Buddhist monks have been leading the resistance to Islamization in western Burma, and there has been a series of clashes there between the supporters of the 969 movement and Rohingya Muslims. Below is a BBC news report on the events of the past few months.
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading this video:
typical dhimmi BBC….you forget 969 was response to same kind of numbered attitude and worse by islamists.
Mohammedans, if attacked by burmese natives, don’t expect help from neither police nor military, in a non-mohammedan country like Burma? That’s the difference between Burma and the West: In the West, the natives if attacked by mohammedan intruders cannot expect help from neither police nor military. Which situation is preferable, if you’ve really got to have mohammedan intruders in your country?!
Buddists are doing it the right way. Address the Muslim problem right away. As the monk says, a single Muslim will generally behave himself. When several other muzzies join him, trouble begins stirring. This is the modus operandi we see time and again.
The BBC might as well have been a muzzie himself given the way he stacked things.
Ahhh, poor muslims, [epithets]. See how the rest of the world lives when you invade a country and cause all kinds of grief. Maybe the rest of the world will learn a thing or two from these courageous monks.
“If the conflict began because of my teaching, then our side would have started it. But that was not what happened. They attacked us, and our side responded in anger.”
This is the law of the harvest. They have sown hatred and violence, and now they reap the harvest thereof.
So the Buddhists are getting a bad rap for doing what the muslims do to minorities in their countries. The BBC never speaks of the atrocities the muslims commit to minorities in their countries but skewer the Buddhists! The Buddhists are smart!
It seemed to me the monks had a distinct East Asian look, whereas the brief glimpses of the muslims showed a more Indian appearance. I know the creed was supposedly spread by Arab traders through the Indian Ocean in the 8th c., but would they really retain the distinct look 13 centuries later?
Actually, Bangladesh and Burma are both full of people who combine the features of South and East Asia.
Surprise.
The world is NOT composed entirely of the cowardly, post-Christian, self-hating fools we have in charge here in the “West”.
Turn-about, after all, IS fair play.
Now iffen they only had our 2nd ammendment…………….
The Asian countries muslims populate today were once Buddhist. (Sound familiar?) Buddhists are well aware that these anal retentive madmen celebrated the
destruction of their temples and sacred
texts. (Real insight and
tolerance for all mankind.) No doubt muslim have similar dreams for a target rich
civilised world. As Buddhists are now do we may be. (So I imagine based on “feedback” from the muslim on any western street. The Buddhist back is to the wall.
No mention in the article of Islam’s relentless terror next door in Thailand. They don’t need to imagine dangers, they can see it everyday in the newspaper.
I can only give two cheers to the Burmese Buddhists. Under my real name, I am a former US diplomat with experience in Southeast Asian refugee and migration affairs. Before the Buddhists of Myanmar discovered the Rohingya as an enemy, they were going after the Christian Chin, Kachin, and Karen peoples. Come to think of it, they weren’t very nice to their Shan and Mon co-religionists, either.
From Thai Theravada Buddhists, I’ve heard things about Chinese Mahayanists which are probably comparable to what “Prods” and “Teagues” said about each other in Northern Ireland (for the record, my religion is the Christian Reformed one); albeit I will readily grant that Thailand is generally decent to its religious minorities.
What the Buddhist’s in Burma are doing with their muslim nemesis, is the same thing that is going to happen here in the west, all it is going to take is for the proverbial shot to be heard around the world to kick it all off.