Germany [my emphasis], one that is more cosmopolitan and generous.”
On the same day, Der Spiegel published an interview with the president of the German Federal Office for Migration and Refugees, Manfred Schmidt, under the title “Countering the Hate.” Queried as to how many refugees Germany can still take in, Schmidt answered: “When it comes to the absorption of people who are fleeing persecution and require protection, there can be no upper ceiling.”
Again, on that same day, Deutsche Welle published “We are all Germany” with interviews of “German celebrities.” The five ‘celebrities’ featured four genuine products of the German soil named Gerald Asamoah, Enissa Amani, Abdelkarim, and Jaafar Abdul-Karim.
That part of the German people that doesn’t want to do away with itself has been called “Dark Germany” by Germany’s President Joachim Gauck, and a “disgrace” by Cardinal Reinhard Marx, chairman of the Conference of German Bishops. Angela Merkel’s relative epithets have been “vile,” “disgusting message of hatred,” “spreading hate,” “shameful,” “no place in Germany” and “not my country,” just as she has formerly said of the leaders of the anti-Islamization PEGIDA movement that they have “prejudice, coldness, even hatred in their hearts.”
23.09.2015, Einsiedel, Saxony: Anti-’migrant’ demonstration of 1,000 out of a total of 2,000 residents in that town on top of whom Merkel’s government wants to load 2000 refugees. The sign reads, “Merkel must go.” (From the Facebook page “Einsiedel Sagt NEIN zum Heim,” “Einsiedel says NO to home [for migrants].”)
Minister of Justice Heiko Maas, who is quite fond of hanging out in the mosques and Islamic centers of his government’s favored clients, is now pushing censorship measures applied to Germans who are not in favor of population replacement. Due to his pressure on Facebook relative to “racist abuse,” “illegal posts” and “misunderstood tolerance,” later augmented by Frau Merkel directly to Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, German media have reported (e.g. Bild on 14.09.2015) Facebook’s initiatives to start a propaganda campaign for “counter-argument to racism and xenophobia with the help of international experts,” a “task force to deal with hate messages on the Internet,” and a partnership with Voluntary Self-Monitoring of Multimedia Service Providers (FSM).
FSM is some kind of Orwellian creature that describes itself on its website as the “accredited self-regulatory body for the field of telemedia within the system of regulated self-regulation [sic] introduced under the Interstate Treaty on the Protection of Minors in the Media“ [text captured at www.fsm.de/about-us on 24.9.2015]. But the “Network Against Nazis” that Facebook is inviting, along with other NGOs and German political operatives, to its task force “to illuminate hate speech on the Internet” is a choice specimen in its own right. It describes itself on its website as the online portal of the Amadeu Antonio Foundation “encouraging action in conformity with the motto ‘words and deeds against far-right extremism’”. The Chairwoman of Amadeu Antonio Foundation is Anetta Kahane, an East German Jewish communist and Stasi agent (1974-82, code name “Victoria“, disclosure by Berliner Zeitung 2.4.2003).
All that is just the beginning. Where Facebook goes, Google cannot be far behind. Stern magazine reported (17.07.2015) that Google has deleted a map of refugee centers in Germany because it violated the “terms and conditions” by its caption, “No refugee center in my neighborhood.” And the iron fist of the German state is being primed too. Volker Beck, a militant homosexual and Germany’s media darling Green Party’s parliamentarian and spokesman said in support of the Minister of Justice that “sedition is no freedom of speech.” He recommended that the issue be discussed in a judicial conference, because “prosecution has to be optimized” (“Kein Ort für Rassismus,” Der Tagesspiegel, 27.8.2015).
But it’s not just some nefarious cabal of the ruling political establishment and their media megaphones. At train stations all over Germany the ‘migrants’ have been greeted with rounds of applause, songs, bags of food and sweets, toiletries and toys. “Refugees welcomed in Germany like war heroes,” The Telegraph called it. Not even a quarter of Germans think the country is accepting too many refugees, and about an equal percentage think it should take even more, per a recent poll for ZDF Television.
The German soccer league — as close to religious observance as remains in that country — is wearing “Refugees Welcome” patches on its jerseys. Saarland University has waived all entry requirements for refugees that still apply to Germans; only a test in one’s native language and one year of German study are required. And an “anti-fascist” popular song from the 1990s has now returned to the top of pop charts: Die Ärzte’s “Cry for Love” — much of it consisting of repeating the German word for as****e in reference to “far-right extremists.”
So many Germans are so addle-brained that in a recent privacy-activists’ rally in Berlin, next to the new, enlarged headquarters of Germany’s spy service, BND, the motto was “Refugees welcome, BND go away.” They don’t understand that’s just like in America and elsewhere in the West, immigration by millions of barbarians — of whom 10% are actual or “sleeper” terrorists and a majority are active sympathizers — is a ploy by which governments that import and welcome potential terrorists turn fascist tyrannies to their own peaceful serfs under the pretext of protecting them from “terror.” As if to confirm that, the main thing Germany’s “spy chief” Hans-Georg Maassen had to say in a 27.09.2015 radio interview was a warning that “the far-right” is becoming radicalized because of the influx of “refugees.”
These are deemed “fascists” in Germany: Demonstration by 400 anti-Islamization protesters in Leipzig, 26.09.2015 (Daily Mail/ AFP/Getty Images)
These are deemed “Anti-fascists” in Germany: ”Counter-protest” of more than 1,000 “left-wing activists” against the 400 ‘far-right extremists’ in Leipzig, 26.09.2015 (Daily Mail/ AFP/Getty Images)
“Germany in a state of SIEGE,” read the Daily Mail’s headline on 26 September. What a relief, therefore, to learn that a few months earlier, Munich-based Airbus Defense and Space completed the construction of a 900km (± 600m) state-of-the art border fence (Picture) to protect against Muslim invaders. In Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia, in turn, has pledged to help Germany with its own Muslim invaders by building 200 mosques in Germany.
Meanwhile, Jürgen Todenhöfer, a journalist who’s spent time embedded with ISIS, writes in a just-released book that ISIS is preparing “the largest religious cleansing in history” — a “nuclear tsunami” to wipe out “hundreds of millions” of, well, you, gentle reader. Being the good German that he is, and a former MP with Angela Merkel’s CDU party to boot, Todenhöfer believes that the West cannot defeat the ISIS Caliphate by military force. But I say, if not by force, than by a ruse — a brilliant stratagem of the West’s ruling elites that the German journalist fails to account for:
Grow ISIS by exporting “democracy” and destroying every despot who still holds his Muslim people in some kind of order. Before ISIS comes to you, bring it in, as “immigrants” and “refugees.” Recruit ISIS into your nuke universities, industries and military, leaven with subsidized mosques and imams, and push it up the ladder for the sake of “racial justice” and “religious tolerance.” In charge of your nation and your armed forces put women, as Europe has done, or hermaphroditic African crypto-Muslim Marxists, as the United States has. Anoint George Soros as The Great Sage and Benefactor of the Western World. Persecute relentlessly the critical voices within. Voila! No more ISIS problem.
Galina Ivanova’s diary, concurrent with her effort to emigrate from Germany, ends with a 26 August post:
“We understood the words about the end of the world improperly. We were expecting something like a worldwide flood. But the flood was of a different kind. These people, they are the locust.”
I beg to change the focus of that observation. It’s the flooders, the bringers of the locust, who have to be understood, and not the flooding locust. I propose as a working hypothesis that the first Holocaust by German hands was of the Jews, and the second, much larger, was of the Slavs. And now the third one is aborning: an unwitting Holocaust of the stupefied Germans themselves and, spilling from Germany into the future, of what used to be called “the white race.”
We all know about the first one. But as terrible as it was — probably the most evil barbarity that ever has one people inflicted on another — its “limited” scope: six million dead compared to such figures as Muhammad’s (and successors’) inestimable hundreds of millions, Mao’s 60+ million and Stalin’s 40+ million — cannot, by itself, explain the great counterpolar madness consuming the descendants of the perpetrators three generations later.
In order to understand the third Holocaust, at present just filling the critical mass reservoir, we need to know something about the second, for it alone brings Hitler into the Mao-Stalin League. More importantly, the Germans need to be reminded too, as, in contrast with their exemplary penitence for the first Holocaust, they have largely buried and covered up the second, to the point of repeating some of it now. Repressed cognition of unspeakable horrors does have a way of coming back in unexpected ways…
|1.||Ivanova’s diary was published by Komsomolskaya Pravda in the original Russian on 2 September 2015, under the title (trans.): “Chronicle of the destruction of Germany: In order to appease the refugees, the Catholic Church refused to baptize infants.” Komsomolskaya Pravda, once a mainstay of the Soviet press, is now Russia’s highest circulation tabloid. It’s co-owned by Russia’s biggest business, Gazprom, and Norwegian investors.|
|3.||In “Turks in Germany are a Time Bomb” at the Family Security Matters web page, 22.03.2013, Dr. Sami Alrabaa states that 80% of Germany’s Turks are on welfare. However, no sources credible enough are cited in support of this figure.|
|4.||This situation is not unique to Germany and does not relate to “refugees” alone. In every Western country, stories about major crimes committed by racial minorities are blocked, censored, manipulated or softened in order not to lead the audience to “racist” conclusions.|
|5.||Quote reported by Dustin Volz at the nextgov.com federal government technology website, 8 Sept 2015.
Max Denken was well on his way to PhDs in Economics and Political Science until he discovered that the former was based on quantifying wildly fanciful assumptions and the latter was much closer to Scientology than to Science. Born Central European, he has become Marginal American: wrong race, wrong gender, wrong sexual orientation, wrong religion, wrong thoughts.
|2015||Aug||8||Totentanz: Austria’s New-Old Waltz|
|Sep||15||A Nightmare, Reborn