The Mark of Evil

The following essay by Nick McAvelly was originally published at Patriot’s Corner in a slightly different form.

The Mark of Evil
by Nick McAvelly

“One belief, more than any other, is responsible for the slaughter of individuals on the altars of the great historical ideals — justice or progress or the happiness of future generations, or the sacred mission or emancipation of a nation or race or class, or even liberty itself, which demands the sacrifice of individuals for the freedom of society. This is the belief that somewhere, in the past or in the future, in divine revelation or in the mind of an individual thinker, in the pronouncements of history or science, or in the simple heart of an uncorrupted good man, there is a final solution.”

Berlin, Isaiah (2012-12-31). The Proper Study Of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays (p. 237). Random House. Kindle Edition.

Politicians have spent years telling us that multiculturalism is the final solution to the question of how human beings ought to live. Not one of them has the decency to acknowledge the murders that have been committed in its name. History teaches us that when an elite group believe they have discovered a final solution, they will sacrifice anyone in an attempt to make their final solution a reality. The social engineers who have inflicted the poison of multiculturalism upon us are no different in this regard. The French Jews and cartoonists who died at the hands of the Kouachi brothers in Paris on 7th January 2015 are the latest people to die in the name of that evil doctrine.

One of the foundational premises of multiculturalism is the claim that all cultures and values are compatible. Obviously, this is false. As the political philosopher Isaiah Berlin once said:

“… it seems to me that the belief that some single formula can in principle be found whereby all the diverse ends of men can be harmoniously realised is demonstrably false. If, as I believe, the ends of men are many, and not all of them are in principle compatible with each other, then the possibility of conflict — and of tragedy — can never wholly be eliminated from human life, either personal or social. The necessity of choosing between absolute claims is then an inescapable characteristic of the human condition.”

Berlin, Isaiah (2012-12-31). The Proper Study Of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays (p. 239). Random House. Kindle Edition.

The traitor class have decided that Britain must be culturally enriched and turned into a multicultural paradise. So all criticism of Islamic doctrines and practices has been declared verboten. This has allowed the traitor class to use the religion of Islam as a targeting system so they can identify individuals with the moral backbone and intellectual integrity to defend Britain’s traditional Judeo-Christian values. In Great Britain today, if you speak up and state the most obvious and inescapable facts: Britain is a Christian country, our traditional values are based not on Islam but on Judeo-Christianity, Britain is not and has never been an Islamic country, and Islamic doctrines and practices are incompatible with British values and with human rights legislation (just read the USCIRF reports on the human rights abuses that happen year in and year out in the Islamic world), then you have the potential to threaten the legitimacy of the traitor class. And once you have spoken up, they know who you are.

Woe betide anyone who questions ‘politically correct’ dogma. The traitor class see anyone who speaks the truth as their enemies, and they will go to any lengths to destroy them. We need to realise that we are not dealing with rational, morally sane people here. The traitor class are capable of absolutely anything.

Isaiah Berlin understood that not all human values are compatible with one another and different values will inevitably clash at the level of civilisations, cultures, groups and individuals. The very notion that there is a final solution to the question of how people ought to live together is incoherent, since values and doctrines conflict in this way. Nowhere is this conflict felt more keenly than in the area of religion.

The doctrines of Islam, for instance, are incompatible with the doctrines of Mormonism because they claim that Mohammed was the last prophet and if that is true, then Joseph Smith and every Mormon prophet who came after him were not prophets at all, and every word they wrote was a lie. The doctrines of Islam are also incompatible with those of mainstream Christianity because Islam denies the crucifixion, denies the resurrection and denies the divinity of Jesus. The idea that all religions are the same is an intellectual error of the first magnitude. You cannot possibly believe in different religions, you can only believe in one.

This is heresy to the traitor class, but it is the truth. Having the freedom to make informed choices about religious matters is one of the necessary conditions of living an authentic life.

“He who lets the world, or his own portion of it, choose his plan of life for him, has no need of any other faculty than the ape-like one of imitation. He who chooses his plan for himself, employs all his faculties. He must use observation to see, reasoning and judgment to foresee, activity to gather materials for decision, discrimination to decide, and when he has decided, firmness and self-control to hold to his deliberate decision.”

Mill, John Stuart (2006-08-31). On Liberty and the Subjection of Women (Penguin Classics) (p. 67). Penguin UK. Kindle Edition.

The traditional conservative understanding of the world was built on the realisation that only by establishing a political system which recognises and honours the God-given liberties of each individual human being can we all live a normal, authentic life. The traitor class are doing everything in their power to destroy these ideas, and to bring us all into a condition of spiritual slavery, where we accept incoherent lies as truth and bend the knee to an all-powerful state.

The traitor class have already created a system that allows them to target potential dissenters, restrict free speech and increase the reach and power of the state, and we all know they will never give back what they have taken. In the future, not only will they try to stop individuals from discovering the truth about different religions, thereby preventing them from making informed choices about their own religious beliefs, they will actively persecute individuals who choose to become Christians.

Here’s why: The prince of the power of the air, as Satan is referred to in the Bible, may have thought that by corrupting the world he would be setting an insoluble problem before his Creator. If God did not punish men and women who gave themselves over to evil, then the universe would not be just. And if the universe was not just, then God would have no grounds for punishing Satan for what he has done. That’s the name of the game here, in case anyone was wondering. But God manoeuvred the scales of justice into eternal alignment when He allowed the Roman Empire to crucify his Son. Punishment had to be meted out for all the evil acts committed in this world, and it was. If you accept that sacrifice then you can wake up, acknowledge that you are a free, rational being, and become a true spiritual warrior. No other religion gives you the power or the freedom to do this. Islamic doctrines, for example, teach that Christ was not the Son of God, that He was not crucified, and that He was not resurrected. That leaves you adrift on the Satanic swells that roll over this earth, with no means whatsoever of setting your feet upon sure ground.

That is precisely where the traitor class want you to be. It doesn’t matter if they call their final solution communism, national socialism or multiculturalism. By using the power of the state to prevent you from finding out the truth about Islam, they are denying you the right to make an informed decision about which set of religious beliefs, if any, you believe to be true. The traitor class want to make sure you cannot live in accordance with your own lights and cannot assign meaning to your own life. They want to take everything from you, right up to and including your innermost thoughts. They want to leave you naked, sliced open and dead inside, with no other option but to worship… them.

That, my friends, is the mark of evil.

25 thoughts on “The Mark of Evil

  1. So! is planet-X actually Satan, as a roaring lion, seeking to devour those whom he may?

    Is this why the current system of control is so complete and comprehensive, and worldwide in its nature?

    Is Satan the all seeing eye at the top of the NWO pyramid?

    • For many years, I held the Nietzschean view that nothing existed outside the whole, the universe, the cosmos, that could judge anything I did – all this nonsense about religion made no sense to me. Then I visited the Imperial War Museum in London and went upstairs to the Holocaust Exhibition. And understood that evil is a real and active force in this world.

      If you accept that, then the Nietzschean, closed-system worldview is refuted. And where do you go from there?

      I looked at it from a software engineering persepective – it’s easy enough to code a 2d array, a 3d array … and you can visualise that ‘reality’ which you are creating as you do that. Our human understanding can handle a 3d world. But it’s easy enough to code a 4d data structure, a 5 d data structure … that ‘exists’ in the ‘reality’ of the software you are writing – although you can’t visualise it & really have no idea what it actually ‘looks like’. It exists – you’ve just created it – but your mind isn’t designed to understand what it ‘looks like’. It seems possible for further aspects, or dimensions, of reality to exist – to have been created, if you like – which our limited 3d minds can’t access or even imagine.

      So evil exists then? Well ok – I can’t get beyond this 3d world my mind is designed to work with, but I can accept that there is a further ‘dimension’ where evil comes from, because I can see the evidence of its existence not only at the IWM in London … but nowadays, everywhere I look.

      And once you start thinking along those lines, you end up in some unexpected places.

      Know what I mean?

      • Apologies if that was a bit of a ramble, it’s six in the morning & I’m a bit wooly-headed. Time to head on up the wooden hill, I do believe …

        “One is necessary, one is a piece of fate, one belongs to the whole, one is the whole – there exists nothing which could judge, measure, compare, condemn our being, for that would be to judge, measure, compare, condemn the whole…But nothing exists apart from the whole!” – Nietzsche.

        And yet … evil exists.

        • Evil does not exist if one cannot define ‘good’ hence the need of Cultural Marxism to confuse the idea of ‘Good’.

          So we get moral relativity, and in a culture where moral relativity is practised, so evil can abound because society is no longer able to make the comparisons upon which ‘judgement’ can be based.

          Thus can TR be persecuted and hounded by Flintlock’s yellow/greenish things; and we see now exactly the same happening to the PEGIDA leadership.

          What we are seeing is the disestablishment of the rule of law, to be replaced by the ‘rule of opinion’, an opinion that can be manipulated oh so easily by those who control the media.

      • “The traitor class want to make sure you cannot live in accordance with your own lights and cannot assign meaning to your own life. They want to take everything from you, right up to and including your innermost thoughts. They want to leave you naked, sliced open and dead inside, with no other option but to worship… them.”

        You disagree?

    • “Is Satan the all seeing eye at the top of the NWO pyramid?”

      I don’t know you tell me. I’m not really interested in all that NWO palaver. What I’m saying is it is now becoming quite obvious that, in Britain, the traitor class are determined to attack our traditional Judeo-Christian heritage at every opportunity. They want to prevent us from living an authentic life – they want to construct a political system where agents of the state are the only ones authorised to assign meaning to our lives. They want to take the place of God, in our society and in our personal lives. They want to be worshipped … And we all know who wants to be like God …

      • The NWO is a convenient way to express the aims of satanism without having to broach the idea of the supernatural, if one says ‘Satan’ then the sniggers start and people envision the horns, tail and trident.

        The Book of Enoch paints a picture of the ‘fallen Angels’ being very scared of Enoch the mighty man of Yahweh. Enoch’s faith had undone the work of the ‘fall’ (the poisoning of man’s opinions such that he judged ‘good’ and ‘bad’ for himself).

        So Enoch was as Adam before the fall, powerful, dominating the demons. This is exactly what Satan does NOT want! so he, Satan, sows confusion, he divides and he rules, because he must obey a man made in the image of Yah, so his prime aim is to not let mankind gain that knowledge – and hence the religions that steer men away from knowledge; from the bible in its original language (the translations are somewhat dubious) and substitute for Yah the doctrines of men.

          • Nick, the Eye in the Pyramid has been associated with Freemasons, Rosicrucians (I think) and the Illuminati; its presence on the US dollar bill tends to encourage conspiracy theorists (not that they need much).

            Hence my, entirely friendly, dig at MC, above.

  2. Multiculturalism can only exist in one part of the world if monoculturalism exists elsewhere. A monoculture must have been allowed to develop in order to become a recognisable culture. Therefore a belief in multiculturalism is a logical paradox because, without identifiable source monocultures comprising a multicultural society, that multicultural society could not exist. Any attempt to create a global multicultural society would fail because, sooner or later, that society would become a monoculture.

    So, what we have is a belief that multiculturalism is right for some parts of the world but not for others. Yet, if we’re all the same under the skin, then surely what is right for one part of the world must be right for other parts.

    So we really have two paradoxes.

  3. It’s too bad–but they ask for it (IN SPADES!)
    Tommy (in photo) is not a target–rather it must be those yellow/greenish things that surround and oppress him.
    When our ‘officer friendly’s’ morph into JACKBOOTED THUGS it will just be too bad for them. THEY have the decision to make–namely whose side are they on?

    Once the thugs are taken care of–we can go after the muzzies.

  4. Multiculturalism is simply a Trojan Horse aimed at undermining and destroying the Western Civilization produced by Christianity and the Enlightenment. Its purpose is to prepare the West for a return to Despotism and Tyranny.

  5. “The doctrines of Islam are also incompatible with those of mainstream Christianity because Islam denies the crucifixion, denies the resurrection and denies the divinity of Jesus. The idea that all religions are the same is an intellectual error of the first magnitude. You cannot possibly believe in different religions, you can only believe in one.” —

    Or you can believe in none; or accept some doctrines but not all; or accept the moral code but have doubts about the soteriology. There are many non-Muslim Americans who do not believe that the Christian theology of redemption is strictly true; some of them are devout Jews, who I daresay are probably not “adrift on the Satanic swells” as a consequence. Many of those “unbelievers” do not behave much differently from Christian believers except for how they spend Sunday mornings.

    The crux of the issue is not what theology one “believes,” but what kind of behavior is cultivated in the society. There is no necessary, inseparable connection between Christian ethics — which are rooted in Judaism — and the Christian doctrine that one’s soul is condemned for eternity without faith in the vicarious sacrifice of Jesus. (There’s a big shift in emphasis when you go from the Gospel narratives, with their ethical lessons, to the Pauline epistles, with their doctrine of “justification by faith.” And the doctrine that faith washes away all sin has the potential to undermine the ethical code.)

    Insisting that the ethical code is absolutely dependent on subscribing to the whole salvific theology can make the ethical code unpalatable to people who view that theology as unconvincing. When we are confronting the brutal rigidity of the Islamic “believe this or else!” ethos, it isn’t helpful to insist that the solution requires believing a different doctrine that must be accepted on faith.

    • One of the best responses to Calvin, et al, that I’ve seen in a long time.

      Paul was a fiery polemicist – being knocked off his donkey on the Damascus Road didn’t help – but he had enough grounding in Hellenic philosophy to make a case for his own ethical lessons based on Christ’s teachings. Thus, as he says, without love virtue doesn’t matter. In that sense his Christology is close to the original. The “faith washes away all sin” was simply a way of saying that one can always begin again. It was his antidote to the despair that accumulates when “perfection” becomes the enemy of “good enough”. That was his struggle – the desire for perfection.

  6. ….so WHY are they doing this? What is their end game? Or rather, after they’ve silenced all anti-Islam dissent, they (the traitor class) is left with an ascendant and emboldened Islam within their own borders. Certainly they are aware of this. After using Muslims as their shock troops in order to silence opposition and seize power, is there going to be some global equivalent ‘Night of the Long Knives’ when the ‘Brown Shirts’ are eliminated? If not, it (NWO) is then left with an Islamic problem of their own that would seem a lot harder to handle than dissenting natives. Just askin’.

    • You are right, it is not rational unless there is an ultimate objective, hence, as @Nick points out above, the need for a ‘Satanic’ style supernatural character, and that perhaps it is his subtlety at play, and of which we are seeing only the symptoms and consequences……

      “We are seeing through a glass darkly”, as Paul would say.

      • Sadly, humans can be quite nasty enough without invoking supernatural evil.

        More fortunately, the opposite is also true!

        • I’ve seen people w/o a “supernatural view” experience either extreme evil or goodness beyond what they could grasp that they turned to a supernatural explanation because, for them, that was the only thing that seemed to fit their understanding.

          We all search for meaning in one fashion or another.

    • Such is a fundamental miscalculation of which every leftist is guilty of: all leftists think they will be in the secretariat/politburo/inner party/secret party/whatever they call their upper echelon. Never mind that the entire history of socialism is rife with internecine warfare amongst and upon its own ranks. And never mind that all these street revolutionaries are always the first to be dragged up to the wall or edge of the pit and shot. If they are lucky.

Comments are closed.