No Turning Point

Our Spanish correspondent Hermes returns with an essay on the foreclosure by the Western power elites of any alternative to the disastrous collapse of the ideological and political Multicultural regime that they have worked so long to build.

No Turning Point
by Hermes

Europe is changing. Much of what once was, will never be again. Events that fifteen years ago people would have considered unthinkable are becoming an everyday reality in the streets of Paris, London or Stockholm. And things that now — in spite of what is currently unfolding — seem unthinkable, are likely to become reality, no matter how painful or dreadful those may still seem.

Men are hardly capable of foreseeing the future, perhaps not out of ignorance or lack of knowledge of what is in happening in that given space and at that given time, but out of ideological and subjective considerations regarding their own selves and events taking place in that given space and time.

In the words of Enoch Powell, who may have been one of the few in history who, when needed, had the level of ideological detachment and objective vision of history-to-come needed to prevent future social collapses and chaos:

The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature.

One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.

So following the chain of events that has recently taken place, the Prime Ministers of England and Sweden were by definition charged by their respective people with the function of providing against such preventable horrors as the decapitation of a British soldier in broad daylight in a street of London, or such preventable actions as the massive destruction of public and private property in Stockholm.

But how is it even possible that these events still took place? How were these awful events, which may be perfectly seen as dreadful omens for the future, possible at all?

In looking for the underlying reasons for the seemingly irresponsible and short-sighted behavior by part of politicians, one may be compelled to take into account those elements in human behavior which predetermine the deeds of statesmen. Desire for power and the will to keep it are most likely to be the personal goals, and because of this, the top elements influencing the psyche of these kinds of people. The ruling political and ideological current is also worth taking into consideration, since this has influence on the broader acceptance of a leader in society. This means that for a leader to be acknowledged and accepted by a majority of people, this leader must not only follow, but be the embodiment of the mainstream ideological current present among the population. And by willingly taking on and professing that given ideological current, the leader and those standing around automatically lose the sight of one of their eyes, metaphorically speaking. Or better said, they willingly renounce it.

And we unavoidably arrive at the issue of political correctness and the illogical left-liberal notion of racism which pervades the entire Western society. The MSM are always busy labelling such things as bacon being sent to an Imam or chopped swine heads being thrown at the door of mosques as “racist attack” against that religion called Islam. But such appalling and treacherous acts as cooking a Christ are never deemed as a racist attack against the religion called Christianity. So interestingly enough, burning a Quran is declared to be a crime against humanity and a sign of the resurgence of “fascism”, but roasting Jesus or publicly burning a crucifix hardly attracts any attention by any part of the MSM.

Racism exists. Discriminating against people on grounds of their skin color or race is racism indeed, regardless whether the person who is the subject of discrimination is black, white or of another color. But (as left-liberals express themselves) “attacking” Islam is not “racism”, for if it were, then attacking Christianity should also be called “racism”. For it is a religion, too.

So following the left-liberal “logic” regarding this word, Islam must automatically be deemed the most racist ideology on the face of the earth, since Islam has been fighting and destroying all religions and cultures for over 1400 years. It is precisely the left-liberals who with their liberal and arbitrary usage of the word “racist” turn Islam into the embodiment of racism.

According to Aje Carlbom, a Swedish academic and author of a critical study on Swedish immigration policy, “Anyone who wants to regulate immigration is immediately classified as a nationalist, which also implies a racist as well.” He says, “It is still almost impossible to debate this question.”

It is almost impossible to debate this question because debating it would also mean debating a way of thinking which has been leading the way for the entire West since the end of WW2. For what happened during the darkest years of European history had left an effect so profound in the collective mind of the West that it has affected it beyond rationality and basic common sense, shaking and overturning the most basic tenets of the European identity and Western Civilization. The diabolical tenets of the ideology which arose during that period did not cease to poison Western Civilization with the end of WW2. Those principles mutated into a new, seemingly antithetical (“antiracism”) ideological monster which has been since then steadily destroying Western Civilization. And this monster has been successfully used by the left-liberal elites in order to grab the power and sweep away any trace of counterweight to the almighty ruling power. That is, any trace of free speech and democracy.

It is true that “The days when these ruling elites could claim that they ‘didn’t know’ the effects of their policies are now long gone”, but the point here is that they do not want to acknowledge that the effects of their policies are evil and lead to the irreversible destruction of Western Culture and Civilization. Neither want to nor can, because this would mean the very end of what they have been striving for decades. This would mean the willingly acceptance by part of them of the downfall of the ideology which has been for decades dictating what is right and what is wrong for Westerners. An entire transnational ideological empire is grounded on this ideology and way of seeing the world. And the ruling elites will not voluntarily acknowledge that what they have been preaching, professing and enforcing on the Western peoples is nothing but a utopian fantasy lacking every trace of sanity, yet earth-shattering events will usher in the end of this ideological leviathan. For this cannot be stopped now in a rational and civilized way. The inertial energy of it is now far too powerful, and the elites are irrevocably trapped in their own ideological grip. It is like a little snowball which was set in motion decades ago. And the tiny and harmless snowball has now turned into what one may by now expect. And no one (except for those like Enoch Powell) dared nor bothered worrying about what it might turn into.

This is likely to be the reason why Mr. Cameron said that the deadly attack on serviceman Lee Rigby was a “Betrayal of Islam”. He cared more about Islam itself, that is, in a broader sense about safekeeping the ruling transnational ideological empire upon which the power of the ruling left-liberal elites is grounded, and also assuring the future voter base which will eventually grant them another term in power, than about the brutal murder of an unarmed member of the British army. This could rightly be understood as high treason against the British armed forces.

In the words of Paul Weston:

Left-liberals have committed treason and continue to commit treason on an ongoing basis. They are not held to account because the government and the police are also committing treason, and the head of the government is David Cameron, a man who describes himself as a Conservative but who is, in reality, just another left-liberal traitor.

Kjell Lindgren, the spokesman for Stockholm Police declared that: “We don’t know why they are doing this, there is no answer to it”. These people are incapable of finding an answer to this because the situation itself does not fit with their notions of “openness” and “tolerance”, those notions which have been inoculated into Western populations from the very beginning. They “naïvely” (let’s express ourselves as mildly as possible) extrapolate themselves into the other cultures they allow in, taking for granted that immigrants will give up their own ways of seeing the world and resolving conflicts, and willingly adopt the ways of behaving of the host culture. Besides, westerners have been taught that “all cultures are equal”, so by definition, all members of all cultures are likely to behave the same way.

How fatal an indoctrination…

People who profess Multiculturalism, “antiracism” and the idea that more immigrants are needed cannot exclude a certain religion or culture out of the whole mass, because this would cast serious doubts on Multiculturalism itself, thus giving rise to a precedent case of the exclusion of a given culture or religion, and also because this would take away from them the unbeatable advantage they have over their political opponents, whom they can only shun and sweep away by calling them what they usually do — racist, fascist, etc…

Thus, the British PM’s reaction was a fairly predictable and “logical” one. By trying to whitewash Islam, he and others are also trying desperately to safeguard their positions and ideological guidelines. They are well aware of the effects of their policies, but they will never ever acknowledge that truth of the inherent danger posed by Islam. They will never acknowledge that a given culture from the unholy multicultural melting pot is provably lethal to any other society or culture. Those people will never ever acknowledge the truth which is admitted even by ex-Muslims themselves. Perhaps they are even well aware that people have knowledge of their lies, but this fact does not matter to them. Neither were communist leaders bothered that people knew the truth, although they were well aware that many many people were secretly listening to the Radio Free Europe. They were well aware of this because they were busy intercepting the radio transmissions and running expensive technical facilities with the aim of distorting the broadcasts of the radio as much as possible, especially when political magazines were aired.

But the most notable about the multicultural policies of the ruling left-liberal elites which are being successfully exploited by Islam in order to infiltrate the West is that both David Cameron and Fredrik Reinfeldt need to pursue them if they want to survive politically. They simply cannot avoid the factor of immigration and the potential weight it may have in future presidential elections. Sweden alone in 2006 accepted almost as many asylum applications from Iraqis as all other European countries did combined. Native Swedes, who live in a country which was one of the most ethnically homogeneous nations in the world only thirty years ago, may well turn into a minority in their own country within a few decades, so that it shall be the immigrant vote which will truly count. And it was thanks to the Muslim votes that François Hollande won the French presidential election a year ago.

So no politician belonging to the elites seems to care much about a French soldier being stabbed in the neck, public and private property being massively destroyed, or a British one being beheaded in broad daylight in a street in London, so long as they can keep the power for themselves. And the only way for them to achieve this will be increasingly to rely on the votes of the ever-growing immigrant population. We have reached a stage in which people simply do not count, no matter who they are, or where they come from. The elites do not care about people in general, let alone the native population to which they belong. They do not care about truths and lies as long as they can keep the power in their hands, if not by deception or persuasion, then by force. This is the only issue which matters to them.

Of Britain it was written in 2008 that:

My bet is still on Britain, or possibly Denmark, as the first Western country to face a civil war due to mass immigration, but the Netherlands is a potential candidate as well. I just wonder whether the Dutch are already a broken nation.

Every single day we get more evidence that the authorities are totally incapable of protecting any semblance of security and freedom for its citizens. The only thing the state still seems to be capable of doing is indoctrinating our children with hatred of their own civilization and taking away our money so that it can be given to those who colonize our countries and abuse our children, verbally and physically.

And on Sweden, also in 2008, that:

Sweden has been known as a “model country” with an economic system as a third way between capitalism and Socialism, or enlightened Socialism as it has been called. In 2008, the “Swedish model” no longer refers to an economic success story (and the Swedish economy grew rapidly before the welfare state was established), but to a horror story of cultural suicide, Gramscian cultural Marxism, ideological censorship and repression of dissent. Sweden is not unique. Similar trends are evident all over the Western world. But Political Correctness is unusual in its severity here, in part because Sweden already viewed itself as an “ideological state,” and the country is definitely ahead of the curve in ideological repression.

As for Britain, a few days ago a former MI6 chief openly admitted that the security forces are virtually powerless to stop atrocities like the Woolwich murder:

“I think it is incredibly hard to stop,” he said. “When does a person who expresses radical views, who joins a radical group, flip over to be a violent extremist? To find the signals, the red flags as it were, I think is enormously hard.”

As for Sweden, there is the declaration of Aje Carlbom, also made a few days ago, that:

“Anyone who wants to regulate immigration is immediately classified as a nationalist, which also implies a racist as well,” he said. “It is still almost impossible to debate this question.”

All predictions made by those who have been warning about the dangers threatening Europe are coming true. And this means that those predictions which have not yet been fulfilled are likely to come true, too. All those endowed with the capacity to foresee the long-term consequences of decisions being taken at a given time such as Enoch Powell, Lars Hedegaard, Fjordman, Udo Ulfkotte, Michael Stürzenberger and many others have been warning the West about what may happen if the actual left-liberal policies are pursued further on with no questioning nor criticism. In the words of a well-known blogger:

“The massive concentration of Muslims in major European cities will have dramatic consequences, some of which are already visible. If it is allowed to continue, it will destroy the coherence of society that is necessary for our legal systems to work. Increased urban insecurity means that the state is not able to guarantee the security of its citizens. If ordinary citizens feel that the state is no longer able to guarantee the safety of their loved ones, then perhaps native Europeans will create groups and clans of their own, to counter the Muslim clans. The result will be a re-tribalization of our countries. The downfall of the nation state, if it happens, will be chaotic, painful and bloody. Can it still be avoided? Only time will tell.” — Defeating Eurabia, 2008 – p.116

Time is increasingly proving that this scenario is less and less avoidable, and the Woolwich attack was the clearest of signals for this. The elites cannot avoid their own downfall, but it will be the consequences of their own deeds which will bring them down together with their ideology. Nor can great social unrest and clashes be avoided. The time of avoidance is now over. Warnings have been made, but as Enoch Powell stated: “such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred.” This impossibility of demonstrating what may happen until it has already occurred was exploited by the left-liberal elites in order to sweep away any kind of counterbalance or criticism, even if it might have been truly constructive and worth hearing, and continue with their blind pursuit of power.

And we may soon see the dreadful outcome of this.

Previous essays by Hermes:

2013   Jan   11   Strange Days
    Feb   13   Nuances

27 thoughts on “No Turning Point

    • EDL has been doing that for 4 years. At the start even the BBC was reporting that EDL demonstrations had black and white people on them.

      The media soon “closed ranks” and, despite all evidence to the contrary, attempted to marginalise the cause of EDL by reporting that EDL were racists and nazis.

      3 years ago the fascist Left could out-number EDL at some demonstrations. Now the fascist Left are only 1/10th or 1/50th of the numbers EDL gets (and it’s not that EDL has grown massively in the intervening years).

      You can add 50% to 100% to the “official” numbers that Wikipedia reports for the EDL at the above link.

      One way you disrupt them ideologically is you insist they are the fascist Left. You do not let them claim they are “anti-fascists”, when they are largely pro-Stalinist communists who are if anything worse than Mussolini’s fascists.

      The fascist Left use “anti-fascism” as a fig-leaf. The UAF in Britain are now financially dependent on islamo-fascist organisations. The UAF invite pro-terrorism muslims to be on their board of directors; they have muslims who follow avowedly fascist organisations to speak at their conferences.

      What you have no control over is the media and the political parties who are determined to stop the populous from objecting to islamisation. It is clear that the cowardice of the middle class has put Europe on a direct course for civil war. The middle class are starting to wake up and realise this.

      No sooner does one of them mention it (as in the above two articles), than the comments are closed and a (totally groundless) “refutation” is issued. Thus ensuring that the route to civil war is maintained.

  1. I have a photograph taken in about 1958 of myself and my parents in a group on holiday in Norfolk, England. The sun is shining and I find myself increasingly drawn to the photograph. For it seems almost to radiate the essence of another country in another time. It was a happy, homogeneous, cohesive nation, where patriotism was valued. It was 99.9% indigenous white English and my primary school in a northern mill town was 100% indigenous white English.

    Now, just over 50 years later, England is probably only about 70% indigenous white English and my primary school is 90% Pakistani muslim. But there is another point, England was a free country and people used to say if asked a favour, “Go ahead, it’s a free country”. I am not alone in remarking that nobody says that any more; this must be because nobody accepts that it is true any more. Final proof today is the news given out by the BBC that Geert Wilders is barred from entering Britain. This came in connection with the item on Mr Obama’s ensuring that Edward Snowden is holed up in Hong Kong awaiting extradition with no country, especially police state Britain, being able to grant him sanctuary.

    Could somebody please name any other country from which Mr Wilders is barred?
    I suspect Norway and Sweden might be two. Luckily America still has the first amendment, just and free speech is still permitted there. It is no longer allowed in Britain. I suspect that this is the work of Nick Clegg’s Liberal Democrats who believe in liberalism but not freedom. Or it could be that the government, as Tommy Robinson said, are terrified of the muslim terrorists in our midst or of the mini-civil war which the judge predicted could have taken place if the islamists had brought murder and injury to the EDL demonstation in Dewsbury. Looking at that photo brings me some solace for it reminds me that the world was not always so dark and awful. To paraphrase the Danish national anthemn, there was a lovely land, called England, now on its deathbed thanks to the postwar insanity of the political elites who want whites and their civilisation to be as defunct as that of Atlantis.

    • I could have added that I have simply lost the plot. I search my brain but I cannot understand what good any of this has done England at all. It has greatly benefited the third world who will still have countries of their own when we have been totally divested of ours, It has been of not benefit either economically or socially. It is simple genocide. There has never ever been any consent to it. There is a man who comments on the online version of the Daily Telegraph and calls himself rare cockney, simply because, whereas 60 years ago London was the cockneys’ own. They are probably now only about a third of its population. This is ethnic cleansing on a massive scale. Then there is the chap who just writes, “I want my country back”. The large percentage of England’s ethnic population do but they are being denied it, why? Who is doing this to us and what purpose will it serve anybody bar the third worlders whose countries will still be there when we have been resigned to oblivion and will still be just as much part of the third world as they were 60 years ago when mass immigration began. No change there then.

      • You Know who might be making gobs of cash?

        The people sitting in Parliament who are there auditioning for
        Lobbyist jobs and quango jobs. You know who they are, as they are hiding in plain sight!

      • You Know who might be making gobs of cash?

        The people sitting in Parliament who are there auditioning for
        Lobbyist jobs and quango jobs. You know who they are, as they are hiding in plain sight!

  2. Look at these:

    Six “teens” charged for Stockholm gang rape

    The punishment was lower than usual as the boys are under minors (under 18), and the court also concluded that they had already been punished in sorts by having their pictures and their personal details exposed on the internet.

    …Admin, you should get their pictures and upload here… you know.

  3. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Western man is slow to anger – but surely I’m not alone in feeling that the worm is beginning to turn. Someone mentioned Enoch Powell in this thread; he saw consequences where others saw nothing. But don’t you think others are catching him up? Of course, to those of us ‘already in the know’ the pace of change is painfully slow – but isn’t that always the case? Don’t forget, in terms of a man’s life 50 years is a long time, but in terms of history it is a mere heartbeat. I was in the pub the other night, as I often am, and there, on the bar by its owner’s elbow, quite unashamedly, was Danny Lockwood’s book ‘The Islamic Republic of Dewsbury”. That couldn’t have happened not that long ago. And I’m beginning to overhear snippets of conversation that would have been unthinkable just 18 months ago. People are waking up.

    • Go to any city in Europe and you can hear the natives getting more restless and more angry by the day. All that it is going to take to kick the whole thing off is but one incident and then the dogs of war will be unleashed, neighborhood by neighborhood and city by city and area by are and then finally region by region. It will spread like wildfire and the armies of Europe will finally be forced to side with their own.

  4. Catastrophe is coming, certainly.

    Guillaume Faye has been writing on this for the past 15 years or so.

  5. Please everybody, stop calling this situation a “civil war”. This is a colonizing force, an enemy beachhead, an anti-civilizational wedge that’s being hammered into our countries. These invaders are not “civilians”, they are not here to share in our civic society, but to impose and dictate by violence.

    On our part, we should only call it “house cleaning”. On their part is called conquest.

    • On the macro level yes, it will be a war for survival against an invading foe. However before, and for it to get to that, that there will a civil war of sorts when the people depose the likes of Cameron, Clegg, Johnson and all the other quislings, or say a military coup in the USA to toss out the Obama style of ruling clique and the top brass who have sold out the nation. One has to rather unfortunately hope that this will happen sooner rather than later, in other words before the current policies have completely destroyed the nation and with it its ability to protect its people from external invasion/

      • It is going to be a long hot summer in the U.K. without the rose-tinted spectacles, will this be the autochthones sociopolitical coming of age.

        • According to Russia Today the Met have been stocking up with water cannon for further 2011 riots. It will only take an excess of sus or for some exotic drug dealer to be shot and it could all take off again. I wonder what the people watching the coronation in 1953 will do if this combines with a successful islamic terrorist attack from which our security services tell us it is now impossible for us to be immune.

          Michael Wood at the beginning of his series of history programmes on Britain spoke of modern Britain being a nation of tribes, a nation of nations. That sounds more like the foyer of the United Nations which is what we seem to have been forced to become. Burke spoke of a nation as being of a people of common blood, history and culture. We are now none of these. But then the ultimate aim of the one worlders, whoever they really are, is to demolish the nation state and create a borderless world where people wander around like grazing cattle on the prairies.

          Today we hear that the EU and the US are engaged in talks about free trade. I am convinced that this is the first step towards political union. Obama has been talking to the Chinese about the same thing and Cameron to the Indians. All steps towards the one world totalitarian – for it will have to be to control it – state. The thought is horrendous, we will belong nowhere and live in a world-wide prison, living cheek by jowl with people we have nothing in common with and do not want to live with.

          The Times has discovered that Princess Diana had a drop of Indian blood and so thus has Prince William. It was the front page story, why?, because Mr Cameron and the New World Order wanted it to be so as to firm up the India – EU (via Britain) linkage.


  6. I have noticed how the larger towns and cities in the UK have been subtly, though effectively transformed over the past decade and a half into what seem like foreign enclaves. A trip into the city centre of Glasgow was always a treat as a child, what with the hustle and the bustle, that still remains, though the Scottish/ British vibe and nature of Glasgow’s central business district has left. There is much wilful ignorance up here due to the continued support of New Labour & the Scottish National party, both of whom advocate this cultural, racial and ideological transformation.

    A visit to London is for someone who lived in and knew the London of pre 1997 a journey into the epicentre of the social engineering project that I for one would say was done to destroy a once great nation & people, I am still astounded that we accept all this, and have had difficulty coming to terms with this situation.

    • We accept it because we are all too terrified to say anything. I dreamt last night that I was being pursued by the security forces; it might yet happen. However, on a recent equality and diversity course I did notice an undertow of resentment which would have been kept under wraps before now. Some say Enoch Powell said too much too soon, that is why he was dismissed as alarmist, although some of us could well follow his line of argument.

      I am still intrigued by Theresa May’s recent statement that the government is expecting an Anders Breivik style attack in Britain. Are they actually going to provoke one in order to further villify the indigenous – sorry no such thing according to Tony Blair and that expert on British dna the African American Bonnie Greer – populace? Or are they going to provoke one in the hope that the silent majority finally say enough is enough (although the Norwegians never dared do so, just meekly followed the government’s pro-multicutural line).

      By the way, although I do not remember London in the 1950s, I do remember it in the late sixties. To see what it was like you just have to watch those black and white re-runs of Top of the Pops from that time, no sign of non-ethnic Englishness. It is all like Gone with the Wind now, something remembered in a dream. Glad to see Scotland is waking up. I have a Scottish friend living abroad who used to ridicule me in the 1980s when I first began to get alarmed at what was happening to England.

      • Scottish National Party, practice hollow-nationalism fused with the multikulti internationalism of the left – No Place For Scottishness in this independent Scotland.

        Post referendum whatever happens the indigenous Scots have to vacate their dystopian foxhole and face-up to a few home truths.

        • Sometimes I feel many like me in Scotland are alone & isolated
          We are vilified by the Liberals and the Socialists that are in abundance up here, the Scottish Nationalists are every bit as bad when you speak facts and truth to their faces, many in England see us all as anti English, there are many up in Scotland who love being part of the United Kingdom.

          I try and explain to Scots that becoming independent and joining the E.U will be a disaster for Scotland, we will be shackled by Brussels and the UN one world agenda.

          With the same hand I try to explain to English that most Scots have nothing against England, talk about stuck between a rock and a hard place. And if that is not bad enough the Burquas abound in Glasgow and with a small demographic on a par with Denmark, all traces of Scottish/North British culture will be bred out by mass immigration in a short time.

  7. Once again I repeat my question. Does anybody know of any country in Europe from which Geert Wilders is barred apart from this blessed plot called England? I expect Shakespeare is revolving in his grave as well; and why isn’t Drake’s drum sounding unaided; it did at the time of the Battle of Britain.

    • Wilders is not barred from entering the UK. He was barred by our disgusting, spineless political elite in Westminster, but he took the ban to court and visited Parliament in March 2010, to show his film Fitna.

  8. Pingback: No Turning Point | ACT! for Canada

  9. “In jeopardy: Future of white South Africans
    Genocide Watch expert warns population on verge of extermination”

    Western nations’ leaders are not ignorant of the cruel and extremely barbaric mass murders of entire white families in South Africa by blacks. The barbarism has been going on for MANY years.

    America, Canada, Europe, Britain, Australia and New Zealand have an absolute moral obligation to take the severely persecuted whites into their countries.

    Instead, ruthless Western leaders colonized their countries with many
    millions of Muslims and blacks – people who are NOT suffering, NOT
    living in daily fear, NOT enduring barbarism.

    God will surely judge ruthless Western leaders for their great cruelty in importing many millions of Muslims instead of taking in desperate white South Africans.

    The white South Africans would have made outstanding
    citizens completely loyal to their new adopted countries. Muslims openly declare their goal is Islamic conquest of our countries and the
    imposition of barbaric sharia law.

    BARENAKEDISLAM: 78% of Muslims in UK think anyone who insults Islam should be punished to the fullest extent of the law……Sharia ‘Islamic’ Law!

  10. If the leftistliberal elite holds all whites responsible for all the world’s ills, especially in Africa then why should they rush to save South Africans whites. Once all whites find themselves in minorities they will probably not rush to save them either. This is probably all a part of the plan. The question is whether the liberal lefties will wear a big sign round their necks saying they are liberal lefties and hate their fellow whites in the hope of being saved. Don’t think it will work but they have not thought that far ahead.

    • When push comes to shove and make no mistake it will, the European DNA strain of you get to keep what you conquer will be brought to bare in spades. There will be no Queensbury rules, no quarter and forget about the so called Geneva Conventions, all that is going to go out the window and we will come full circle of what Europeans do best, wage unlimited and unrestricted warfare.

      • I am beginning to believe that part of the one world plan was to make European countries colonies of their former colonies in a sort of reverse imperialism. This would ensure that the links, severed at the time of independence, would be reforged. Hence France is behind Eurabia, effectively, North African muslim colonisation, Holland is the link to the East Indies via Indonesian colonisation and Britain is rapidly becoming a colony of the Indian Sub-continent similar to Fiji, where there are Hindus and Muslims. Subcontinentals are known as the Jews of the Orient and are obsessed with making money. They are rapidly enriching themselves to such an extent here that the Hindus were able to ignore parliament’s attempt to outlaw the caste system they are practising here.

        With this in mind, I looked up how long the Indian Raj lasted, only made possible with the connivance of native maharajahs. Britain took over direct control in 1858 from the East India Company after the Indian mutiny and India was independent in the late 1940s, thus not even a hundred years. Here in Britain the colonisation by subcontinentals began 60 years ago. Perhaps soon we will be able to make moves to gain our independence. Personally, I think that Enoch Powell got it wrong, perhaps he should have wandered around in a loin cloth like Ghandi. I don’t think he would have been assassinated back then here in England. That just shows the difference between what used to be England and the Indian sub-continent. The one was peaceful and civilised, the other anything but and this is what Powell predicted for us. He foresaw England turning into a mirror image of the Indian sub-continent and although he loved India for what it was, did not want England to be the same.

  11. With regard to your item on South Africa, European governments were, without doubt, behind the dismantling of apartheid as were the democrats in America. I am not sure about Soviet intervention as this was not made know then. And now we are seeing the result. Here in Europe, they thought it was a moral imperative because back then European countries were still more homogeneous than they are today.

    I am sure that there are many Europeans now, especially here in Britain where people white flight away from multiculturalism only to see it seeping into their still indigenous British areas of the country, are now beginning to think about it. They are wondering whether the time is now coming for separate homelands and as with the Afrikaaners for a separate homeland for what is left of the indigenous British and indigenous Britain. Of course, if you are going to have separate homelands then why not have separate countries the way it used to be and as nature intended? As for America, the landmass is so largely and the various populations so spread out that it was possible for the separate races to live apart or engage in sundown segregation. I get the impression that this is now changing however as the demographics shift to the disadvantage of Europeans.

Comments are closed.