After 26 Years, East Defeats West

The following article from lays out the case for what Angela Merkel has actually managed to achieve: the victory of East Germany over West Germany.

Many thanks to H. Numan for the translation:

Merkel against her fraction: ‘I don’t care whether I’m guilty of the refugee flood’

Thanks to Merkel, East Germany defeated West Germany from the grave: ‘Merkel commits ethnocide on the German people by allowing 15 million Muslims in five years’. In September Bavaria welcomes 135,000 migrants — Nieheim: Germans are evicted because they have to make way for “refugees”.

It’s totally different this time, but apart from Brussels, the biggest threat to the continent comes again from Germany.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel revealed herself in very short time to be the most dangerous European leader since Adolf Hitler. Exaggerated, you say? Read what well-informed sources during a recent CDU/CSU meeting have to say about it: “I don’t care whether or not I’m guilty of the refugee flood. They are here now.”

Eventually, East defeated the West

Some analysts say that Merkel’s DDR past — as a convinced Soviet Socialist and cultural nihilist — caught up with her. However, it is more likely she never gave up that past. Therewith she achieved with shrewd politics what no one thought possible after the fall of the Wall in 1989: From its 26-year-old grave East Germany defeated West Germany.

Merkel commits ethnocide on her own people

The German columnist C. Jahn accuses the chancellor therefore of a real crime against humanity: ethnocide, or a ‘politically controlled destruction of a population by dissolution, assimilation, and loss of culture and language’. The 10 to 15 million Muslims Merkel wants to let loose on Germany during the coming five years will ensure that one out of every four Germans will be Muslim.

Experiences with second and third generation Muslim migrants teach us that most of them not only refuse to integrate, but become much more radical. That means, according to Cahn, “Germans will have no other choices” and “must assimilate. They will culturally and ethnically be merged, as it appears now, into the much more violent and aggressive Muslim colonists. Only their language will remain for a while, and that will eventually disappear as well.’

‘For her and her political henchmen a monument will be erected. As one can observe already in the streets of Baghdad, Kabul and Mogadishu, where millions carrying pictures of Merkel travel towards Heidelberg, Weimar and Würzburg [3].

Germans are evicted for “refugees”

On the independent financial site DWN it is observed that Angela Merkel works on an ‘unprecedented experiment’ with an ‘unlimited agenda’ by importing millions of Muslims. ‘She is eerily capable of destroying the German economy and justice system permanently.’ That happens for example in Hamburg, where commercial real estate is confiscated to turn into refugee shelters. In Nieheim, Germans were evicted from their own houses to make room for migrants [7]

135,000 migrants to Bavaria — just in September

And come the migrants do. Even despite the temporarily erected border controls. Just in September Bavaria alone opened its gates for 135,000 migrants. That is as much as in the previous eight months put together.[4]

The government in Berlin promised the federal states €670 per refugee per month, which amounts to 4 billion next year. Most commentators expect this amount will have to be multiplied, as the rampant flood of refugees will grow to at least a full million.[6]

Germany or nothing!

‘Germany or nothing’ was what a so called ‘refugee’ family literally demanded in front of Sky News cameras. Indeed, they threatened that ‘otherwise they would go back to their native country’. Would real refugees say something like that? And wouldn’t it be wiser to send those obvious fortune seekers back to where they came from?

The British liberals — how naive can one get?

The leader of the British Liberal-Democrat party gave the astounding commentary that ‘the migrants do not know at all we have such good welfare system, and are only looking for a “liberal” place to live’. With that commentary the left wing liberals showed they are as clueless as their Dutch counterparts D66, who have been proponents of mass migration for years. [5]

— Xander

1.   Twitter — (Dr. Hugo Müller-Vogg)
3.   P.i.-News (via en vertaald door E.J. Bron)
4.   Frankfurter Allgemeine
5.   Breitbart (/ YouTube)
6.   Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten
7.   Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten

39 thoughts on “After 26 Years, East Defeats West

  1. Discussions of immigration typically also speak of assimilation. But here, assimilation takes on a new, reverse (perverse?) nuance: the autochthons must assimilate to the replacement population.
    “Germans will have no other choices” and “must assimilate. They will culturally and ethnically be merged, as it appears now, into the much more violent and aggressive Muslim colonists. Only their language will remain for a while, and that will eventually disappear as well.”
    == UNQUOTE==
    I wonder what language the German language will be replaced by. Perhaps by the .

    By the way, fractie [Dutch] = Fraktion [German] = faction [English] (not “fraction”).

    • Au contraire, Mr. Spahn — both “faction” and “fraction” are used as the English translation of “fractie”. I’ve been editing these translations for ten years, and both are used. It’s one of those words that doesn’t have a good English equivalent. It’s not really the same as “faction”, which has the connotation of “an antagonistic subset of a group that is experiencing some sort of political conflict”. On the other hand, we don’t normally use “fraction” in this context at all. So there’s no ideal translation for it.

      • Thanks for the correction. “Merkel against her fraction” in the headline might lead the reader to think of mathematics (or maybe chemistry). In checking a dictionary, I cannot find a meaning of “fraction” that means a group of like-minded people.

        George Washington, in his farewell address, seems to identify factions with political parties:
        I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

        This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

        The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.

        • As you are no doubt aware, the words fraktie en faktie are both correct Dutch words, with slighty different meanings. So close, in fact, that they are often used for the same purpose.

  2. This is an article I can certainly take into consideration. Nevertheless, now it’s time for consequence management.

  3. Many of the Germans say our country is “DDR mit Reisefreiheit” – GDR (former communist East Germany) with the freedom to travel abroad.

  4. i hope the German people rise up and take BACK what’s theirs, they must or all of Europe is doomed, a good start would be rounding up Merkel et al and [intemperate suggestion redacted].

  5. What truly fascinating times we live in.

    Interesting too.

    It will not end well and in such a completely predictable way that one is forced to assume it’s intentional and not just borne of magical thinking.

    Ah well……..

  6. “In Nieheim, Germans were evicted from their own houses to make room for migrants [7]”

    For the sake of accuracy it must be added, that the evicted were not exactly living in their own house, but were tenants in public housing projects. The local government as owner simply made use of a law allowing the owner of rented-out property to terminate the contract for the reason of “own need”. Subject of debate is that this law actually was intended for individuals, who e.g. have grown children to whom they wish to give the living space. In the case of public housing these are often retirees who lived there for a long time already, or low-income people who haven’t a good chance to find another place on the free market. And they weren’t reasonably expecting to be forced to.

    However, some are suspecting that the taboo of the government actually disowning private property is going to fall eventually. The German “Basic Law” (our surrogate for a constitution) contains a point which could be used for leverage here in its article 14 (English translation here:

    • What is the difference? It is still their home! Semantics. One does not evict one’s own for aliens…..

      The German State just passed legislation to seize private property too….family homes bought and paid for. I am a Von Lewinksi by descent and my family lost all of its property in Prussia.

      Effing Communists….

      • “… that the evicted were not exactly living in their own house, but were tenants in public housing projects.”

        That is such a [deprecated] comment.

        Doubt that being a private property owner is going to protect you from the crazy heads, hope you have deep pockets to pay the jizya tax.

      • The difference is, yes, it is their home, but not their house. Not semantics, legalities and moral depravity when law is abused to serve a political purpose. We’ve had all this before in history and you’re right about the commies. They are back in full force, and not just here but all the way to Brussels. And Islam is the ultimate form of communism, maybe this is why they’re so fascinated about it.

        • Are you then saying that the renter or leaseholder has no business or interest in this fight, why then should he risk his life to defend another man’s property? Ultra ludicrous for him to risk his life in this case where the negligent property owners desire is to surrender the property to the usurper.

    • Of avoiding being despised and hated [De contemptu et odio fugiendo]

      “BUT since I have spoken about the most important of the qualities mentioned above, I should like to discuss the others briefly under this general rule: that the prince, as was noted above, should concentrate upon avoiding those things that make him hated and contemptible. When he has avoided this, he will have carried out his duties, and none of his other infamous deeds will cause him any danger at all. As I have said, what makes him hated above all else is being rapacious and a usurper of the property and the women of his subjects. He must refrain from this.”

      (Machiavelli, The Prince, Chapter 19)

    • Even if they were renting the property – does that make it right to kick them out, after many years (or decades) of tenancy, in favour of newcomers who made a conscious decision to leave their own homes (or refugee camps), and illegally cross the borders and head to Germany?

  7. The people of Europe have become so imbecilic that the likes of Merkel and Sturgeon do not even have to deploy an ideological argument in commissioning the Rape of Europe. Counterfeit compassion and synthetic sentimentality have been enough to the fill the moral void and exhort the peoples of Europe to indulge in their own destruction.


    So, the argument for multiculturalism goes, no culture is superior to another, and no culture should compete with any other. And if we understand that, we can all get along just fine.

    German Chancellor Angela Merkel went along with that idea for years but has recently changed her mind. Earlier this month she dared to tell a meeting of younger members of her conservative Christian Democratic Union party that multiculturalism is a failed experiment that needs to be rejected.

    “Starting in the 60s,” she said, “we invited guest-workers to Germany. We kidded ourselves for a while that . . . one day they’d go home. That isn’t what happened. And of course the tendency was to say: let’s be ‘multikulti’ and live next to each other and enjoy being together. [But] this concept has failed, failed utterly.”

    By 2002, reported Canada’s Globe and Mail, there were 2.5 million Turks living in Germany, of which fewer than half a million had become German citizens. One study indicates that 80 percent of Turkish parents cannot participate in parent-teacher conferences at their children’s schools because they don’t speak enough German.


    • She is a product of “Collapsible Communism”….
      I reckon Hollande and Merkel are closet Commies and will team up with Putin…..

    • Merkel, Sarkozy and Cameron all prominently and pointedly declared multiculturalism a failure when it suited them. They all did it to appease tabloid news editors. All three are spivs and they were playing the gallery.
      No contemporary west European leader gives a [hoot] about the native peoples of Europe–they would be just as happy governing Eskimos. The incredible thing is the bottomless stupidity and cowardice of west European electorates, who go on voting for these wretches. They deserve what they are getting in my opinion.

  9. I would like to point out that the majority of Americans do NOT read German. Therefore, all these comments become meaningless. However, I have read that many Germans do read/write English. . . if they want to be understood, perhaps they could take up their English writing instruments.

    In addition, something I saw earlier makes me realize that Ms. Merkel is no Friend of her German citizens since she keeps importing Muslims by the thousands and has threatened (or promised) to bring in another million. That will surely enrich Germany, at least in rape. And people (German) being evicted from their homes to make way for the migrants — this is so backward that Germany deserves whatever happens to her when the full cohort is in place. Very sad, though.

    • Towards the end of the war, Berliners joked that it was better to have a Russian on your belly than a bomb – now they can have both – rapes and bombs!

      Isn’t multiculturalism great?

      “It was in East Prussia that the Red Army began to rape women on a scale which surpassed casual sexual desire and reflected atavistic commitment to the violation of an entire society.” (Max Hastings, Armageddon, Kindle location 5987)

      • Except, as reported by many eyewitnesses from the eraa, it was (mostly) NOT Russians doing the raping – but the Red Army’s “Mongol” soldiers, and those from the various “stans”. One can safely assume that their religion affiliation is, for the most part, the same as most of the current “migrants”.

  10. There is still time. the political right needs to seize power and close the borders. muslims already in Germany should be rounded up and deported back to middle east.

    • The big question mark in all Western lands is what will the military do? In normal times, I presume there is in all of them a commitment to a non-political military.

      But what is their thinking now in these abnormal times? Surely it must strike the members of the Black Watch and members of the U.S. military as very strange indeed to be sent to defend countries and borders far from their own. We have already seen how the Secret Army appeared when a good portion of the French army was unhappy over certain national developments.

      In the remaining hours of the deceptive stability that precedes our great economic upheaval, the military will be content to wait in their barracks but, as central control wanes and legitimacy of centuries-old governments fades, a different mindset might develop.

      As Herb Stein said, “If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.” It’s perfectly clear now that the center is collapsing. It took 125 years for the national debt of the U.S. to reach $1B. Now it’s $18T. What names, forces, or coalitions are at work at this very moment to reverse this mad use of debt?

      All the movers and shakers are doing now is moving money around from one bank account to the other and pretending that their clever public relations and media evasions and distortions are still keeping the good-natured yeomanry under control.

    • Pro active and far less costly in lives and treasure than allowing great herds of crippled senseless Muslim savages and their offspring to run wild – self injecting in their own inimitable lowlife ways.

  11. Merkel is importing rape on a massive scale not seen since 1945. At least the Soviets were strapping blond hunks with high cheekbones…

    • Not quite. Many were foul-smelling, sheepskin-wearing (over their commie uniform blouse) Kalmuks, Kazakhs, Tajiks, Mongols etc. — i.e. from a Middle-Asian Muslim culture subsumed into the Soviet Union.

    • Where are you getting your info on Rusky Berlin rapist so. Old Soviet era fantasy magazines in cheap color. Stay away from planning.

  12. Totally disagree with the article: there was a victory of the Eastern part of the western part. First: in all countries of Eastern Communists only abandoned the regime, they did not come out of public life. The same goes for the United States, which for years made by the FBI monitoring of anti-American activities, but did nothing to undermine them, and allowed later notorious communist ingressassem that in public life. Just the fact that today we have communist or progressive groups vying elections, already shows us that the whole political scene is polarized. Nazism was defeated, but communism won because he was regarded as an ally of the western axis. In Germany there are a lot of politicians who were active as communist agents, or as agitators. Some of them entered politics, and others just formed organs of activism and NGOs. For me the author is completely wrong. The fact that West Germany have joined with East Germany without bothering to undermine the Marxist ideology proves that West Germany had an interest in keeping this alive bias within the new unified Germany. Ideological currents as libertarianism and liberalism are welcoming for progressives, because these two currents propagate what we call the Cultural Marxism. Anyone who wants to know what it’s about is just search, and who knows understand what I meant.

    So there was a victory of the Eastern part of the western side, there was rather an assimilation between the two, and both had the notion that socialism and its variants (liberalism and libertarianism) would continue in public life, giving a chance to the future arise in the form of policies, as in the case of Multiculturalismo etc. When Germany was unified the two ideological currents were unified: a market economy, but with progressive policies of a welfare state.

    • Few dare to acknowledge or recognise that political synergism in fear of it collapsing the faux ivory towers built on their political estates.

  13. No European vacation for me, folks. I don’t want to be assaulted by a Muslim gang because I don’t look Muslim, or because perhaps I look Jewish (which I’m not). I don’t want to be arrested by the local police for going to the rescue of a European woman or girl being raped by a Muslim gang and kicking their Meccan buts or gouging their eyes out. I don’t want to be arrested for publicly or privately calling Islam evil and Muslim men psychotic pigs. I don’t want to be “ostracized” for making faces of disgust at the sight of Muslim women in their headbags, or calling them mindless brood mares to their faces (provided I can see their faces). No, thanks. I’ve always wanted to visit Europe and experience its charms. But the charm is gone. Europe is donning an Islamic hairs shirt.

    • Oh go on! It’s not like it’s another Morroco or northwest UK frontier? With all that cleverness one would have thought that the brighter sparks in the Eyou would have given that a “….wait a minute……” In 1964.

  14. Multi-cultural? Don’t human societies carrying the spores of Islam turn out to be mono-cultural with the uniformity of an ossified rodent [piece of excrement]?

  15. The latest piece of communistic chutzpah from this atrocious woman is this:

    “It will change our politics radically and shift the emphasis once more”

    referring to the mass-immigration-invasion she has unleashed on Germany. A clearer confession of destructive intent could not be asked for, she is deliberately trying to destroy the German right and nation forever, from the position of Chancellor and leader of the CDU, which she clearly holds falsely and deceptively, with an actual far-left agenda (something I myself made the error of disbelieving when I first heard it years ago).

Comments are closed.