The Lib-Dems Man the Barricades Against FGM

Actually, I don’t think the Lib-Dems would ever “man” anything, since that would be an unacceptably sexist usage of the language. Would they “person” the barricades instead? Or perhaps “occupy” them…?

Anyway, for our American readers, the Liberal Democrats (colloquially known as the “Lib-Dems”) are a British political party. They are part of the current governing coalition, and their party leader (Nick Clegg) is Deputy Prime Minister under PM David Cameron.

Until the recent local and European elections, when they were so roundly trounced by UKIP, the Lib-Dems were one of the “Big Three” parties in the UK. At the moment, however, they are in the process of being consigned to the recycling bin of history.

It’s hard to find an American analogue for the Lib-Dems. They are very politically correct, and ultra-supportive of gay issues and Multiculturalism, yet they are allied with the Conservatives in the present government. However, the Tories aren’t “conservative” in any fashion that an American would recognize, and are barely distinguishable from their coalition partners.

Our British reader and commenter Mark H has previously reported on emails that he has sent to his MP, Simon Hughes, who is a well-known Lib-Dem politician. Mark’s latest attempt to contact the Hon. Mr. Hughes was through an online petition about female genital mutilation (FGM). Surprisingly enough, the distinguished Member sent a belated answer to his constituent.

Before posting Mr. Hughes’ response, I’d like to point out that the practice of FGM has long been a crime in the UK. It was made a criminal offense in 1985, and a more stringent law against it was passed in 2003. Yet the first prosecutions under either of those laws were not announced until March of this year, when two culturally-enriched doctors were charged under the 2003 act (their case has a Mohammed Coefficient of 50%) — eleven years after this important piece of landmark legislation was passed.

It is estimated that in any given year, between six thousand and twenty thousand girls under the age of sixteen are at risk of forced FGM in Britain. The number of those who have already been mutilated is obviously hard to come by, but according to some reports it may be over 100,000. Despite these ghastly numbers, and after nearly thirty years of illegality, there have only been two prosecutions for carrying out FGM, and those only a few weeks ago.

Bear these facts in mind when reading the earnest assurances of the Hon. Simon Hughes, MP for Bermondsey and Old Southwark, about the Lib-Dems’ formidable determination to end the practice of female genital mutilation:

Thank you for your e-mail asking me to support the campaign to end female genital mutilation (FGM). I sincerely apologise for delay in providing you with a response but my office continues to receive a large number of requests for help.

FGM in the UK and around the world is an issue of great concern to me. FGM serves no medical purpose and leads to many severe impacts throughout life, having physical, psychological and socio-economic consequences. The practice is not required or recommended by any religion and is instead a cultural practice. The UK Prohibition of Female Circumcision Act 1985 makes it an offence to carry out FGM or aid, abet or procure the services of another person. The Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 then went further and makes it an offence for FGM to be performed anywhere in the world on UK permanent residents of any age and carries a maximum sentence of 14 years imprisonment.

As chair of governors of a local school, I fully appreciate the responsibility schools have in educating young people about the true nature of cultural issues such as FGM. I was therefore very glad to see that Michael Gove MP has agreed to help Fahma Mohamed’s campaign to end the practice by writing to every school headteacher around the country with guidance for teachers on keeping children safe. This guidance covers:

  • what is known about the prevalence of FGM, in the UK and abroad
  • factors which increase the risk of a schoolchild in the UK becoming a victim of FGM
  • indications that a child may have been a victim of FGM
  • the existing statutory safeguarding duties of teachers and other school staff in relation to FGM.

A full statement by Michael Gove MP on his meeting with Fahma and what was agreed can be found here.

Additionally, Liberal Democrat MP Lynne Featherstone, who is Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for International Development in the Department for International Development (DFID), is aiming to eradicate FGM around the world within a generation. Like foot-binding in China, it is possible to end these practices which cause such suffering for girls and women.

Lynne Featherstone MP wants to see tackling FGM recognised internationally as part of the mainstream development agenda, and for other countries and donors to support the elimination of the practice. At the Commission on the Status of Women at the UN in 2013, she pledged up to £35 million to help reduce FGM by 30% in at least ten countries within the next five years. This funding will be used directly within local communities, as well as working with foreign governments and traditional leaders to back laws ending FGM. It will fund research into the most cost-effective approaches to tackling the problem, to make sure the work has the biggest impact. Lynne Featherstone MP is also working with other Liberal Democrats in government on this such as Norman Baker MP in the Home Office and David Laws MP in the Department for Education, to make certain that the issue gets the cross-departmental attention it needs.

I do thank you for raising this issue with me and I apologise again for the delay in getting back to you. I hope that my reply has addressed at least some of your concerns and reassured you that the Liberal Democrats are doing all we can to eradicate this awful practice around the world. If you have any further questions, or if I can be of any additional assistance on this or any other matter where members of parliament have responsibility, please do not hesitate to contact me again.

Yours sincerely



Rt Hon Simon Hughes MP
MP for Bermondsey and Old Southwark

15 thoughts on “The Lib-Dems Man the Barricades Against FGM

  1. Actually, I don’t think the Lib-Dems would ever “man” anything, since that would be an unacceptably sexist usage of the language. Would they “person” the barricades instead? Or perhaps “occupy” them…?

    They would probably Vagina the barriers…

      • That’s a good link. Lots of information. Looks to be circa 2011?

        A survey of police forces by the Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation (IKWRO) found there were 2,823 incidences of honour crimes a year, or almost eight a day. But those figures are considered a vast underestimate given that 13 of 52 police forces did not respond to the charity’s request for a breakdown in November 2011.

        Nazir Afzal of the Crown Prosecution Service said the degree of honour crime in Britain – including murders meant to preserve a family’s “honour” within their own community – was unknown.

        “We don’t know the true figure of honour killings. It’s anything between 10 and 12 a year in this country. I don’t know how many other unmarked graves there are in this country in our green and pleasant land.”

        Mr Afzal estimates that there are 10,000 forced marriages in Britain every year, and said a measure of multicultural sensitivity was likely part of the problem.
        “Forced marriage is the earthquake and what’s followed is a tsunami of domestic abuse, sexual abuse, child protection issues, suicide and murder.

        “If we can tackle forced marriage then we can prevent all these other things from happening.”

  2. There is a lot of legislation in the UK much of it referring to the unacceptable activities of ethnic minorities with backward cultures. Unfortunately these laws remain unenforced because they do apply to ethnic minorities and enforcement might have detrimental effects on community cohesion. In reality of course, there is no community cohesion and non enforcement is merely appeasement of the religion of peace.

  3. Simon Hughes – who can be seen on You Tube grovelling before a Muslim audience and telling them he wants them to lead us – is wrong when he says that FGM has nothing to do with religion. In a Hadith, Mohammad himself recommends the practice as long as the cutting is not too severe.

    • “In a Hadith, Mohammad himself recommends the practice as long as the cutting is not too severe.”

      In the Reliance of the Traveller, the manual of sharia law, it states that for all 4 schools of islamic jurisprudence, FGM ranges between “obligatory” and “desirable”. So much for it being “a cultural practice”.

      The LibDem Equalities Minister, Lyn Featherstone, was savaged on the BBC’s Newsnight, by a group of young Somali muslim women. The young women effectively accused this “liberal” Equalities Minsiter of racism, given her complacency over FGM. The only person who was in agreement with the Equalities Minister in the entire group of 30 or so participants, was (surprise, surprise) a Somali muslim man. I believe the video of this encounter is on YouTube.

      Moreover, statistical analysis of news articles discussing FGM in the UK in the past 15 years or so, prove conclusively that this subject was being ignored, until the rise of the EDL put it on the agenda.

      See this chart for an overview of the evidence for this claim.

  4. FGM in the UK and around the world is an issue of great concern to me.

    Which is why he supports mass immigration by communiddies that practise it. That way, the problem gets bigger in the west and anti-FGM money that would go a lot further in the third world is used in the west instead. This applies to problems like AIDS and resistant TB too.

    Liberals can’t grasp the logic of their own policies. But then, reality doesn’t matter to them. What’s important is being “concerned” in front of their peers.

  5. Is there a twist to this story where the prosecution may have been instigated not for performing a FGM but for attempting to repair the damage done by an earlier FGM atrocity?

  6. Would this be the same Simon Hughes in the video below?

    I have reason therefore to question his commitment to eliminate barbaric “cultural” practices.

    Oh, he’s homosexual too….I wonder what FGM’ers cultural attitudes to that would be?

    The culture in my own head (which is where all culture ultimately resides) has no problem with it by the way.

    The phrase “useful idiot” comes to mind.

    • He’s a homosexual who won his parliamentary seat in a constituency which had voted Labour for the previous 60 years.

      Hughes was competing against Peter Tatchell who was a Labour candidate, and the “Liberals” conducted the most homophobic campaign in British political history.

      Some years later the brave “Liberal Democrat” Simon Hughes was revealed to be “bisexual”. As time has gone on, all this history is ignored, and Huges is declared to be “gay”. I believe these events tell us all we need to know about the integrity of Simon Hughes.

  7. P.S. I was referring to my own attitude to homosexuality by the way. I think the way I worded it could have been misconstrued.

  8. The MP’s letter shows a profound mischaracterization of FGM as not being required by any religion. If we accept that Islam is treated as a religion in most places, the hadiths evidently do require circumcision of the female (, I hope Mark H was able to point this out to the MP forcefully!

  9. “Is there a twist to this story where the prosecution may have been instigated not for performing a FGM but for attempting to repair the damage done by an earlier FGM atrocity?”

    Yes indeed. In fact, in this first prosecution which received so much attention, the doctor concerned appears to be an infidel (surprise, surprise!). It appears he was asked to carry out the re-stitching at the request of the family:

Comments are closed.