Donald Trump doesn’t have to make Sweden into a laughingstock; the Swedes are quite capable of doing it themselves.
The brief article below concerns the board of the Construction Workers’ Union and the wearing of pussy hats, the latest mandatory item of apparel for all self-respecting Progressives.
Many thanks to Tania Groth for translating this piece from Dissidenter.com:
Construction Workers’ Union buys pussy hats with membership’s money
[Text under photo: We firmly believe that we, as is the norm in society, also have the greatest responsibility to fight injustice]
The Construction Workers’ Union really did it today. On International Women’s Day every union member will see their members of the board in “pussy hats”. Pussy hats became a trend during protests against Donald Trump in connection with the Soros-funded “Women’s March”, where known Islamists fooled the participants into taking part of a protest that was more about Islam than women’s rights.
The Construction Workers’ Union is therefore next on the list to make fools of themselves. On their Facebook page all board members will be wearing a pussy hat. Take a close look, dear reader, notice that in the picture of the board, there is not a single woman as far as the eye can see.
As we have a feminist government where there is a decision on quotas for women on boards of government agencies, based on gender and not competence, it seems obvious that the Construction Workers’ Union are wearing pussy hats instead of maintaining the required gender quota of 50% of women in their union.
We have been in contact with the union, but they choose to keep a lid on it concerning the pussy hats. Our questions about how much of the member’s money has gone into the purchasing of the pussy hats and why they completely lack female representation on their board went unanswered.
the whole “pussy hat” idea was a reaction to Trump’s notorious sentence.
you want it or not, but by wearing these “pussy hats” people are saying truth to power.
neither Soros nor Islam are related to that simple fact, that current POTUS is callous exploitative cad in relation to women, and should be dealt with correspondingly.
the same way Obama deserves every imaginable contempt (even Trump’s contempt) for systematic planting of his version of Islamo-tribal universalism, and infiltrators networks, in Western institutions.
bad, but in no way can cancel Trump’s sins.
next point, women commit much less violent crime than men.
next point, women do suffer from rape and other sex-related violence much more than men.
next point, Western women are under threat of atrocious – and religiously sanctioned – Islamic sexual enslavement.
Western women must be protected.
from Islam.
from left-promoted degradation.
and also from Trump, exactly the same way as from any other lustful bully on the street.
maybe that is what these Swedes in hats, had in mind.
…
Trump talk crudely, but if you listen to the full video, it’s quite clear that while he’s a skirt chaser, he is into CONSENSUAL sex.
He is NOT a danger to women around him. Perhaps a “corrupting influence” or not the guy you’d want your daughter to bring home, but NOT a public menace or engaging in any criminal behaviour.
Which is more than one can say about some former presidents that never got the “pussy brigade” going after them.
Where would you prefer your daughter (or if you’re female, yourself) to spend the afternoon – in the Oval Office with Trump, or walking around Rinkeby? One might lead to an offer of consensual sex, which can be turned down, even if unpleasant. The other is likely to be a lot more than unpleasant.
Trump isn’t my idea of the ideal guy for my daughter to bring home, no doubt. But Trump is right about Sweden and he is NOT a menace to women. Very much the reverse.
agree.
I simply shifted emphasis a bit.
to the question of “poisonous” feminism, I would like to know how many people that poison killed until now.
if to compare for example with poisonous nationalism.
I know that it isn’t favourite topic here, but I remind again about Putin’s territorial expansion and war in Europe.
and Trump clearly colludes with Putin – why?
because there is a delusion about Great White Nationalist Conservive Ally in Kremlin that is why.
ten thousand only Ukrainian citizen killed.
let us discuss evils of feminism and all these despicable pussies.
…
…
Yes, AY. Poisonous nationalism. What a grasp of history.
Yes, THAT is what caused over 100M deaths in the last century. Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Castro, and Pol Pot – nationalist to the bone!
delusional much ,
Please, AY. Feminism’s agenda is poisonous and dishonest. The giddy malevolence of feminists is searching for men who will never walk on this earth and an acquiescence to their stupidity that will never happen.
Feminists are at war with themselves and nature itself, not Donald Trump.
Ay, I admit to being puzzled by your open hatred of President Trump; nor are you the only one. Trump hires women, they speak well of him, and you might have noticed he’s married to one, his campaign manager was a very capable woman, and still the idiots call him a woman hater!
The President is also insanely labelled ‘anti-Semitic’, despite the fact his son-in-law is a Jew and his daughter has adopted the Jewish faith and he seems to love her dearly. President Trump has already accomplished more in seven weeks than his predecessor did in eight years, yet Obama, who was given every opportunity, just drove the country ever deeper into debt, while hoisting the flag of islam at every opportunity–as he said he would.
While President Trump still has not indicated he intends to round up and deport the enemy known as C.A.I.R., it’s still early days, and we can live in hope. In the meantime, perhaps Americans and even Canadians should quit snivelling, stop lying about him, and just give the man a chance. I’m sick of hearing the man slandered.
you are mistaken in one point: men are the preferred victims of sexual violence all troughout the world, in much a bigger rate than women. Not only in the Islamic countries, where the women, at least, are “protected” to a certain degree, by their families and husbands, but also in the Western countries.
In every loose society, which is most of the world except the richest countries, young boys are easy pray. In rich societies, whre morality is (was) much more enforced, where women are specially protected, you still have prisons, where, depending on the country, they may constitute some kind of enforced rape-punishment, specially for men (but also for women). You can find enough available material about the American prisons, but, please, keep in mind, that, notwithstanding sexual predations in the prisons of the US, these are not the worst in the world.
We still have to see a single feminist complaining about the suffering of men caused by the law-enforcing system, which sends, for every one women, ten men to prison. No parity-quotas there.
Err…. maybe fewer women commit crimes?
So if more women went to prison it would be okay if they’re raped there?
I was referring to alien_specimen’s last paragraph, Colonel. I don’t know how accurate his figures are for rapes of men in prisons, but women are of course not available there.
Western women must be protected from Islam.
Why?
Stop waving refugees welcome banners, stop attacking white males, stop defending moslems, stop supporting progressive leftist, then we can talk about blanket protection of females. At this point roughly 50 percent of women (or more) vote liberal-progressive. Do not expect us to fight for them. They are the problem.
Now what would happen if men started wearing penis hats? Women have complained for centuries that men think with this member. How is it an improvement to “think” with women’s genitalia instead?
The world grows more trivial every day.
They would look as ridiculous as they look with “pussy” hats.
🙂
Quite an amusing idea, but equally risible. Can’t people see they are being used? They are colluding with their own deception. The globalists must have such fun inventing new demeaning actions for their sheep to mimic.
With no end in sight.
It’s an occasional necessity for infantry leaders to call in artillery on themselves as a last resort. In the conflagration that will ensue in the West, I take comfort in the fact that these pitiful excuses for men will die as well. No doubt while offering flowers and cookies to placate our enemies. Presumably crawling on their bellies at the time to signify they are no threat at all.
Agreed, the first thing I thought of when I saw the picture was “I wonder if they knitted them themselves”. I just sit here shaking with laughter and sign in a resigned manner, “Oh well, that’s humanity, seldom right, but never in doubt”.
[redacted]
I saw a couple of guys wearing them here in Seattle – ‘guys’ right out of liberal central casting.
And the women are laughing at these clowns.
Not enough of them to matter, apparently.
I love Seattle, but the dinks & yuppies have destroyed it; not too far behind San Francisco in liberal lunacy…
In Sweden for pity’s sake?
These effeminate, intellectually castrated “men” should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves!
Is there not one drop of Viking blood in their veins?
Hopefully their union membership will resign on mass and
Join an alternative union organisation run by men and women with a few brain cells between their ears.
When I see reports such as this I don’t know whether to laugh or cry, to think that these idiots will have mother’s, aunties,
Sisters, nieces, and female colleagues who could be looking to them for protection in the future?
Looks like kitty litter to me
Flashmob at Stockholm Central Station
https://youtu.be/ZxKm1_JsQJQ
This is reminiscent of a few years back,when these faireys were trying to get construction workers to wear leather mini-skirts,fortunately this did not take,but it seems that they have become even more barmy.
“Much less violent crime than men?” Not since Sheri Finkbine.
Could the humiliation of western men be any more complete?
No. They’re just getting warmed up.