Shills for Iran

I’ve written previously about Frank Gaffney’s presentation of evidence that the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is functioning as an unregistered agent of foreign governments, in express violation of federal law. In particular, CAIR may effectively be acting as a paid agent for Iran, which violates other federal laws restricting anyone who would operate domestically on behalf of the world’s foremost terrorist state.

In a follow-up article, Mr. Gaffney pointed out that CAIR’s membership — and thus its domestic financial support through member dues — has declined precipitously over the last few years. Yet is still a powerful lobbying organization and acts as the de facto “voice of American Muslims”. Even with its reduced funding, CAIR manages to mount numerous expensive lawsuits and other probes designed to inhibit criticism of Islam and advance the interests of Muslims in the United States.

So where does all that lawfare money come from? Once again, on today’s Big Government blog, Frank Gaffney turns his gaze turns towards Iran. As reported previously, much of the evidence for his case comes from information that was made publicly available at several of CAIR’s annual banquets:

Has CAIR Violated the Iranian Assets Control Regulations?

by Frank Gaffney

On November 12, 2009, the federal government moved to seize four mosques and a New York City skyscraper owned by the Alavi Foundation, a group allegedly under the direct control of the Iranian government. The following day, the Washington Times exposed the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) for allegedly lobbying on behalf of the Iranian government in violation of the Lobbying Disclosure Act and the Foreign Agents Registration Act. We believe that a third U.S.-based group may be guilty of illegal ties to Iran under the Iranian Assets Control Regulations: the Council On American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

On November 18, 2006 and November 23, 2008, CAIR held their gala annual fundraisers at the Marriott hotel in Arlington, Virginia. We’ve posted previously that the Interests Section of Iran attended both events. Because the U.S. and Iran do not have diplomatic relations, the Interests Section of Iran, sponsored by the Embassy of Pakistan, functions as the de facto embassy representing Iran’s government.

At the 2008 event, we recorded video of Master of Ceremonies and then CAIR-Tampa Executive Director Ahmed Bedier giving personal thanks to “the Interests Section of Iran” for their support:

Here’s more evidence that the “Interests Section of Iran” supported the CAIR fundraiser: the “Thanks to” pages of the 2006 and 2008 printed programs list the “Interests Section of Iran.”

– – – – – – – –
See the post at Big Government for images of the original documents that demonstrate Iran’s support for CAIR. The individuals and organizations who were thanked for their “support” of the banquet had demonstrated that support by purchasing table tickets at $2,500 to $3,000 each. That’s the way that Iranian government money is presumed to have made its way into CAIR’s coffers, and it may have been a violation of the Iranian Assets Control Regulations law.

Therefore, on November 6, 2009, the Center for Security Policy sent a letter to Mr. Adam J. Szubin, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury in which we suggested there is reasonable cause to believe the Council on American Islamic Relations violated the Iranian Assets Control Regulations in 2006 and 2008.

In the letter, we state:

“Our assessment of these documents is that they make a strong case that the Interests Section of Iran — the representative Iranian government entity and de facto embassy for Iran — may have purchased a table or provided a gift or donation of some kind at the 2006 and 2008 CAIR annual fundraisers, and therefore CAIR may have conducted a transaction with an Iranian government entity. That transaction may have involved their receiving a donation of financial value, in violation of 31 CFR Part 535, the Iranian Assets Control Regulations.”

Given that the Obama administration is in control of Iran policy at Treasury (and everywhere else in the federal behemoth), I’m not holding my breath waiting for a response from Mr. Szubin. However, CSP is to be commended for making the attempt.

CAIR, of course, has a acted as a shill for the Iranian regime in the past:

On September 8, 2006 — just two months before the annual fundraiser on November 18, 2006 — national CAIR leaders including Executive Director Nihad Awad and Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper welcomed Former Iranian President Mohamed Khatami to a gala private dinner attended by 400 invited guests. As the Khomeini regime’s Minister of Culture and Islamic Propagation in 1984, Khatami presided over the creation of Iran’s terrorist proxy Hezbollah, and just one year into his term as president in 1998 his intelligence service brutally murdered opposition reform leaders Darioush and Parvaneh Forouhar of the Iran Nation’s Party.

At that same 2006 CAIR banquet, Khatami was served papers for a legal suit by several Persian-Jewish families for the arrest and disappearance of twelve Persian Jews during his administration. In a similar incident in 2008, Executive Director Nihad Awad and his staff were served papers in a more recent lawsuit for fraud filed against CAIR by Muslim, African American, and Hispanic families.

We have requested the Office of Foreign Assets Control to investigate CAIR’s possible violations of the Iranian Assets Control Regulations, and have sent copies of the letter to members of Congress.

When CSP called up Ibrahim Hooper — CAIR’s National Communications Director — and asked him to comment on their investigation, he had nothing to say.

I wonder why?

One thought on “Shills for Iran

Comments are closed.