7 thoughts on “Mayor Robert Ménard: Leading the New French Resistance”

1. Thanks for this. I watched it twice on Vlad’s, after Vera’s recommendation. It is difficult to tease out all the meanings when everyone is talking, but reading the transcript gave me a better grasp of the conversation.

   And so Mayor Menard might sound like Front National?? How very awful! Do they not ever ask themselves why Marine Le Pen? Why now?

   They don’t because those self-satisfied talking heads will never have to deal with their children – if they even have any – being bullied by a group of menacing older boys who mean to do them bodily harm. But if the national government keeps it up, space will fill up and they will find themselves afraid to go out at night without a body guard.

   In all the EU, I would recommend that boys with a talent and the musculature for it train as bodyguards. It must be one of the most growth-oriented careers in the West by now. I’m glad my young grandson is taking martial arts lessons for fun, just because he likes it. The time may come when he has to use what he’s learned to protect himself and his kin.

   Of course with the parasitic growth of government, one could always train for the civil service and be assured of a cubicle somewhere. The world needs the great productivity that paper-pushing brings to the marketplace.

2. Quote from Dennis Wheatley author

   http://www.denniswheatley.info/sams_books/lettertoposterity.htm

   And this is the ultimate outcome of the false, pernicious doctrine that all men are equal. Socialism is but a halfway house.

   Therefore, if when this document is discovered, the people of Britain are bound to a state machine, my message to posterity is REBEL. All men are not equal. Some have imagination and abilities far above others. It is their province and their right to take upon themselves the responsibility of leading and protecting the less gifted.

   We are sent into this world to develop our own personality – to use such gifts as we have been given and to set an example to others by our courage, fortitude, sympathy, generosity and self-reliance. Any state which controls the lives of the people and dictates where they shall live, what work they shall do, what they shall see, say, hear, read and think, thwarts the free development of personality, and is therefore EVIL.

   It will be immensely difficult to break the stranglehold of the machine, but it can be done, little by little; the first step being the formation of secret groups of friends for free discussion. Then numbers of people can begin systematically to break small regulations, and so to larger ones with passive resistance by groups of people pledged to stand together – and eventually the boycotting, or ambushing and killing of unjust tyrannous officials.

   Your life does not matter, but your freedom does. The age-old wisdom tells us that death is not to be feared, for it is but a release from life, leading to rebirth, and if one has lived and died courageously, as a finer, stronger personality. Therefore, if need be, fight for your RIGHT to live, work and love, how and where you will. If need be die for it. Your death will be an example to others that it is better to die fighting for your freedom and happiness than to live on as a slave.

   May the courage and wisdom of the Timeless Ones, who order all things, be your support and guide. They will never fail you if you have faith in yourself.

   Blessings be upon you; freedom and love be with you.

   • I read most of Wheatley’s novels in my youth, Bishop. He was an excellent writer of thrillers, both historical and involving black magic.

     However it’s little wonder he’s gone out of fashion; the racist attitudes apparent in his fiction are even more explicit in his “Letter to Posterity”, which I’d not seen till now.

     Also his nostalgia for rule by some kind of elite (written just after the defeat of fascism!) assumes a correlation between intelligence/ability and moral superiority; almost the entire history of humanity suggests otherwise- democracy and free speech should be our best defence against abuse of power.

     He also has a major blind spot over why Churchill, a better defender of democracy than practitioner (eg his attitude to Gandhi), lost the 1945 election; many servicemen resented the snobbery of the officer class, and saw Labour rather than the Conservatives as the party more likely to address this.

3. “shows a segment of a progressive talk show (is there any other kind?) ”

   That’s a big fat NO.

   Take it from moi.

4. What I took from this is that the talking heads are offended by the public display of posters regarding the invasion.
   “Why don’t you put them in mail boxes?”
   Better yet, why don’t you start a whisper campaign because openly discussing this invasion is simply beyond the pale. Talking about the negative effects to schools, historic locations and quality of life must not be allowed! It is gauche.
   I recall that during the Brexit campaign Mr. Ferrage came under huge attack for putting a large poster of the hordes marching into the EU on the side of his campaign bus…
   Hate, incitement, xenophobia!
   It just doesn’t wash anymore with the common man. Only die hard ideologues and those elite enough to insulate themselves from the invasion can still argue that this should be forced on the common population.

5. Good for him and hopefully the nations who refuse to take in the refugees will stand their ground. Hopefully if Trump wins and becomes President he’ll side with these countries against the EU. Time to pull out of Germany and let them take care of their own defense. Hopefully Trump will stem the flow of Muslim refugees into America. If Hillary wins then with 650,000 so-called refugees the burqa and niquab or full body tent could become a common sight in America. If one says anything they’ll most likely get arrested for a hate crime. We should write letters of support to the resisting presidents of these nations. Baron maybe sell No Sharia Law in America bumper stickers and T-shirts as both a fund raiser and to get the message out.

   • The legislatures of several states have utilized ALAC – American Laws for American Courts – to prevent the imposition of sharia law in contravention of the Constitution. However, both Obama and Clinton believe it’s time to discard the Constitution and move into modern rule by oligarchy.

     It does no good to say “No Sharia Law” unless you have set up a strong resistance. Which is what ALAC does. A fund-raiser to drown out the Democrat moneybags? Won’t happen…

     This list isn’t up to date but it’s a good overview:

     http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/tag/american-laws-for-american-courts/

     State legislators MUST understand what a strong constitutional wording would entail in their own writing of laws. When Oklahoma’s legislature passed a “No Sharia” referendum in order to get it before the voters, that’s when the deficiencies of such attempts became obvious.

     Fortunately, David Yerushalmi is an expert on Constitutional Law. He has done other work, too, including a study of mosques that Trump could use if he were to examine radical mosques after he’s elected. In a just world, Yerushalmi would have long since received the Medal of Freedom.

Comments are closed.