Our British correspondent JP sent a tip this morning about what I’ve been referring to since as the “dog jihad” video. The woman featured in the video — which was taken by her friend on a smart phone — was confronted by a culturally enriched Tower Hamlets Enforcement Officer (THEO), who accused her of violating the borough’s dog-fouling law while walking her dog in the park. She denied the charge — she had cleaned up after her dog — and demanded that he “show me the poo”, which he refused to do.
THEOs are not civilians, but they are not full police officers, either. This one had to call for police backup to handle these two dangerous women and their dogs. The real police decided that the woman had committed no offense, and did not charge her.
(For the full story of the dog poo incident, see The Evening Standard or Metro.)
The “dog jihad”, like the parking jihad, the alcohol jihad, and all the other tactics employed by zealous Muslims in the neighborhoods where they dominate, is yet another aspect of block-busting. It serves to annoy and inconvenience the kuffar. It makes them uncomfortable and anxious in the streets and parks near their own homes. They learn to conform outwardly to sharia norms, or they move away to escape the harassment. Either outcome is satisfactory from the point of view of the sharia-compliance enforcers.
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for leveling the sound and uploading this video:
Watch the original video here.
JP includes more information below, and speculates about other possible motives for the THEO’s behavior besides sharia-enforcement.
More on THEOs
Too easy to jump to conclusions after watching the dog-fouling YouTube video and rush to see it as a case of Islamic harassment of Judeo-Christian dog-walkers, which perhaps it is. But worth bearing in mind that the zealous enforcement officer might possibly be motivated to an equal or greater extent by performance-pay-driven targets — the more citizens he apprehends and fines, the greater his take-home pay. Perhaps. Still, it leaves an uncomfortable impression of the potential for abuse inherent in this political police force, a point hinted at in the Daily Express article from 2009 linked to below, and from which I have extracted the key points.
But then we have the Tower Hamlets Poop Scoop Law — is this not excessively zealous and might it not be evidence of an Islamic prejudice against dogs and dog-owners? Note the tone and language used at the council’s Poop Scoop Law webpage (key words emphasised by this writer):
- vigorous enforcement of the Dogs (Fouling of Land) Act
- clean up must be immediate
- plain clothes/vehicle patrols used to check whether owners complying with the law
- A team of four dog wardens patrol the streets seven days a week
- Average fine between 1 Apr 2007 and 31 Mar 2008 was £87 plus £88 costs.
Compare with Westminster Council’s Dog Fouling webpage — calm, reasonable, down-to-earth.
Recently, the Labour opposition at Tower Hamlets submitted a motion condemning Mayor Lutfur Rahman’s failure to crack down on crime. From the Show me the poo YouTube video we might get an inkling where Mayor Rahman’s priorities lie.
THEOs — Key points
- Growing trend by councils to assemble their own mini-police forces, accountable to politicians rather than the public.
- They have no powers of arrest but can demand names and addresses to issue fines. Refusal to comply can be a criminal offence.
- Paid for by council taxpayers, this “third tier” of policing raises money for town hall budgets by fining people at least £50 for dropping litter, offensive behaviour or allowing dogs to foul the pavement.
- Dermot Lineham, Croyden Council, told his enforcement officers to stay clear of anyone looking threatening, telling them instead: “focus activities on adults who are less likely to attack and more likely to pay fixed penalty notices.”
People who let their dogs crap on the pavement ought to be [summarily dealt with in a painful fashion]. I’m as white as a pint of milk and as anti-Islam as anyone could be, but I’ll happily put on my Caterpillar boots and volunteer for that job.
The whole point of this is that the woman did NOT let her dog foul anywhere — she had cleaned up the poo.
She was accosted by Officer Khan for the revenue her fine would bring, or for hassling the kaffir, or both.
Watch the video, for crying out loud.
The woman was very logical and truthful: she insisted on [the foolish despised person] to show her the evidence : The dog poo. He did not come even near that or even discuss it. He should be prosecuted for harassment and bad behaviour. But the GREAT QUESTION IS: Who will dare to do that? No consequences for him. He knows that.
I was making a general point – I didn’t add the rest of what I was thinking – that if that jumped up little … poo … harassed me and my dog, he would have been on the receiving end of the aforementioned Cats, then I would have set the dog on him.
Because if there’s one thing in this world that I reallycan’t abide, it’s jumped up council employees who go around telling people what they can and can’t do – again, on general principle.
It really is one of the worst features of British life. And if cultural enrichers hijack what’s already a total pain in the poop-chute and make it worse …
I think I’ll go and buy a couple of Rottweilers and a new pair of DeWalts …
German shepards really don’t like cultural enrichers and I am surprised that ladies Shepard didn’t have a field day with Haji.
So that would be like, my overall position on the subject of dog poop and council jobsworths – they’re on a par with one another.
Years ago now I had a bit of a set-to with the Times of Malta, who had reported on a bunch of cultural enrichers praying on the seafront at Sliema. This didn’t go over too well with the locals, some of which decided to walk their dogs at the same time as they rolled out their mats on the pavement (in what is an extremely busy public area) – and the police moved the dogwalkers on!
If you click through the links to the Standard you get a good picture of what is going on in London.
An UNNAMED spokesman for the Council said that the “Borough” takes dog fouling seriously. That the dog “barked” at the THEO (Theological Vice n’ Virtue Police?)
Then scroll down and see what this THEO is too cowardly to police:
Three unnamed Croydon teens stab other unnamed teen.
The Muslims are harrowing honest Britons out of the area through rape, harrassment, robbery and murder.
Honestly, what [in tarnation] is wrong with folks that don’t just tell [persons I disparage] like this to [remove themselves speedily from their presence]!
There is a “peak cap” mentality in the UK. To some extent it has always been there whereby someone with the impedimenta of officialdom is accorded far more respect than they are entitled and they fequently exceed their authority as a consequence. Before I retired two years ago I spent the previous twenty years as a self employed contractor working with a number of London Local Authorites. I spent two years with the City of Westminster and saw a job description for traffic enforcement officers which required the post holder to meet certain financial targets – ie the more tickets he wrote the more he was paid. Obviously there is an additional issue in Tower Hamlets which involves harassment of the Kuffar. I never worked in that borough but a colleague did and there was a strong anti British, anti western, anti Christian, anti white ethos. I am sure that a 6ft 6 black male exercising his pit bull would not have had this trouble
Because the tyrannical, uniformed, intellectually challenged, commission-remunerated little Jobsworth is a Muslim and therefor as she is white and English her actions are, a priori, Racist if he decides they are and alleges accordingly**.
Hence after decades of oppression and intimidatory brainwashing the victim intuitively knows that if she as a freeborn native decided to exercise her no longer existent right to speak her mind or defend herself in any way that could be described as verbally robust she would be declared a non-person, her children (and her dog) taken away and she would be locked up and the key thrown away.
**I kid you not, the law is quite clear on this – it is written such that the accusation of a ‘Hate Crime’ is sufficient unto itself and leaves the Police and the CPS no alternative but to take the case to Court irrespective of whether or not there is any substantiating evidence.
Once in Court the accused, if white and non-Muslim, finds him or herself fighting for freedom against a stacked deck in an unstated but all pervasive atmosphere of ‘guilty until proven innocent’, rather than the traditional reverse. (And this after the threats and psychological pressures imposed upon them if they have been unfortunate to be held under remand!)
This abomination is one of the most iniquitous laws ever placed upon the Statute books and it is designed and applied in order to prevent the native British people in any way objecting to their ethnic cleansing. Its immediate annulment should be a foundation stone of the manifesto of and a motivating mantra for any and all of a yet to arise Revolutionary Resistance.
This young Lady was very lucky that this episode of Honour Policing did not attract more R attention.
Sharia inspired Honour Policing is not only of the enrichers but has infected all of British society, dare you to glance the wrong way at a private security guard or a low life government bureaucrat and the intent of the prosecution will be Honour Policing.
Muslim is quasi religious cult, not a race. People of every colour succumb to it.
I know, white people can become Muslims just as easily as anyone else – if people insist that commenting on Islam is racist, that means that what THEY are saying is that Islam only has followers of certain races & that Islam excludes people of other races – in short, THEY are saying that Islam is racist. That is a curious position for THEM to adopt, since they apparently believe that racism is “a bad thing”.
This is also rooted in ethnic conflict as much as theological and religious bigotry.
Pingback: News links for Jan 29 2014 – 2 | Vlad Tepes
She’s a handsome lass and might have a sexual harrassment counter case. Ahmed there looked like he had another agenda, beyond the Muslim K9phobia.
“Dermot Lineham, Croyden Council, told his enforcement officers to stay clear of anyone looking threatening, telling them instead: “focus activities on adults who are less likely to attack and more likely to pay fixed penalty notices.””
So, indigenous Westerners are NOT allowed to profile Muslims who are BOMBING people, but Muslims are positively encouraged to profile – and fine with the jizya – indigenous Westerners who are walking their dogs….
Especially women who are less likely to attack….
Especially white people who are more likely to be employed and thus pay fines….
Anyone caught in the dog hating entrapment should be certain to get a DNA sample of the poop in question before paying anything to anyone. In this case there isn’t even any poop to be seen, nothing other than a dog wandering around off leash in the background. Is it her dog? Who knows?
Yes, under English law this is a clear case of well documented harassment. Chances are he picked the most likely target in much the same way that rapists do, by body language, and he has made a calculated bet that in all likelihood she will not doing anything about his – pardon the pun – hounding of her without any evidence. Since she was on the defensive, by her own admission, and since she did not even try to lay any charges of warrantless harassment, as she goes on to describe in “Show me the poop” parts 2 & 3 even the police did not hold this harasser accountable for his actions. They only speak to what she approaches them to defend, and then pronounce that she has done nothing wrong (under his sharia laws). What is wrong with this picture? She is made to justify herself while he is not? She herself needed and still needs to submit an official file numbered complaint. This is no different than any street pan handler chasing her all over a public park.
They are going to have to modify the dog mess laws. A dog taking a crap in the park isn’t the same as a dog crapping on a pavement.
This is clearly low grade jihad now. The law is supposed to protect and accommodate women, children, the old. It’s not a way to wheedle cash out of women like her. Or at least it shouldn’t be. She probably wouldn’t even have a dog if Muslim men were not prowling around Tower Hamlets anyway. Single women can’t carry a gun, they need snarling dogs instead.
In many islamic countries I have visited, it is the local people themselves who defecate in the streets and nobody harasses them to clean up afterwards
A jumped up council worker. Should’ve walked away and left him to harass himself.
“…They have no powers of arrest but can demand names and addresses to issue fines. Refusal to comply can be a criminal offence…”
Okay, declaring utter subjectivity: this guy revolts me on so many levels…
Having confessed to the above potential prejudice, my theory is that he triple-dips:
1. Get brownie (! woof woof) points from his corrupt bosses
2. Satisfy his personal jihad (eliminating dogs and females over 13 y.o. by stealth)
3. Get the address of people who have death threats from his mob on them – seeing that it is “Tower Hamlets”, the place of residence of Tommy Robinson.
And now you may call me cynical and islamo-phobic. 😉
where Mayor Rahman’s priorities lie…
income, especially from the residents of the clusters of gated enclaves.
I think Theo was determined to teach these lippy kuffar dogs a lesson. I find it insulting that he is in the country let alone a THEO.
There has to be a limit to how far the police state should be allowed to develope. I was walking my dog and two agressive private security officers demanded that I show them that I had doggy poo bags on my person. Nobody likes dog [excrement] on the streets and responsible owners will pick it up. The resources used on the harrasment of law abiding citizens would be better employed paying street cleaners to wash the [excrement] into the gutters.
Soon, it will come to bats. It amazes me that people want to finance an even more oppressive police state. The Nazis and Commies did likewise with their goon squads of rabble in badges, and now Britain is following suit.
After reading the text of the Tower Hamlets website, they are overlooking an important option. They should PAY spies to phone in with reports of miscreants and pay them a Boomer Bounty.
For a recent overview of the European Dog Jihad see this Gatestone Institute report by Soeren Kern, 31 January 2012.
Doubtless like all Muslim males he drew a lousy hand in the poker game of life and thus suffers from testosterone depletion syndrome, a pitiful condition leading to intense frustration, anger at the unfairness of it all and a brutal attitude towards human relationships in general and the hormonally gifted in general.
The psychological consequences of this are an addiction to gender slavery, multiple wives. FGM, honour killing and paedophilia, whereby the rush he/they get from their crude sexual assaults and the impact of their psychological and physical violence towards all and sundry gives their barely viable sperm a better chance of coming to fruition. I am sure that at some subliminal level they think that quantity is a better option than quality, and as usual evolution is proving them wrong.
I would have asked him to state his immigration status. Is he supposed to be in the country, really push it.
I have a fairly simple philosophy when it comes to clowns like this ‘enforcement officer’.
If they are muslim (or African, as many are), and I have had a few encounters, I simply ignore them and walk away. I don’t talk to them, I don’t answer their questions, I don’t even acknowledge their presence.
I was once stopped and questioned by two police officers, one of whom was muslim. I answered the white officer politely and truthfully, but ignored totally the muslim officer. Sure, they got a bit stroppy with me, tried to threaten me for being uncooperative, but in the end they just skulked away.
Be firm, be polite, but above all, absolutely keep control of your temper.
I will not answer to foreign invaders in my own country!
Multiculturalism has become a trojan horse & can & will be used against anyone whose Achilles heel is their pride in their respectful actions & their own tolerance. Such pride is here turned on its head. Genuine tolerance is a two way street. One way tolerance is a dead end, worse, it’s the road to cultural annihilation, disguised as “enrichment”. Beware. This is war.
The elephant in the room is imported & repurposed Islam conquest, in this instance, disguised as the issue of dog faeces. In this instance, from an Islam perspective, there is double indemnity: A woman sans hijab, unaccompanied by a male escort, is out alone walking the dog & a self declared uniformed “authority” dares to try to put the touch on her? Talk about in your face hatred dressed up as policy, funded by those who loath dogs & women.
Think that statement is specious?
The narrow, superstitious hadiths teach hatred of dogs as well as hatred of those who love dogs, as well as hatred in general. A cult is a cult is a cult and in this case puts the cult back in “cult”ural “enrichment”.
What a farce. Enrichment. That is really rich.
Who falls for this kind of taqqiya? In Shi’a Islamic tradition, Taqiyya (التقية) is the dissimulation of one s religious beliefs when one fears for one’s life, the lives of one’s family members, or for the preservation of the faith.
Islam teaches irrational fear & loathing of dogs & orders they all be killed. The woman ought to have used this simple cultural fact to her own advantage by walking away the minute this fake self declared little man syndrome driven pompous git used the pretext of a false example of authority & then failed to produce any evidence for his own claims. Next step? If this happens again, demand a poop DNA test for what in this case he failed to produce.
If you do not challenge this immediately, now, it will rapidly grow far worse & take over all the common shared wealth of outdoor spaces. Use common law to overturn it if necessary but do not let this continue.
That fact of dog hatred is buried in a large game of who in this instance is the actual authority. Is it a resident Brit walking in a resident park paid for by resident taxes? Or is it one more dog loathing usurper of authentic culture, the use of false accusations, sans proof, pan handling & threatening fines & judges & courts, acting officiously under the guise of sickening politically corrected phrases such as “cultural enrichment”?
How is it that so many people are allowing themselves to be so readily preyed upon, taken to the cleaners literally & figuratively, & as good as ousted from everything they value & love, about their own country, as they continue to be “had” by those who hold them in undisguised contempt?
Why did this woman not demand respect? Why di she think she was the one who was not showing any when it was so obvious that it was this costumed idiot who had none? What about one’s own internalized sense of authority as a private person entitled to be left alone & not harassed in public places?
The dog wedge issue is being used strategically, in Britain & elsewhere, as only one of many cultural victimology wedge issues. the larger goal is self evident, one harassment issue after another intended to serve to conquer all the positive aspects of western (or other dog loving) culture, by infiltrating & inculcating warped, hate based values in countless foreign lands, achieved from within.
Let’s go to the heart of this issue, shall we?
Some of the most lovely dog breeds in the world with some of the finest temperaments adapted over centuries to cultivate the greatest natural willingness to be faithful human companions & guide & assistance dogs of every kind were bred in the British Isles.
Enter Islam, which teaches from infancy that to be a real muslim one must loathe, detest (& fear) dogs, women, infidels, pigs, asses, & Jews, not necessarily in that order.
Muhammad’s twisted beliefs regarding dogs were not only irrationally superstitious but extremely cruel. One need only research the extent to which one culture is using fear, hatred, repression, the outlawing of endless benign behaviours, as a means to conquer another culture, like a worm inside an apple, carried out under the guise of incrementalism, the use of aggression masquerading as self declared victimhood, the overturning of enlightenment by means of officious petty bureaucratic policies of riddance, hatred disguised as a demand to “respect” the very same over tolerant multiculturalism which is the target of multi pronged cultural jihad.
Wake up & take back your rights, now or kiss your own culture good bye.
Sharia law is rapidly being superimposed on British culture from within. According to the Koran, muslims who intend to obey Muhammad must kill their dogs. Any rationalization for disobeying the sharia by owning a pet dog is punishable by Allah, meaning other muslims.
Such deeply superstitious life hating beliefs, coupled with brutality, brings out the worst in those who support it
How is that the very opposite of cultural enrichment continues to bafflegab & bamboozle recipients of such tripe while it passes itself off as “cultural enrichment”? Was enrichment every more impoverishing?
How is it that a no one mentions that dogs are loathed throughout the Middle East, except in Israel? How is it that people think that islam is a race when it isn’t? How is it that classic English politeness & reflexive deference to authority is now used to bully the English to kow tow to usurpers of that very authority?
How is it that the funding of strategic block busting is approved by those elected, using intimidation by burka clusters, by urban coup, by block by block infiltration of political mosques to achieve intimidating, by means of no go zones spreading and linking together throughout the heart of British & European cities everywhere? Mosques are already well known as political jihad planning centres. Now witness the sheer mockery of the use of wannabe police to literally hound decent people relentlessly. How has this achieved so many inroads so quickly? And how is it that this degree of non assimilation & infiltration of Britain, which was already a marvellously enriched (British) culture, can be overtaken with such ease by a an impoverished, woman & dog & infidel hating cult?
How has this singular goal been so readily achieved thus far?
This really puts the “slam” in I-slam. Please don’t put up with this abuse of the original culture under any pretext..
Note: Hatred of animals is also considered one the first indicators of individual or collective psychopathology. Be alert to the implications of this.
Muslims believe in obeying only Islamic law – the Sharia, while also often disregarding western laws as false, such as the law disregarded in this video, namely common law, the right of every private man or woman to be left free of exactly what takes place right here. In essence, what we witness here is the takeover of public spaces, using sharia law to intimidate, and hassle and drive people out of all natural locations & make them retreat back inside their homes.
Sharia law, semi covert antithetical law which is the dead opposite of all things sovereign, is actually being implemented & witnessed here.
It states that keeping dogs as pets is not permitted. Period.
The hadith’s statements serve as theological bedrock for Islam’s universal denigration of dogs. Hence Islam scholars detail such rulings in books of their rigid, fundamentalist jurisprudence or theology.
Islam has a formal, established, legal position that dogs are unclean & rejects dogs as pets. Having a dog as a pet is prohibited in Islam. In fact, if a Muslim keeps a dog as a pet Allah will remove from them some heavenly reward for his otherwise good deeds.
“Similarly Allah Taãla created the dog from among His creation. This does not mean that we should love the dog. It is perhaps the indoctrination of the Western culture that ‘The dog is Man’s best Friend’. The theory that ‘dogs are very dependent on Human affection’ is a myth – again culture and custom has helped to develop this unnatural behavior.”
Muslims are instructed to not keep dogs as pets nor ‘love’ them as exemplified by non-Muslims. Remember muslim life is structured & bound at every turn by the Shariah i.e. The Noble Qurãn & the beautiful example of Rasulullah (Sallallaaahu Álayhi Wasallam). Consider these Ahaadith:
“Salaam) said that we, the group of Angels do not enter a house wherein there is a dog or pictures. “(Sahih Muslim Hadith no.3928)
“In the light of these Ahaadith and other narrations it is not permissible to keep dogs as pets. The household is deprived of the Mercy of Allah Taãla.”
“With regard to keeping dogs, this is haraam and is in fact a major sin, because the one who keeps a dog, except those for which an exception has been made, will have two qiraats deducted from his reward every day.
It is by the wisdom of Allaah that like calls to like and evil calls to evil. It is said that the kaafirs, Jews, Christians and communists in the east and the west all keep dogs, Allaah forbid. Each one takes his dog with him and cleans it every day with soap and other cleansing agents. But even if he were to clean it with the water of all the seas in the world and all the soap in the world, it would never become pure! Because its impurity is inherent, and inherent impurity cannot be cleansed except by destroying it and erasing it altogether.”
“But this is by the wisdom of Allaah, and the wisdom of Allaah is that like calls to like and evil calls to Shaytaan (Satan) because this kufr of theirs is by the inspiration of the Shaytaan and the command of the Shaytaan, for the Shaytaan enjoins evil, immorality, kufr and misguidance. So they are slaves to the Shaytaan and to their whims and desires, and they are also evil and love vile things. We ask Allaah to guide us and them.”
Then there are the following statements regarding dogs, which abound in the various collections of traditions (hadith). These traditions are a primary foundation of Islamic theology & are the basis of many Islamic laws. They render dogs as “impure” & worse. Per Muhammad’s orders most dogs were to be killed & all dogs of a specific color (black) had to be killed.
All Hadith below are from the Sahih collections of Bukhari & Muslim, or the Sunan of Abu Dawud. After the Quran, Bukhari’s set of Hadith are regarded to be the second most important books in Islam, followed closely by the Hadith of Muslim.
Dog lovers be aware: Know your enemy.
Bukhari Vol. 4, #540
Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle ordered that the dogs should be killed.
Abu Dawud #2839
Abd Allah B. Mughaffal reported the apostle of Allah as saying: Were dogs not a species of creature I should command that they all be killed; but kill every pure black one.
Muslim #Number 055
Ibn Mughaffal reported: The Messenger of Allah ordered killing of the dogs, and then said: What about them, i. e. about other dogs? and then granted concession (to keep) the dog for hunting and the dog for (the security) of the herd, and said: When the dog licks the utensil, wash it seven times, and rub it with earth the eighth time.
Abu Zubair heard Jabir Abdullah saying: Allah’s messenger ordered us to kill dogs and we carried out this order so much so that we also killed the dog roaming with women from the desert. Then Allah’s apostle forbade their killing. He said: “It is your duty to kill the jet-black (dog) having two spots (on the eyes) for it is a devil.
These Hadith tell the story of Muhammad’s order to kill dogs. Muhammad said he would like to have all dogs killed. He first said he wanted all dogs killed but then made exceptions for dogs that are used for farming, hunting, or watching (outside). Further, he ordered that all black dogs be killed & called them “a Satan”.
Bukhari Vol. 3, #515
Narrated Abu Huraira: “Allah’s Apostle said, “Whoever keeps a dog, one Qirat of the reward of his good deeds is deducted daily, unless the dog is used for guarding a farm or cattle.” Abu Huraira (in another narration) said from the Prophet, “unless it is used for guarding sheep or farms, or for hunting.”
Obviously it’s a dog eat dog world in Islam.
Let’s re-visit Abu Dawud, #2839
Abd Allah B. Mughaffal reported the apostle of Allah as saying: Were dogs not a species of creature I should command that they all be killed; but kill every pure black one.
Abu Dawud Number 0704:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas:
Ikrimah reported on the authority of Ibn Abbas, saying:
I think the Apostle of Allah said: When one of you prays without a sutrah, a dog, an ass, a pig, a Jew, a Magian, and a woman cut off his prayer, but it will suffice if they pass in front of him at a distance of over a stone’s throw.
Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger as saying: Angels do not accompany the travelers who have with them a dog and a bell.
Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger as saying: “The bell is the musical instrument of Satan.”
Reliance of the Traveler which is a compendium of Shafi’i law.
On filth, page 95
e14.0 FILTH (NAJASA)
e.14.1 Filth means:
…(8) dogs and pigs, or their offspring
On purification, page 98
e14.7 Something that becomes impure by contact (def: below) with something from dogs or swine does not become pure except by being washed seven times, one of which (recommended not to be the last) must be with purifying earth (def: e12.1 (b)) mixed with purifying water, and it must read all of the affected area. One may not substitute something else like soap or glasswort in place of earth.
(n: The contact referred to is restricted, in the Shafi’i school, to contamination by traces of moisture from dogs or swing, whether saliva, urine, anything moist from them, or any of their dry parts that have become moist…)
On trade, page 382
k2.2 It is invalid to transact something that is impure in itself (najasa, def: e141) such as a dog or something affected with filth that cannot be purified (O: by washing), like milk or shortening, though if it can be, like a garment, then it may be transacted.
Shorter Encyclopedia of Islam entry on dogs (Kalb).
Kalb, the dog, is also in Islam one of the “unclean beasts” (hence the use of the word kalb as an abusive word, not to be confused with the word for hyena, especially to unbelievers), primarily because its flesh may not be eaten (al-Nawawi ..) and further because, according to the Hadith, there are several special regulation regarding it. For example dogs render food which they lick impure and render unavailable water intended for ritual purifications…) Vessels, likewise, which have been licked by dogs, require to be cleaned several times including once with sand. In a certain way they render impure the whole room in which they are; for angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog and Muhammad had first to sprinkle the place on which a young dog had lain concealed with purificatory water before Djibril would appear to him….)
Dogs “cut off the salat”, i.e. they make the salat worthless when they come into the immediate vicinity of the man at prayer (Ibn Madja, Ikama, bab 30), and one is all the more inclined to attribute this rule to the impurity of the dog as it also holds for menstruating women.
The Arab commentators, however, explain it by saying that the dog frightens the worshipper and distracts him from his devotions (al-Sindi commentary on Ibn Madja as cited above). This is especially true of the black dog, for “he is Satan”). This saying is either to be interpreted literally as meaning that Satan occasionally appears in the form a black dog (cf. Faust) or it only means that black dogs in general are considered particularly dangerous. Dogs in general are considered noxious and should therefore be exterminated (al-Nasa’i, Said wa’l-dhaba’ih, bab 9-14_, but as “Allah does not create anything in which there is not a trace of His wisdom” (al-Sindi, commentary on this passage), this rule is applied only to black dogs.
Bukhari Vol. 1, #490
Narrated ‘Aisha: “The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, “Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman.
1) Prayer is annulled by a dog.
2) Angels do not enter a house wherein there is a dog.
3) Whoever keeps a dog, one Qirat of the reward of his good deeds is deducted daily,
– Pet owners have lower blood pressure
– Pet owners have lower blood cholesterol levels
– Pet owners have a higher survival rate after serious illness
– Pet owners have fewer doctors’ visits
– Pet ownership reduces loneliness
– Pet ownership fights depression
– Pet ownership helps us cope with stress
– Pet ownership aids childhood development
– Pet owners enhance family life
Can we safely conclude that muslim non pet owner:
– have higher blood pressure
– have higher blood cholesterol levels
– have a lower survival rate after serious illness
-have more doctors’ visits
– have increased loneliness
– have greater depression
– have less ways to cope with stress
– have less ways to aid childhood development
– have an non enhanced family life?
Interesting question for you, Mia…
…is it possible that there was a time in the 7th Century when a certain unnamed paedophile could find neither girl children nor slaves nor goats in order to slake his lust and the substitute he tried it on with, a substitute with a maxillary dental formula
3(incisors)2(canines)4(premolars)2(molars) and a mandibular of 3(incisors)2(canines)4(premolars)3(molars), simply turned around and bit him?
Now, that might explain a lot, I’m thinking.
Seneca, you’re naughty. You’re trying to tell us that goats don’t bite.
Maybe. Can’t rule it out. Anything is possible, since all bets were off and everything was and still is fair game for this predator based “cult-ture”.
Though there may have been some rabies justification, even rabies does not explain this phobia, especially since the teachings lump dogs in with other despised groups seen as beasts of burden or to be killed, or both, such as women.
ASk a muslim about dogs they will try to convince you the hadiths are talking about hyenas. Not. This is a culture of easily threatened men who are so insecure & so misogynistic that women are routinely disfigured in ways which renders them worse off by far even than eunuchs pr the phantom of the opera, or both, then seem to be kept around to do most chores as well as for breeding purposes. However, don’t underestimate this use of women to gain the population advantage. Most muslim cultures have a distinct advantage, with over half the population at their disposal as geneder slaves, unlike non muslims which non forcibly reproduce at around 1.8, non sustainable. Education leads to much lower rates of reproduction, which explains why Muslims reproduce at the opposite rate of at 8.1.
They have a ceremony where the new infant is revered as a future suicide bomber. The policy a las Jim Jones and similar death cults is the ultimate cowardice, & appears to be to use all surplus as human shields, jihad terrorists, (Google Camp Jihad for how terror training is carried out in Gaza, funded by the US/UN). Still, there is a distinct edge, domination by virtue of animal husbandry applied to females a breed slaves. However, even though on the face of it, it’s illegal for adults, fact is that unofficially dancing boys & even infants are seen as commodities for pleasure. So telling, pretty much says it all. Theocratic control freakery has so many poker tells. Any good player should always use this inherent weakness, their fear of loss of control, and put it to their own advantage. Re-watch Show me the Poop and then part 2 & 3. Read the drop down explanation from the poster. Focus solely the behaviour of this short, would be power monger wannabe policeman. It is impossible to take this kind of backward twerp seriously, that is, unless you happen to be in thrall to some larger sense of externalized fictitious authority which you think only exists outside yourself. If so, you have way bigger problems than dog poop.
Read the relevant parts of agenda 21, it closely echoes the basic tenets of the Qu’ran. The UN honchos & Islamic leaders are not by accident temporary allies. In many ways the UN and Islam behave much like siamese twins. They share a duplicitous, dystopian, cult-like, totalitarian agenda, based on barely disguised contempt for life itself. Each has its own a vicious, hate filled police force, the actions of which are based on a foundation of cruelty, abuse, exploitation of the most vulnerable. Each postures & struts its authoritarian cake walk, as if engaged in high minded virtue. Each covertly pursues child sex objects & sex slave brothels, which, even when carefully intertwined, invariably get leaked to a largely indifferent & self absorbed public which refuses to realize that this agenda is intended to surround and overrule them, at least not until it may be too late. Sharia law and UN law are similar. Each is bully boy based. At base each allows pond scum to rise to the surface, while colluding in a joint fantasy pursued with vengeance. Funny thing is each cult wants what amounts to one mutually exclusive goal, that of fascistic world domination. Each operates on a similar premise of authoritarian governance. Each uses propaganda which blurs multicultural lines of decency, undermines every person’s right to sovereign lives, private property & common law rights. Each thrives on lies whilst assuming a pretence that they are best qualified by entitlement to oversee global ascendancy and domination for which both groups are the most ill suited. T’was ever thus.
Great point about hostility to animals as an early warning about psychos. A whole region and religion? Psychotic.
Can it really be implied that muslim women are self-harming victims of islam, doubt islam can be argued down on a politically sensitive animal liberation or misandry agenda.
Some moderately good news, Mia: In Israel, Judea and Samaria, the fertility rate among Jewish women is a little higher than among “Palestinians”. Doesn’t address the problem elsewhere, I know.
Dear western infidels, i hate to bring you more bad tidings regarding the wonderful religion of peace and the havoc that it is bringing to other infidels on the other side of the world. While you western infidels worry about an overzealous mohammadian faux-officer harrasing a native british infidel lady about dog poo in the park near a muslim mini-caliphate ( tower hamlets) there are already townships in malaysia where an infidel has to obtain an Izin ( permission slip for a fee) from the town council attesting that his/her muslim neighbours consent to him/her keeping a dog as a pet ! ( how about that eh western kuffaars, how about that, and all youfolks have to worry about is dog poo LOL)
Not only are infidels subservient to the whims and dog-phobia of mohammdians, they also now want buddhists ,hindus and sikhs to build their places of worship according to islamic architecture, ie they want buddhist to build their temple to look like a mosque in some states in malaysia….and of course we still have on going fire bombing ( latest was in Penang island where the oldest catholic church of the assumption was fire bomb by peaceful infidel loving muslims as instructed by their kind and compassionate koran )….all this because the christians dare used the word allah in their malay publication. You see muslims are very jealous of their God LOL…their God is so weak that they have to protect him ( male of course) at all cost. See even their sanctum sanctuarium is earth based and has a speciic coordinate and is housed in a cube /kaaba ..so everything about this religion is about territorial imperative. EVen the malaysian astronaut had to learn to do salaat from outer space and it took a whole cadre of islamic imams to figure out how to kowtow to an earthbound abode of allah from low earth orbit ( it is just so comical ha ha ha ). By the way they also fire bombed the sikhs gurudwara and of course the muslims have been burning and demolishing the hindu’s and buddhist’s temple on and of for the last ten years …and recently when some rather culturally advanced muslim malays decided to visit a christian church just out of goodwill , the more insecure ones organized a million muslim protest against christian evangelism in a local football stadium ( i think only a few thousands show up…thank god /Jove ( ahem) for the fair minded malays who are probably too educated to fall for that kind of stupidity ….thank allah that there are still many malay muslims who still have their common sense and humanity and fair play to fall for this kind of dangerous religiously based baiting and tactics of divisivness in a multifaith multi ethnic country such as malaysia and singapore. Unfotunately the saudis and the salafist type regimes with their oil money are making an impact on the islam practised in south east asia and is quckly giving rise to intolerance and shariah enforcement in that area of the world. Everyone is horrified now that Brunei has decided to adopt shariah as the supreme law of the land …thank you Shell oil conglomerate for creating a welfare state and making the potentate one of the richest man on earth and now he is inviting in this horrific barbaric 6th century desert code that pretends to be divine ! what with wife beating , female stoning and amputation of hands and legs…what a wonderful future for tiny brunei in an era of space travel…and what if an alien tourist had 2 heads and 6 arms and accidentally stole a loaf of Roti ? Oy veh, maybe the closet islamist Dr. Tariq Ramadan may have a sane solution to this shariah infracting alien entity…after all he is pushing for a european Islamism isn’t he …whatever that maybe….i guess it is something from alice’s wonderland..a shariah leopard without its spots …!
Oh and of course there is the case of Acheh province ( and soon to spread around to other places) in indonesia, they are opting for women stoning, beheading of apostates and of course the obligatory chopping of hands and legs since shariah is now de rigeur and man and women must be segregated..no holding of hands …and incidentally shariah is not just for muslims it is all encompassing and it is imposed on non muslims too , so that hindus, christians, buddhists , taoist /confucianist and other inhabitants of achech province will have to have their daughters wear the tudong/hijab when they venture outside or go to public school …..and forget about dogs , not to mention their poo. Many non muslims would probably opt to forego the hassle and throw their pet pooch out the door for it to fend for itself and here is where the muslim animal death squad comes in and ooh i dont want to spoil your dinner, you can go figure for yourself what they will do to poor doggy. Cats fare a little bit better . Salaam alaykum y’all …and yes please tell the oil shell conglomerate and all the infidel corporation and infidel governments of the world it is all their fault, they are the ones that empower and donate and contribute and train and sustain this evil ROP…..every kafir in the west who has portfolio /investment in some instruments that are shariah compliant are complicit in the advancement of mohammadianism in one way or another….what a dastardly web we weave….. Oy weh Himmel auf der Erde , may allah be nice to us for we are but mere ignorant kuffaars !
Pingback: Dog Jihad in Blackburn | Gates of Vienna