Paul Weston uses the latest news about prison jihad in Yorkshire to illustrate the treasonous behavior of the globalist elites who have rammed Multiculturalism down the throats of Britons.
An Example of Left-Liberal Treason
by Paul Weston
There is a great deal of difference between times of peace and times of war. This may seem a very obvious statement, but I’m not sure left-liberals really understand the simplicity behind it.
Before mass immigration and multiculturalism so efficiently sickened the cultural, racial and body politic, it would have been impossible to blow up buildings, trains, planes and buses without first defeating the military defenders of the crushed nation. It would have been equally impossible to display foreign flags whilst loudly proclaiming they were destined to fly over government buildings; equally impossible that native soldiers should not wear their uniforms in public due to safety concerns; and equally impossible for soldiers in mufti to be murdered and decapitated in a city street just yards away from a military barracks.
We are clearly not living in a time of peace in Britain, but nor are we living in a time of war if war is judged in world-war historical terms. Perhaps it is best to say we are in a “sort of war” or a “low-level war” that, although hardly warranting the description “fully-fledged”, cannot be written off as unimportant and of no concern.
Britain’s security services have stopped Muslim terrorist atrocities like 7/7 each and every year since the last lot of Muslim jihadists slipped through the net and murdered and maimed people on our transport systems. Muslims routinely try to replicate this attack because Muslims consider themselves at war with us — be it as a claimed retaliation for our involvement in Iraq/Afghanistan, or simply because Britain is Koranically designated as part of the House of War not ruled by Muslims — as is their supremacist and divine right.
A similar low-level war has been waged against young indigenous girls in Britain, who have been chosen because they are the non-Muslim enemy and therefore deemed a permissible target of rape-jihad, which again is Koranically ordained. This monstrous evil has been going on for well over a decade, but has been deliberately covered up by the government, the police, the media and the social services.
And why did they cover it up? The reason, they tell us, is to ensure the laughable continuation of “community cohesion”, no matter there is no community cohesion in any geographical or societal area where Islam lives alongside non-Islam, or even where Sunni Islam lives alongside Shia Islam in the wider world.
But even citing community cohesion is disingenuous. If the left-liberal elites were truly concerned about cohesion, they would cover up all aspects of the failed ideology of multiculturalism, such as “right-wing” attacks on mosques, and not simply aspects where the consequences of Muslim barbarity reflect badly upon the Muslim perpetrators.
This explains why the BBC filled their studios with Muslim apologists after the 9/11 and 7/7 bombings, and also explains why the Times journalist Andrew Norfolk delayed breaking the news about Muslim gang-rapists on the grounds it would play into the hands of “far-right” groups who are clearly the enemy in the eyes of left-liberals.
Islam clearly considers itself at physical war with us, yet left-liberals consider themselves involved in an ideological war not with illiberal Islam, but with groups they label as far-right. This is a truly evil label when such people are in reality just normal, decent, liberal men and women whose only crime is to be indigenous white Christians who are understandably a tad miffed about their women being raped, their soldiers decapitated and their country and culture wrested from them by barbarian mono-culturalist Muslims.
So, we must admit we are in a low-level war, a clash of competing civilisations which, barely contained today, has the capacity to become an all-out civil war in the future as the internal enemy’s numbers grow. It is interesting therefore to take a look at who is on which side, and who has decided the racial/religious designation of the true enemy.
One side consists of Islam (not radical Islam, just Islam) and their left-liberal allies, the other side of indigenous Brits who would rather the country remained culturally, racially and religiously similar to the Britain they were born into, namely the Britain of their parents and grandparent’s generation.
Is it too provocative to suggest left-liberals have taken the Muslim side in this low-level war? I don’t think so. We have all seen and heard their reactions to the murder of Fusilier Lee Rigby, which was to essentially whitewash Islam and concentrate instead on defaming “right-wing” organisations such as the EDL and anybody else who had the temerity to associate Koran-quoting Islamic murderers with the political/religious/supremacist ideology of Islam.
We must not inflame and polarise opinion when it could result in “Islamophobia”, they tell us, yet they are more than happy to inflame and polarise EDLophobia it would seem, which is odd when the EDL exist purely as a reaction to Muslim violence. This perverse left-liberal alliance with Islam is particularly noticeable with regard to the BBC and The Guardian which both had the following to say about a particular event which occurred on Sunday last week.
First, the BBC: