Imagine There’s No Islam — It’s Easy If You Try!

The following excerpts are from a speech given on the floor of parliament by Machiel de Graaf, a member of parliament for Geert Wilders’ Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV) in the Netherlands.

What an exhilarating, energizing, astounding speech this is! Geert Wilders was prosecuted twice, and is about to be prosecuted again, for saying things that were far more circumspect and far less inflammatory to Muslim sensibilities than these frank statements of fact and opinion by Mr. de Graaf. Presumably the speaker is enjoying the protection of his parliamentary immunity while speaking.

I hope this one goes viral on the Internet. Many thanks to SimonXML for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Transcript (the times shown are from the original full-length video):

00:30   Without Islam, the Netherlands would be a wonderful country.
00:34   I have heard very few speakers yet on this subject, although everyone is of course
00:37   concerned with their own issues during the budget.
00:40   Without Islam, the Netherlands would not lose something like 7.2 billion a year
00:44   on mass immigration.
00:46   Without Islam there would not be any mosques in the Netherlands
00:50   and people would not be confronted every day
00:53   by Islamic headscarves and djellabas,
00:56   “hate beards” and minarets,
00:58   a country without all the symbols of Islamic domination, wonderful.
01:02   What a country The Netherlands would be
01:05   without Islam. We wouldn’t have to deal with the policy of
01:10   population replacement, nor with the policy of Islamic colonization,
01:14   nor with the settlement policy in more and more districts in large and small cities.
01:19   Without Islam, the Netherlands would be protected,
01:22   protected from the social disruption that
01:26   is taking place as a result of mass immigration,
01:29   that of hate preachers who come here through
01:31   family reunification, victim behaviour,
01:34   Moroccan crime, Turkish interference,
01:37   and which take place by making Islamic demands
01:41   for adjustment by the Netherlands and by the Dutch.
01:44   All those barbaric, backward totalitarian ideas
01:47   from a 7th century leader of a band of robbers, a mass murderer and paedophile,
01:52   Madam President, without Islam,
01:54   Pim Fortuyn would not have been murdered by Volkert van de Graaf, who claimed
01:58   that he acted out of piety with Muslims.
02:02   Without Islam, Theo van Gogh would not have been slaughtered by Mohammed Bouyeri,
02:06   and my own party leader, Geert Wilders, would not need bodyguards.
02:10   Without Islam, politics would not be full of Islam-huggers,
02:14   each one of them with their own cynical interest or naive outlook.
02:18   ——–
02:32   Without Islam, Madam President, in the
02:35   Netherlands we wouldn’t have honour killings,
02:37   and the phenomenon of nephew-niece marriages would virtually no longer exist.
02:41   Jewish children would simply be able to go to school without protection,
02:44   and gays and lesbians would be safe on our streets.
02:47   Without Islam we would have to spend something like half as much on welfare,
02:52   we would need fewer prisons and police
02:54   and much less money would go to deprived areas.
02:57   Integration subsidies would be unnecessary.
03:00   We would have less animal mistreatment, and apartheid would be a word in the history books.
03:05   Without Islam, highly qualified Dutch people would feel less inclined to emigrate.
03:10   Without Islam, Sharia would not be insidiously introduced in more and more districts
03:14   but in their judgements, judges would not
03:17   not again, …. make allowance for it.
03:20   Without Islam, Minister Asscher would not have had his election poster translated
03:24   into Turkish in 2010. And in the Dutch parliament no-one would ever have
03:28   shouted “May Allah punish you severely”,
03:31   and no washroom or prayer room would have been demanded
03:34   by Islamic members of parliament.
03:36   Without Islam, no criminal organizations such as … Milli Görüs
03:40   and Suleiman, which forms the long Islamic arm of Ankara in the Netherlands;
03:45   arms that should be amputated.
03:50   ——–
04:12   Madam President,
04:14   the long arm of Ankara should be amputated.
04:17   Ban these organizations, just like the organizations associated with
04:21   Fethullah Gülen.
04:23   Expel their leaders – as we call on the minister to do so, and close their offices.
04:27   Is the minister prepared to do this?
04:29   Children at school would not be confronted with halal meat during the
04:33   Christmas dinner, Christmas trees would not be a subject for discussion,
04:36   and the end of Ramadan would not result in empty classrooms.
04:40   Without Islam, no hundreds of thousands Turkish people in the Netherlands who say
04:44   that they do not think that violence against followers of other faiths and non-believers is wrong,
04:49   and no hundreds of thousands Turkish people who think that Islamic Jihad fighters are heroes.
04:54   Without Islam, no problems with Jihad fighters. Without Islam, no
04:58   substantial level of threat concerning terrorism
05:01   and no children rejoicing in the streets after the mass murders in the WTC on 9/11.
05:06   Yes, Madam President, imagine what a wonderful country that would be
05:09   if you could leave all that behind you.
05:13   Ask the minister whether he shares this vision and, if not,
05:16   what vision the minister has concerning the ongoing Islamisation of the Netherlands.
05:22   But of course I do not suggest that everything that is going wrong is the fault of Islam,
05:28   but a very great deal of it is. I have just made that quite clear.
05:32   Imagine a country without all those problems that I mentioned,
05:37   and even though there was immigration in the past from Suriname and
05:40   Jewish people came from Portugal, there is a huge difference with the mass
05:44   immigration of Muslims in the Netherlands. The other immigrants assimilated
05:48   and saw the Netherlands as their new home;
05:51   The Muslims who generally come here do not change
05:55   do not integrate, do not assimilate;
05:57   No, they convert the Netherlands at our expense into their own homeland with all the mosques,
06:02   and the original population are just guests.
06:05   Islamic immigration, the hijra, has been doing things this way
06:09   for 1400 years and that will not change.
06:12   Take a look at the situation in what once was Christian North Africa,
06:15   but take a look too at Marseilles, at Brussels or
06:19   at the Islamic rape hotspot, Rotherham in England.
06:24   We are in an alarming phase, Madam President,
06:27   over the past 40 years no-one has ever seen
06:30   such a change in the demographics.
06:33   In cities such as The Hague, Amsterdam and Rotterdam, more than
06:37   half of the Dutch population has now been replaced by people from other countries,
06:40   mostly Muslim countries.
06:42   The birth rate of Muslims is much higher than that of the Dutch, but in
06:46   France, Belgium and Sweden it is even higher still, and with the open borders, then you know
06:49   enough; in France the birth rate among immigrants is 1.3 and for Muslims 3.5
06:55   which means that within two generations,
06:59   that within two generations the large majority of the population
07:03   will be Muslim. In 2013, the name Mohammed
07:06   and all its variants such as Mohammad,
07:09   Muhammed, Mahmoet was the second most popular name in the Netherlands,
07:14   and this applies not only to the occupied areas in major cities, Madam President,
07:18   that applies for the whole of the Netherlands; the whole of the Netherlands.
07:21   The forecast for 2014 is really a startling one,
07:24   in the first three quarters of this year, Mohammed with all its variants was
07:28   the most common name for newborn boys in this country,
07:32   and there is no reason to believe that this trend will reverse soon.
07:36   The minister cannot avoid responding; what does he think
07:40   the Netherlands will look like in 2025 or in 2030?
07:45   Because if they continue with government policy in this way
07:49   then it will becomes one huge Islamic mess, Madam President;
07:53   the fertile polder will become a desert of clay.
07:56   Muslims, said Bernard Lewis, are not the children of the desert but the fathers.
08:01   Does the minister share this observation from this eminent historian,
08:05   and can the minister indicate how he intends to stop the Islamisation?
08:08   One of the problems, Madam President, that Islam has brought to the Netherlands
08:12   is the increased anti-Semitism. I will give you some national and international examples:
08:17   four Jews were killed last Tuesday by Muslims in a synagogue in Jerusalem,
08:22   while the inhabitants of Gaza celebrate with axes, knives and guns
08:26   in their hands on account of this slaughter. The leaders of Hamas called the criminals heroes,
08:32   and literally right in the middle of the Islamic festivities for this anti-Semitic
08:36   act of terror, the Labour Party proposes to reward these leaders who have
08:40   an incurable hate of Jews with a state of their own!
08:44   The Labour Party (PvdA) should be ashamed.
08:45   It is going too far to call the Labour Party an anti-Semitic party,
08:48   but it certainly looks like they want to accommodate more and more
08:52   the anti-Semitic views of the Muslim voters.
08:56   ——–
14:26   Madam President, Islam is
14:31   bringing anti-Semitism back to Europe; since we were on that subject.
14:34   In Toulouse and Brussels, Jews have been shot and killed by Muslims
14:37   just because they were Jewish. In Amsterdam, because of
14:42   threats by young Muslims you are no longer safe on the streets. Facts, wearing a kippah,
14:47   I mean; that’s a fact.
14:50   And during an anti-Israel demonstration in the Schilderswijk in The Hague a Muslim demonstrator
14:53   said to a reporter, and I quote: “If all Muslims were to form a single front, we would have beaten the West and the Jews
14:59   years ago.” Madam President, to illustrate, last year David Suurland graduated with honours
15:06   on the comparison between Nazism, Communism
15:09   and Islam. Anti-Semitism is inherent in Islam, he also says.
15:14   It would indeed be naive to think that fourteen hundred years of Islamic writings
15:19   inspiring hatred of Jews would remain without consequences,
15:23   and I quote, how often have Bolkestein, Fortuyn, Jansen, Ayaan Hirsi Ali,
15:28   Van Gogh and Wilders been accused of inciting racism
15:32   and been prosecuted?
15:34   When it comes to anti-Semitism among Muslims they were quite right,
15:37   and we haven’t even mentioned the endemic hatred of gays or the intolerance for dissenters and
15:43   apostates, writes Suurland in an article in the NRC newspaper.
15:48   Does the minister subscribe to this interpretation from this researcher and, if not, what
15:52   arguments does Minister Kamp have for this deviant position?
15:57   What does the minister think about the fact that the Islamic preacher Yusuf al-Qaradawi
16:01   who, in 2008, called on the Muslims here in the Netherlands to punish the Jews
16:06   as a follow-up the last great punishment of the Jews by Adolf Hitler?
16:11   and is the minister aware of the fact that the man who brought al-Qaradawi to
16:14   the Netherlands called this Al-Qaradawi a respected authority,
16:19   that this man al-Qaradawi is a reliable and learned man and an example for the
16:23   Islamic community who says inspiring things about Muslims in
16:27   society. What does the minister think of that, Madam President?
16:31   Is the minister also aware of the fact that the man who brought al-Qaradawi here
16:35   draws his inspiration from the books of the inspirer of the Muslim Brotherhood
16:40   and al Qaeda namely Sayyid Qutb,
16:43   who has been called the godfather of terrorism club Takfir w’al-Hijra by
16:47   the Dutch Intelligence Agency, and he claims that the Qur’an is the principal guide for them?
16:53   Does the minister know that? And is the minister aware of the fact that this man, according to two old
16:58   party colleagues has said that you must not do that noticeably well, you should not act too openly,
17:02   you must act secretly, do it quietly.
17:05   Yes, Madam President, I am talking about
17:07   party colleague Thyssen from the Labour Party, the right hand of
17:10   this minister Mr Marcouch,
17:12   and I will tell you, whoever votes for Asscher at the next elections
17:16   will get Mr Marcouch for free; they are sitting together on the tandem.
17:22   Marcouch is running hard in the direction of the complete Islamisation of society.
17:26   Asscher doesn’t run because the cables have been cut.
17:29   And criticism, Madam President, of the hatred of Jews sanctioned by Islam,
17:33   the hate towards gays, women and dissenters,
17:36   the hostility to Western standards and values, democracy and the rule of law,
17:39   the rejection of those and the glorification of violence
17:42   is labeled by the followers of Islam and those who agree with this ideology
17:46   ‘Islamophobia’, dismissed
17:49   as if you have a phobia,
17:52   dismissed away because you dislike Islam.
17:55   This is nothing more than an instrument from the politically correct box of tricks,
17:58   Madam President, to silence criticism of Islam,
18:02   to pollute the debate, and to accelerate the destruction of Western society.
18:09   ——
21:39   ‘How dreadful are the curses
21:44   which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
21:48   Besides the fanatical frenzy,
21:50   which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog,
21:54   there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.’
21:57   And that was not De Graaf who said this, Madam President, I quote Mr Winston Churchill.
22:02   But soon, since I was talking about Islamophobia before the introduction from
22:06   Mr Kerstmis all that will be prohibited if it is left to the Labour Party.
22:09   Criticism of Islam is in fact justified,
22:12   and generally not wrong, and not by the first person to come along.
22:16   Hence Churchill is in good company with others, Maimonides, also
22:19   known as Ramban, Erasmus, Voltaire and ????,
22:24   all men who promoted Western civilization through research through debate.
22:29   Those who all too easily make use of the term Islamophobia
22:33   serve the opposite purpose: namely the decline of our society
22:38   and the promotion of ignorance,
22:41   as censorship on the path towards Islamic dictatorship.
22:45   Does the minister share this view or not
22:47   and we would also like a reasoned statement of the opinion of the
22:51   minister concerning this. Madam President, being polite is a choice, being threatened is not,
22:54   and there as far as the PVV is concerned
22:57   is a very clear distinction; verbal criticism is allowed,
23:01   but violence and threats of violence are totally unacceptable.
23:05   The law provides sufficient resources to tackle the latter.
23:08   Comparing criticism of Islam to robbery, for example, once more lifts the tip
23:12   of the veil on what apparently is the opinion within the Labour Party of our fundamental rights.
23:18   The holy war that the Labour Party, Madam President, I have named him already, Mr Marcouch
23:21   is conducting against alleged ‘Islamophobia’
23:24   is the struggle against freedom of speech.
23:26   It leads to the criminalization of any discussion about Islam
23:30   and thus in the long term to the criminalization of any discussion
23:34   of every religion. What will Islam still allow you to say?
23:38   That you can live quite well without religion?
23:41   Or that Christianity is fine, is that not an insult to Islam?
23:45   Criminalization of so-called Islamophobia therefore leads directly to the end of religious freedom
23:51   and even more to the end of freedom of speech.
23:54   Once again I ask the minister if he agrees with me and if not,
23:58   we would like a reasoned, clearly reasoned standpoint from the Minister.
24:02   As I said earlier, Madam President, in the Netherlands
24:05   a demographic disaster awaits us,
24:06   an undesirable cultural revolution that is unparalleled,
24:10   via the replacement of the population.
24:12   In the coming decades the
24:15   immigrant population will continue to grow,
24:17   in contrast to the indigenous population.
24:20   from 3.5 million in January 2013 to 504 million in 2060 this increases the number of,
24:27   the proportion of immigrants from 21 to 31 percent and the percentage of non-Western
24:32   immigrants rises the most from almost 12 to more than 18 percent
24:37   and that concerns only non-Western immigrants of the first and second generation,
24:42   and that does not give the full picture of this dramatic situation,
24:46   the third generation is fudged out of the statistics and
24:49   added to the native population. And what is taken off one is added to the other.
25:02   The number of Moroccans in the third generation alone, the third generation
25:05   is quadrupled between 2000 and 2012,
25:09   and according to the Central Statistics Office this trend
25:12   will to continue at the same rate in the years to come.
25:15   Given the persistent negative statistics in the third generation, too,
25:19   and despite pouring money into integration projects, urban renewal,
25:23   advances for language lessons, allotments in the Schilderswijk and free WiFi,
25:27   there is little prospect of improvement.
25:29   The Moroccan problem that we have in the Netherlands will not decrease,
25:32   but rather increase, and we can only hope that with this policy
25:36   the increase is not exponential.
25:39   The schools are seeing an avalanche of children who are named after Muhammad.
25:44   We are going to see the majority of all children at school being Islamic,
25:48   and that is certainly, that is truly not a pleasant prospect, Madam President, the Dutch
25:52   identity, the identity and culture is being destroyed by immigration and through the uterus.
25:58   Various Islamic leaders literally said that, such as Gaddafi,
26:02   but apart from the PVV no-one is taking it seriously.
26:05   The annual integration report
26:08   is quite clear about it; there never was any integration, there is no integration, and there
26:11   never will be any integration either,
26:13   or does the minister think that things won’t happen so quickly?
26:16   If so, what does he think the near future will look like?
26:19   Madam President, more than halfway.
26:21   He who pays the piper calls the tune does not apply,
26:25   unfortunately, for multiculinarism is a fine thing as such,
26:29   but it does not bring integration any closer,
26:31   just as multiculturalism doesn’t.
26:35   Now that the multicultural society is generally seen to have failed it is time for the next step,
26:39   the replacement of a policy focused on integration with a policy focused on assimilation.
26:45   Amongst other things, the integration policy has led to an Islamic parallel
26:49   society and has increased the contrast
26:52   in Dutch society. Open borders, the multicultural ideology.
26:57   The integration policy, the all too easily given benefits to immigrants,
27:02   these are harmful matters that are deeply anchored in cultural relativistic and cultural
27:07   Marxist epidemic that has afflicted the West for many decades.
27:11   Even worse, Madam President, cultural Marxism is one of the biggest causes
27:14   of the soft policy on migration and migrants, and thus
27:18   immigration itself. It has caused a blind spot in the eyes of socialists,
27:22   but also Christian and liberal politicians
27:25   who defend Islam from the standpoint of a supposed benefit.
27:30   Liberals see the arrival of a workforce, but the PVV sees that the coffee houses are full during work hours.
27:36   Socialists see Islam as a means of staying in power,
27:39   but in 1979 we saw how Ayatollah Khomeini made such deft use of them
27:44   to come to power, but after that had the socialists hanged first.
27:49   Christians see Muslims as brothers in faith and fall into the trap of that small step that
27:54   leads from Christianity to Islam, but the PVV sees the step from Islam to Christianity
27:59   is “rewarded” (in quotation marks) with death, there is a death sentence for that,
28:04   but we also see that many Christian politicians failed to fight against what they call in their
28:09   profession of faith, false prophets and false province,
28:12   and in that they are expertly helped by the leaders of the Protestant
28:15   Church in the Netherlands, and I am telling you that they are making a great mistake,
28:19   and that’s actually a travesty that a secular party such as the PVV
28:23   has to save their skins from the Islamic hellfire.
28:28   Liberals in the Netherlands, Madam President, should put an end to their relaxed
28:31   attitude of “they can believe what they want as long as they don’t bother me”,
28:35   because that can no longer be tolerated. With that attitude they place liberalism in serious danger themselves
28:40   and the socialists in the Netherlands, well sorry, I don’t know what to say about them,
28:46   we will have to come up with a solution for that. and I have already talked about culture-relativistic group of people.
28:51   Madame President, in conclusion, the message should be clear;
28:54   the Netherlands must be de-Islamised, all mosques must be closed,
29:00   especially the Wester Mosque in Amsterdam,
29:03   by the city council of the minister, who at that time was still a member of
29:06   the city council at the will of members the Wester mosque was built with millions in hidden subsidies.
29:12   The mega-mosque in Gouda, now postponed for six months, probably because of the
29:16   elections so that the parties in power do not suffer any damage, must not ever be built,
29:22   just like that thing in Groningen, in Selwerd, a disgusting place.
29:27   The only vacant property that makes the Netherlands better is empty mosques. When is the minister going to organize that?
29:34   I’m almost done, Madam President; the integral approach to Jihadism is a farce.
29:38   Jihadists must be expelled from the country and never allowed back,
29:41   even if you only have one passport
29:44   the borders must be closed to people from Islamic countries,
29:46   the government must commit itself to voluntary emigration to Muslim countries,
29:50   criminals with a double passport must be expelled, and only if these
29:53   measures are implemented will the Netherlands see a positive change. The problems are
29:58   obvious and so are the causes of these problems,
30:02   and we therefore call on the minister
30:04   to tackle the problems and do what needs to be done, because looking the other way, placation and
30:08   appeasement are no longer an option.
30:09   En garde, I say to the minister. Thank you.

38 thoughts on “Imagine There’s No Islam — It’s Easy If You Try!

  1. Yes. Excellent indeed.

    Alas, removal only of jihadis will still leave the essence of the problem in the Netherlands. The Muslims who remain will pose the same dangers and be the same hostile presence as described by Mr. de Graaf. Muslims will never assimilate and have no desire to do so. They will never accept laws superior to the shariah.

    As the Baron has earlier accurately observed, Islam is the perfect closed system. It is antithetical to the openness of Western society and hostile to it in every respect. The Turkish experiment in internal reform and neutralization of the Islamic essence failed. The option available to Western societies for their survival is stark — complete repatriation, voluntary or involuntary.

    • Our elected Traitor Class made such a mess of the principles of democracy that we, who elected them to abuse us, and glorify islam, now have to go after them and clean up.

  2. The truth, shining out in all its glory! Thank you for posting the video and the translation, and may God bless you. Happy Christmas!

  3. Talk is cheap. blablablablablabla and the process of cultural and racial eradication continues and is increasing. Nobody does a thing. The Bleather Generation. The tide is almost in and all they do is discuss it as they drown with “Oh how terrible! But I’m not Islamophobic!” In Switzerland these young thicks voted to extend immigration and guarantee their own extinction.

    • Democracy means do what people want and give them what they demand.
      Now we know that’s utter nonsense. If people knew their own interests and were clever democracy would have been the norm and would have been existing since eternity.
      Oh by the way, why Jesus did not mention democracy?

      • Jesus was a savior, not a politician. He was concerned with our souls, not our ideologies.

        • True.
          But one not-so-minor quibble with this powerful speech: Christians cannot and do not give a pass to Islam, unless said Christians are of the liberal, heretical variety — which sadly includes the majority of today’s Christian denominations and also of the Roman church, now in obvious disarray since the installation of their pretend pope.
          That the church has abandoned the Bible is the single greatest threat to Western Civilization; Islam and Marxism rush in to fill the void. I would call it civilizational suicide rooted in rejection of the transcendent — the worship of self and materialism.

          • I agree in principle, Harriet, since I am a Christian who unashamedly thinks that the Three Forms of Unity as received at Dordrecht, Netherlands in 1619 A.D. are an excellent summary of what the Bible teaches.

            But, being also of an ethnically blended American family, I am very sensitive to Paul’s statements that in Jesus Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek; or John, who saw both the saving remnant of ethnic Israel in Heaven right alongside the redeemed out of “every people, tongue, and nation” (Rev. 7).

            Yes, even though I read the Bible in both English and Chinese, Kipling was on to something when he said that “East is East and West is West, and never the twain shall meet, Until both East and West shall stand before God’s Judgment Seat.” However, he forgot that in Christ’s death on the Cross, all the elect, Jew or Greek, East and West, had their own sins judged and buried — so the two can and do meet in Christ.

    • The Swiss vote was truly stupid and a ticket to extinction. But you can’t tell a bunch of greedy and short sighted people they are essentially supporting a policy that will lead their country to impoverishment and they and their children into a slavery.

      Look at that lady who was just killed in Abu Dhabi, she was attracted by the money and supposed “culture” even though the country uses slaves and is a pest hole. You’d think that the slavery aspect would keep supposedly intelligent and decent people from taking jobs over there, but it doesn’t.

      Western people won’t really learn until there daily occurrences of what happened to Corporal Rigby.

  4. Nope they’ll just become good Moslems and adopt the burka. I see it already in UK.

  5. This is great! Such truth spoken about islam in parliament-unheard of not long ago. This needs to snowball!

  6. May I mention the west’s unmentionable thing?
    Ok kick out islam. And then what?
    Without some type of faith, say Christianity, the society will degenerate into nothingness by its own inborn destructive mechanisms and dynamism.
    Self -preservation and self-destruction.

    Can I opine that Christianity and Judaism ( and I think Hinduism, Bahaism, …) promote the self – preservation good gene through prayer (meditation), and fasting (Lent). But not islam, which is a completely different zebra. “be harsh to kuffar and kind among thyselves” That’s is why?

    Lent fasting and Contemplation about altruism go together. So that people (e.g. The Dutch or English ) will forget about their selfishness and defend each other instead. Or sacrifice themselves for each other. “Love each other as I have loved you” and don’t listen to the future false prophets.

    Europe rejected Christianity and Judaism because they thought both were bad. They tried to show that they have “born again” secularists who can live with anyone even as diabolical as islam. So they imported jihadi invaders and created a new cult called multiculti to prove their point.
    Now when they talk about multi culti they mean only islam.

    Absence of Christianity and Judaism in Europe ( spiritual emptiness) and vacuous thinking gave way the aggressive, fierce islam.
    The Traitor Class cannot confess to their horrible mistake.

    • Murad, it’s perfectly possible to have a decent moral code, and an appreciation of one’s culture, without religious belief.

      • Sorry, Mark, but I agree with Murad. Knowing full well that Bach wrote for the service of the Lutheran Church (even though I am myself of the Reformed persuasion), which did much to recover congregational singing in the West, I find the modern renditions of his work, in which the chorale part is indistinct and drowned out by the instrumental accompaniment, to be soulless. There are only a few good renditions I’ve heard. Further, the rich development of vernacular literatures in the Western world would not have been possible without the Reformation encouraging a whole culture to know the Word of God–and with the Bible now scoffed at as a relic for **Ugh!-fundamentalists!, our society is becoming less and less literate (I see that as a teacher).

        As for the moral code, I’m sorry, but I’m old enough to have learned from campus radicals to use “fag” as the ultimate insult for a man; yet these same people would prosecute me for hate speech if I used as they did back then (even though they are admirers of Castro, for whom *marri–n* is still the prized dismissive insult). The same are quick to decry their opponents as folks who’d “dehumanize the other”–yet also freely cry “smash the Fascist insect!” Who “dehumanizes” whom? They cry rivers of tears over someone unfortunate to be caught red-handed after committing multiple murders in Texas, and hence sits on Death Row; while at the same time they make the murder of children whose only crime is to be inconvenient into the sacrament of responsible womanhood.

        We in the West have been so demoralized by the crowd that thinks it’s “moral and decent” in its open defiance of the Christian God that we are now prey to a religion and culture that has produced nothing but slums surrounded by deserts and a culture which, denying original sin, arrogates to itself the right to commit every sin there is (at least the powerful males among them).

        And who leads the pack in surrendering to Islamic demands? The same Militant Godless wannabes. Yes, prosecute a Christian caterer who won’t service a homosexual “wedding”; but let’s just see them demand that a halal one barbecue a whole hog.

        • Kepha, I’m a huge classical music fan, as you seem to be, but I believe poor renditions of Bach owe more to some of the “historically informed performance practice” merchants, who get so bogged down in, dare I say, “politically correct” details that they lose sight of the message, than any loss of faith per se.

        • It’s rather amazing that the same secular crowd that leads the assault on Christianity welcomes Islam with open arms here in the West.

          One gets the distinct impression from them that they are ashamed of Western Civilization and Christianity and want to see it done away with.

        • This doesn’t really merit a reply, Lighten up, except to say you haven’t been paying attention.

      • Saying we don’t need religion is a cop out. Have we forgotten everything as in “How’s the Soviet Union doing these days?” Spain did not exactly go downhill after it imagined a country without its Muslim dis-ease and their mohammedan garbage.
        Nice guys come last.

  7. Mr de Graaf, while giving an outstanding speech, will be protrayed as too accurate to be believed, too grave to be taken seriously and too patriotic to country and tradition to not be a “racist.” And so, the acceleration of Islam’s penetration and the increase in host-nation jizya will proceed.

    The multicult daydream is an Islamic monocult nightmare.

    • Did you see how many legislators were there to actually listen to his speech? Very few.
      While I agree with absolutely everything he had to say it seems to be falling on deaf ears.

      • What Mr de Graaf stated are all known axioms. And it is true that the Traitor Class do not wish to listen to truths awakening us to the deadly danger surrounding us.
        Did we invite invaders to show them how advanced we were in civilization?
        Well, they are showing us how advanced we are in stupidity, childishness and naivete.
        Traitor Class brains are so fossilized that you have to explain to them even the plainly obvious.

      • I saw the whole debate in Dutch. Although few were present ( not unusual in the Dutch parliament though) It did not fall on deaf ears as quite a few lefties challenged him, they ended up in my view looking foolish.
        one woman walked off to the back, arms crossed and actually childishly pouted ! The always smug Muslim woman had a go and so did two others, men. They attacked and belittled Him but he did not budge, stayed calm and would not retract a single statement.
        The pouting woman wagged her finger sanctimoniously at him and demanded he retracted that her labour party for recognising Palestine were anti semitic . He refused.
        That really got to her noticeably !
        He intimidated them for sure inspite of their smugness and obvious relish in challenging him. Was not a victory, but certainly did not fall onto deaf ears.

        Here is another wonderful European, a young member of the Sweden Democrats although we can’t see anyone present there at all. !)

        Scroll down to see video.
        I do not share the same hope though as some others that the left is exactly losing. Not yet.
        But more sane people are mustering the courage to speak out boldly snd truthfully and that is a start.

    • For the rootless Muslim parasites it’s a dream. And we are doing all the work for them.

  8. “Madam President, to illustrate, last year David Suurland graduated with honours on the comparison between Nazism, Communism and Islam.”

    Does anyone know, if David Suurland’s PhD (or preferably an English version of it) is available anywhere publicly, for people to read?

  9. I have valiantly been trying to imagine there is no Islam since 10 AM 9/11/01 To no avail. But learning..and learning every day. What I have learned makes me sick at heart for all our countries in the Free World. No reason to give up, my parents and their generation did not want to confront the Nazis after coming out of the Great Depression, but they did, valiantly, and won. We must take heart.

    • Thank you. These evil people are in your face everywhere. The dam must break soon. Even our SUVs and HGVs are now seen as Mosquito busters.

Comments are closed.