Did the authors of the Lisbon Treaty deliberately leave out the earlier constitutional proscription against child molestation? SIOE thinks so. Below is the latest press release from Stop the Islamisation of Europe:
Please read it right through.
The EU Lisbon Treaty of 2007, to all intents and purposes, is identical to the EU Treaty of 2004 (The EU Constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters), but with paragraphs being relocated and consequently renumbered.
Page 412 Article 21 of the Charter of the Lisbon Treaty is identical to Article 2-81 in the EU Treaty of 2004 and states, “Any discrimination on the basis of… sexual orientation or any other factor is prohibited”.
In all previous treaties, such as the Nice Treaty, there is a protocol which excludes paedophilia from the prohibition of discrimination (NJS 16 AUG).
Staggeringly, in the Lisbon Treaty, and also according to the view of the EU Information Office, there is no protocol on paedophilia!
The EU culture radicals have been there!
Without such a protocol, the Lisbon Treaty Article 21 legalises paedophilia in line with other sexual orientations. Some might argue that other articles in the Lisbon Treaty might be interpreted so as to contradict Article 21, but the fact is those writing the EU Charter Article 21 in the Lisbon Treaty were well aware of the exclusion of paedophilia from previous treaties.
So was this just an oversight? Hardly! Those national parliaments which have ratified the Lisbon Treaty have been asleep. Many, if not most, members of these parliaments have admitted they have not even read the Lisbon Treaty, preferring to entrust its construction to professional lawyers.
However, the authors of the Treaty have undoubtedly studied the earlier treaties carefully, to ascertain that all that they desired was carried over in the new treaty, while everything we the people want, was omitted. Government officials, therefore, have quietly but deliberately, chosen to preserve the nasty crime, paedophilia, so that it is now in our culture. Why?
The explanation is simple: they want to placate the Arab muslims. The explanation is simple: they want to placate the Arab muslims. The supposedly holy prophet was happy with little girls, and even his deputy, Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeinei wrote in his book Tahrirolvasyleh in 1990:
– – – – – – – – –
“A man can have sexual pleasure of a child as young as a baby. But he should not penetrate her vagina.” However, he declared the second form of child sex abuse is acceptable ….
This sounds ridiculous to a sane person’s ears, but actually, Europe, with France in the lead, has worked hard for a cultural, political and economic alliance/entente (“Eurabia”) with the Arab countries, particularly since the oil crisis in 1973. Of course, this “cooperation” includes the acceptance of Muslim culture including child pornography and even abuse — on European soil.
How can our politicians and our most senior lawyers have allowed this disgusting practice become a part of our way of life?
Can they REALLY have DELIBERATELY made paedophilia legal?
WHAT ELSE IS IN THIS DAMNED LISBON TREATY?
WHAT IS TO BE DONE WITH THESE POLITICANS AND LAWYERS WHO HAVE GRANTED CHILD ABUSE RESPECTABILITY?
What is to be done? Rope!
All the arguments justifying mainstreaming gay behavior, including those who are promiscuous (born that way, can’t change the object of their sexual attraction, no one can be expected to be celibate), have been trotted out by the pro-pedophilia crowd which is not as small as we would like and who have been emboldened and coalesced in the age of Internet pornography.
There is a major difference in that gay sex takes place between two consenting adults. That it does no harm to individuals or society is arguable with the advent of AIDS. However, in the case of pedophilia, there is inevitably a victim who cannot give meaningful consent and whose life is often irreparably damaged by the act.
Therefore pedophilia must not be allowed to ride into civilized societies on the coattails of the other sexual dysphorias that importantly do not victimize children.
I have searched the text of the Lisbon treaty and cannot find this passage. Does anyone have a link verifying the existence of this language in the treaty?
Look at it this way:
if a pedo would touch my childre, I would NOT discriminate against him.
I’d just bloody kill him in a very painful way.
To Iaine
You really should not post on topics you do not know anything about mate.
AIDS had nothing to do with Gays, and to say so is showing ignorance of the issue.