20 thoughts on ““The Islamic State is Already Here in Europe””

1. “…we need to bury mujahideen in pigskins”

   This is sooo much against any PC-rule that snowflakes would rather watch getting their families slaughtered by mujahideen.
   But I like the concept.
   Actually it`s quite elegant and witty. 😉

   • When I read, ‘As you may remember from last year, this is the same man who explained that we need to bury mujahideen in pigskins, because that’s what has always worked,’ I thought what a pity this isn’t a parody or a satire–in any normal world, and, unfortunately, out there in much of our current abnormal world, any ‘expert’ who suggested such a thing would be laughed out of credibility. But, alas, this isn’t a normal world any more, and at least among those who are still blessed with a modicum of commonsense, the expert brave enough to suggest such a precaution can be recognised as giving sage advice.

2. Here is the previous video of Miklós Maróth: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MUjD9Y-bI0

   • And here’s the GoV post with the transcript.

3. When you must adapt to Islamic rules, Islamic rules are here. Europe must behave nice so they are not upset. That means they are the important element.

4. For the poor Anglo in Germany wondering what to do, the solution is to leave-escape-depart-emigrate. Fly to the USA and leave it all behind.

   • Nope. Euro failures are NOT welcome in the USA.

     • And in any case, you allready have your own counter-jihad.

     • I stand corrected; I’ve been told that the strong DNA left for America centuries ago and I know that those who remain are brain washed marxists. It was a knee jerk reaction to an article and I retract the comment.

       • No! Retract your retraction! The only White guys under 60 here in the U.S. who are as tough as Tommy Robinson and his friends (not to mention Tyson Fury, but I guess he considers himself Irish not English) are Russian and Ukrainian. (The tough Italians are over 60 now.)

   • If I might respectfully disagree with skzion — in actual fact, poor Anglos are VERY welcome here, and will have no trouble getting dates. Expect lots of friendly remarks and questions at Keyfood and the laundromat. You’ll immediately make friends. The girls at Starbucks and behind the counter at Barnes&Noble will be eager to assist you with your purchases, and men will ask you for your opinion on economics, Martin Amis, and David Bowie. We want you all to come! We need you, in fact!

5. Well, talking about it at all is kind of a waste of time, since the voters in the larger and more influential European countries do not seem to respond to the actions of Muslims. Yet, there are a few points to clarify.

   Muslims do not have to be a demographic majority to bring about sharia. Democracies and republics are extraordinarily susceptible to interest groups and identity groups. Most politicians are not going to stray too far from the center, so when political races are close, an identity group with a disciplined voting block has an enormous amount of influence. Muslims are, and will be, very able to protect both their proselytizing and their enforcement of sharia-compliance.

   As the professor points out,the Muslims are building a totally parallel and separate social structure. They not only have separate Islamic banking and money transfer, but separate education, separate eating facilities and preparation, separate education and separate community groups. It is not well known, but Muslims do not even accept the western concept of insurance. So, Muslims organize separate insurance and protection structures.

   Which makes you wonder what they’re doing here in the first place. Virtually the only aspect of Western life they integrate themselves with is the structure of employment and to a certain extent, entrepreneurship. Of course, the Muslims receiving welfare are not even plugged into employment, and as far as their cultural identification and milieu, might as well be back in Afghanistan, Syria, Morocco, Pakistan, or wherever.

   But, as I say, the citizens and certainly the governments, of the major European countries simply do not respond to analytical views of Islamic immigration. They might get a bit bestirred when thousands of autos are burned, women raped, youngsters molested, women are groped, fireworks are shot at New Years celebrations and police cars, and so forth, but the governments attempt to paper over the problems with massive police mobilization, and so far, the populace seems to kind of go along.

   The West does have a reprieve for the next 4 or 8 years which it may not deserve. Under Trump, it’s pretty clear NATO will not be used as the enforcer for the EU and the edicts of its bureaucrats in dealing with breakaway states such as Hungary and Poland.

6. What is important from what the academic is saying, the “Islamic State” does not require to have border to exists… They do not need to openly conquer and put the flag out, open border control and issue IS visas, – how maybe a secular thinking would see it, but to exists as a parallel with the other society. They collecting taxes, they established their financial and economical bases (halal stores etc). If you think about it that means they are in USA too, Dearborn, MI comes to mind. The collected taxes (zakat) goes to funding Jihad. Social benefits paid for this professional parasites are funding killing people. That is why I believe they will be no peaceful coexistence with muslims. Even the so called “moderate” ones are complicit in Jihad and murders and spreading this cancer.

   • “No peace can be made between us [Muslims] and the non-believers.
     This what our holy book says. This what Allah says”,
     Yusuf Al Qaradawi,
     Spiritual Guide to Muslim Brotherhood.
     http://www.libertygb.org.uk/news/extremism-–-there-problem-within-islam

7. The mere fact of a parallel set of Muslim structures means that they are engaged in a criminal conspiracy. In the US, RICO could deal with Islam very effectively, making it impossible to recruit or flourish. Barely a single mosque would remain is the law were pursued diligently.

8. The introduction to this video states: “The following clip from Hungarian TV features an interview with an orientalist professor named Miklós Maróth. As you may remember from last year, this is the same man who explained that we need to bury mujahideen in pigskins, because that’s what has always worked.”

   The reference is to https://gatesofvienna.net/2016/09/miklos-maroth-we-should-deport-criminal-and-non-integrated-muslims/ , which states:
   “So what I mean is, for example in Pakistan, when the English could not stop the wave of suicide attacks, because suicide bombers ‘immediately entered heaven’ since they were waging a ‘holy war’. So the English had been looking for a solution and finally found it: the captured suicide bombers were hanged wrapped into pigskin. The attacks stopped at once, because they became ‘unclean’ by the touch of the pig and so ‘could not enter heaven’.”

   Sorry, but I’m dubious of this evidence. This historical method must have depended on the superstitious ignorance of the perpetrators. (And why were dead suicide attackers hanged in pigskin, long after they had been raptured into Paradise at the moment of their death?) Surely the scholars of today’s ulema can figure out a way to comfort even unsuccessful suiciders, such as with an argument that appeals to necessity, so that being killed by a pigfat-impregnated bullet through the brain will not deprive a would-be martyr of his reward of 72 celestial virgins. (How could Allah be so cruel to his loyal underlings?)

   Question: Where is the Islamic scripture on which Miklos Maroth’s argument is based? Please cite the Quranic aya or the sahih hadith. I would ask for a ruling on this at https://islamqa.info/en , but its proprietor has never answered any of my inquiries. But there must be lots of Islamic scholars who are surreptitious fans of Gates of Vienna. C’mon fellas, whatdaya say? Let’s have a fatwa.

9. Proof for the Muslim strategy that Prof. Miklós Maróth points to fe. can be found in the strategy papers of the Muslim Brotherhood that have been found in Switzerland during a police raid.
   As in the works of Prof. Ali Kettani who propagated this allready in the 1980`s, in books such as “Muslim minorities in nonmuslim states and their solutions”.

   Published by a Saudi NGO`s in London (also accredited by the UN as an NGO).

10. And the founder of the turkish Milli Görüş, Necmettin Erbakan (former turkish Prime Minister and Mentor of todays PM Erdogan) in April 2001 talked about the same to his followers.
    Which was documented by the German “Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung” and the “Verfassungsschutz”.

    Former turkish PM Erbakan:”Europeans belive, that muslims came to Europe looking for work. But Allah has another plan.
    We will come to power, with or without bloodsheed this remains an open question.”

11. As I read this, I kept thinking of the original Gates of Vienna and how emasculated Europe has become since then, with the exception of Hungary and Poland who evidently have not forgotten their history.

    What is wrong with these people? Is it ignorance, stupidity, or the old story of hoping the crocodile eats them last?

    To be fair, we in USA have also forgotten history, witness the latest atrocity of the black children attacking a white guy who is mentally not quite there.

    May God have mercy on us and on Europe. Of course, not many people pray anymore which might be part of the problem. I will have read my copy of the history again, just to remember how “civilized” the muslims are (NOT).

    • “What is wrong with these people? ”

      This is the wrong question. The people are going to act like they act. It doesn’t really matter why. The questions are:
      1) Can their actions be changed, and if so, how?
      2) How can the active opposition to Islamization act to neutralize the sympathizers or enablers?

      I would guess that people who are habitually in favor of Muslim migration will stay that way. What little evidence I’ve seen suggests that leftist migration supporters simply do not respond to arguments, logic, or facts. Ali Sina on his website, used to claim that revealing the truth of Islam will cause massive defections. Ali Sina is barely active, if at all, but Islamists are going full steam.

      The best way to oppose Islamization is to ensure the independence of countries dissenting from the EU mandate of open borders. The election of Trump was probably the best contribution US voters could have made, as it is quite certain the US will not allow NATO to be used for internal enforcement actions against countries such as Hungary.

      It is also desirable, and quite possible, for the Visegrad countries and other small countries to exit the EU completely now, while the getting is good. This includes the associate member, Switzerland, which appears to have exchanged its vaunted independence for a few dollars in trade. If they get out now, they will have 4 or 8 years to establish a fait accompli. Their independence will likely be permanent, as long as they don’t do anything stupid, like directly challenge the EU militaries. There is much to learn from the relations between Finland and Russia during the cold war, although Finland appears to have voluntarily surrendered its cultural identity.

      This is my own view, but I think the countries protecting their independence should focus on maintaining the quality of their populations, regarding not only intelligence but the public virtues, including courage, conscience, and community mindedness. A welfare state is directly anathema to maintaining the quality of the population. I can make the detailed arguments elsewhere.

Comments are closed.