“A Bad Wind Blows From Norway…”

“Who conspired?” is the real title of Bat Ye’Or’s new essay as it appears on the web site Druez.info. However, in snipping part of it to share with you, the lead sentence stood out as more accurate title for the first part of her essay; thus the substitution.

An even more telling label could have been, say, “Libeled by the Leftist Press Once Again”. The later section of her essay shows clearly that her choice of “Eurabia” as the name of her book was not a case of so-called Islamophobia or a conspiracy. As she clearly demonstrates, this was the name of a journal from the 1970s — a journal on Arab/European cooperation. But more on that subject further down…

Dr. Andrew Bostom gave us the heads-up on existence of Bat Ye’Or’s essay in English, for which we are most grateful. Her analysis of what is transpiring in Norway is insightful and chilling.

I have copied much of her text, but the images for the journal remain at the original site since we didn’t obtain permission to copy them.

In her own words [but with my emphases, especially at those points where she discusses issues we’ve not seen addressed elsewhere — D],here is an excerpt of “Who Conspires?”:

A bad wind blows from Norway onto the world.

It is not only the monstrous massacre by the deranged Breivik perpetrated for several hours without the police intervention. Now is added the political violence of a desperate government before the past elections— that it would probably have lost— if the horror caused by the killing spree of a psychopath, had not given it victory.

Exploiting politically this crime, the government launched its bloodhounds, its anathemas, its fatwas and edicts against all writers on the planet who, painfully defying terrorism, professional ruin and social ostracism imposed by the single thought, struggle to maintain democratic freedoms and human dignity in Western societies. The crime of Breivik strengthened the government party and took hostage the right to think, speak and criticize political power. It imprisoned Westerners in the jail of totalitarianism and intellectual tyranny by criminalizing critical thinking.

Did Breivik— unknown to the writers he cited but not the Norwegian police—read my books? Was he inspired by great names throughout the centuries of scholars, and writers he quotes or rather by the jihadists and terrorists he admires? Was he not guided by the exterminationist jihadist terrorism excused by his government? Let us remember Ma’alot and its Israeli schoolchildren massacred by the Palestinians, Beslan, Mumbai … New York (September 2001), Madrid (March 2004), London (July 2005) … the civil wars in Lebanon, the countless victims in Iraq, Egypt, Sudan, Nigeria …

Yet Norway — with a nominally democratic government — ignores the clear evidence of Hamas’ evil and continues to offer support, continues to indoctrinate its children against Israel. Whatever its flaws, Israel is a genuine democracy, the sole democracy in that region. Hamas is still a terror organization.

Am I the creator of a diabolical theory because I re-humanized in the concept of dhimmitude, the millions of victims of jihadist imperialism throughout the ages? Did I conceive a conspiracy because I studied its current extensions in modern Europe, as stated by a witch hunt organized by ignorant hacks who only rely on the defamation of a work they have not even read? Is it more moral to ignore these victims and side with their executioner, groveling to their ideology?

Those are rhetorical questions, of course but I’ll answer the last one: it’s not more moral, but ignoring the victims and siding with fellow totalitarians provides Norway’s elite an opportunity to demonstrate their solidarity.

At this point, Bar Ye’Or pulls out her information regarding the origin of the name Eurabia. As it turns out this wasn’t a product of her fevered Islamophobic fears after all:

So who invented Eurabia? Judge it yourself!

Here are two front sides of a journal called Eurabia. Look carefully at the dates: July and September 1975 for the numbers 2 and 3.

If you click on the site, Druez.info, scroll down to see the images of a magazine from 1975 with a most interesting name.

I didn’t copy them since I don’t have permission. But the dates are telling indeed. So Bat Ye’Or was demonized for ‘inventing’ Eurabia, even though the name had been previously used by a journal in print format back in the 1970s?

She shows the credits on the back of the journals:

Edited by the European Committee of Coordination of the Associations for the Friendship with the Arab World and produced with the collaboration of: Middle East International (London), France-Pays Arabes (Paris), and the Group of Studies on the Middle-East (Geneva).

And here she lays out the history of the main players back then: [again, all the emphases are mine- D]:

These groups and people were very well known in the 1960-70s and later. We learn who was Robert Swann from an article by Richard Eyre, written on September 2, 2009, published by The Council of Arab-British Understanding (CAABU), taken from the obituary in the Guardian (August 23, 2001).

According to the article, Robert Swann was secretary general of Amnesty International. The only son of German parents, he converted to Catholicism, and after a short stint at the Foreign Office he founded, in 1974, with the Labour MP Christopher Mayhew and French Raymond Offroy, a member of the National Assembly, the Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation (PAEAC). Posted in Paris, he became its first secretary general, a function to which was added the directorship of the Arab-Non Arab Friendship Fund (ANAF) located in Switzerland to finance the activities of this organization. Swann is credited with having convinced the European parliaments to adopt a unified position favorable to the Palestinians and the Arab world.

[Thus]The origin of the word Eurabia which earned me the wrath, the jeers and threats of self-righteousness Eurabians, then comes from the founders of PAEAC.

My book entitled “Eurabia” has a perfectly justified title because it examines the activities of the organization that itself created the name and politics associated with this word. My research examines books, official and unofficial documents and statements of the European Community, the Arab League and the Organization of the Islamic Conference, today Organization of the Islamic Cooperation. It is the PAEAC that, with the support of the European Commission, was responsible for conducting the unofficial policy of the Member States of the European Community with the Arab League countries under the umbrella of the Euro-Arab Dialogue, the formula credited to Michel Jobert, born in Meknes ( Morocco) and French Minister of Foreign Affairs (1971-73).

Ever since the publication of her book, the mud-slinging against Bat Ye’Or’s ideas has continued apace. For just one sample, see this excerpt from a wiki sub-sectioon of “unproved conspiracy theories”. Here we begin with the ever-wrong, ever-hopeful Economist:

The Economist, acknowledging that integration of immigrants was a difficult process, nevertheless rejected the concept of Eurabia as “scaremongering”. Simon Kuper in Financial Times described Ye’or’s book as “little-read but influential”, and akin to “Protocols of the Elders of Zion in reverse”, adding that “though ludicrous, Eurabia became the spiritual mother of a genre”. In another article, Kuper wrote that most academics who have analysed the demographics dismiss the predictions that the EU will have Muslim majorities.

Such Leftist notions fall under that all-too-familiar rubric, “fake but accurate”. They would be funny were they not so damaging. These jornolists, secure from the problems caused by the planned massive immigration of unassimilated third-world Muslims into Europe, continue to ignore the evidence even as Britain slides ever more deeply into the horrid hole created by an unsustainable welfare government.

“Conspiracy theory” my eye!

Perhaps there is hope? Here’s an item sent by a reader:.

74 per cent…think that the Government should slash benefits. Young and old, Labour and Tory, rich and poor: every single social group believes it is time to cut back.

As the pollster Peter Kellner points out, such public unanimity is almost unprecedented. And what’s more, 69 per cent believe our welfare system has ‘created a culture of dependency’, and that ‘people should take more responsibility for their lives and families’.

In other words, people are paying attention to reality. It’s a virtue the chattering classes, instead of stiff-arming uncomfortable facts, would do well to emulate.

9 thoughts on ““A Bad Wind Blows From Norway…”

  1. I’ve argued with people who are extremely opposed to islam and extremely knowledgeable about islam, that they should read Eurabia (I’m one of the few I know who has actually read her book). They respond “I’m not interested in conspiracy theories”. I retort “How is it a conspiracy theory if almost half of the book is given over to actual copies of the documents she refers to”? French standards in academic scholarship are often appallingly low, and no-one criticises people like Michel Foucault for making sweeping claims without a single footnote. Bat Ye’or has set her own standards exceedingly high — she does this also with The Dhimmi. Indeed, in Eurabia, she does point out that the word was the title of a 1970s journal (I think that Amnesty had a hand in the creation of the Eurabian project was not mentioned in the book).

    One thing that is very interesting about “Eurabia” is to examine the Amazon re-sale price for Bat Ye’or’s book — it remains high, close to the original selling price. Michael Gove’s “Celsius 7/7” was written in 2007, and is a fine summary of the counter-jihad position, yet it is available on Amazon second hand for a penny. Those people who bought Eurabia, are mostly not re-selling it; whereas many people who bought Gove’s book have sold it on.

    Compare that with other books written around the same time. Raheel Raza’s book (“Their Jihad”) is no longer for sale at all, whilst Eurabia is still in print. Clearly no-one is interested in buying a book on moderating islam – not muslims, not liberal dhimmis. Moreover, looking inside the front cover of a new copy of Eurabia, you will see the printing runs. It is re-printed every year, showing that demand has completely out-stripped the publishers’ expectations, year after year.

    These observations about publishing information pre-date Breivik’s lunacy.

    Since I’ve only come across 1 or 2 people in the CJM who have read Eurabia, one has to wonder who the people are who are buying it year after year, and holding onto these copies. But it is a testament to the power of scholarship that Bat Ye’or has managed to pivot the debate and understanding of the islamisation of Europe through her articulations of the historical phenomena of Dhimmitude and Eurabia. In fact, she inspired me to go off and do my own research into uncharted areas of islamisation – I’m too old and decrepit to challenge things physically, but I know how to research and how to write. There is much to discover and share, because what we are undergoing currently has been prefigured in islam’s other attempts to conguer the world.


  2. I would ask, Why care about Norway?”

    But, this sums it up:

    “A bad wind blows from Norway onto the world.”

  3. About Eurabia, I have an even more powerful concept. The West is not at all that dependent on Muslim oil, or things would be far, far worse. Already in the 19th century, Tesla discovered non-fossil fuel. This ether energy is has been used widely, albeit in secret.

  4. People with political incorrect ideas often need benefits more than Muslims. Think of job loss etc.

    And unlike Muslims, they do not have rich friends that are hurt by welfare (welfare makes it harder to procure cheap labor).

  5. I too have read the book Eurabia by this lady. It’s an eye opener and explains why a lot of what is happening now in the Middle East and Europe has come about.

    Those who wish to brush up on their knowledge of why Western governments have become besotted with the Muslim would do well to read Eurabia.

  6. The refusal to believe in conspiracy theories is a pc article of faith, or so I´ve come to believe. It´s astounding how almost all well informed people, even if they´ve left the progressive fold proudly declare themselves to be of independent mind in exactly this wording.
    Quite understandably of course; it was never in the interest of the greatest plotters in human history, the marxists, that people who noticed their covert maneuvers and manipulations behind the scenes would actually pay attention to what they discovered, let alone that they would hearken to what others might tell them

  7. I have to admit, given how many conspiracy theories turn out to be largely correct, I am baffled by the widespread disdain for them. I mean, obviously it’s in the interest of the conspirators to cast doubt on every revelation of their covert ambitions, but why do ordinary people go along with it?

    The fact is that most humans don’t “believe” anything in the sense of having a philosophical conviction that it is true so much as having a socially conditioned response to expect rewards for expressing belief or punishment for expressing disbelief. That is, their expression of belief is about as meaningful as a computer that is programmed to output the literal string “I love you!”. That doesn’t mean the computer has self-awareness or feelings.

    But the computer is merely incapable of such things. Humans can believe things out of a desire for truth and love of wisdom…but overwhelmingly choose not to do so.

    Chiu Chun-Ling.

  8. According to Daniel Pipes, Leftist Anti-Capitalism is itself a conspiracy theory.
    The same can be said about “white privilege” etc. Cultural Marxists assume all entepreneurs are bad willed racists, willing to sacrifice profits in order to discriminate.

  9. “why do ordinary people go along with it?”

    If conspiracies turn out to be true, people would have to act..Even more frightning: if even one of the cherished facts of your life and times turns out to be untrue, then what can a body believe?
    And what if your life was built around this supposition that has been so rudely deconstructed; how do you go on? Is there still enough left of your worldview to repair the damage, or are you sitting helplessly amidst the debris of a carwreck, way beyond the last possible U-turn?

Comments are closed.