9 thoughts on “From Matt Bracken: Hijab is NOT Voluntary; It’s Slavery

  1. Islam is, indeed, slavery but it’s incredible how many intelligent Americans refuse to acknowledge it. I debated with a liberated woman on whether Sharia law could co-exist with Constitutional law. Muslims have rights, she said, and if they want Sharia law in the United States then it should be so.

    I pointed out the abuses Islam heaps on women to include forcing women (children, by U.S. standards ) to marry. Her face clouded with indecision. Her proud, authoritative voice became a halting whimper as she tried to formulate a counter-argument. I knew I had scored some heavy points, and at least forced her to reconsider a blind obedience to the PC crowd.

    • Ingrid,

      What degree of ignorance was that – Sharia Law is mainly about LEGAL persecution of infidels – to even suggest it could co-exist with Democracy and secular institutions is an Absolute Lie. It may take many years but it’s just a matter of time before they start showing their fangs – esp. once their population has grown.

      Meanwhile they misuse their legal privilege to isolate their Muslim population from any interaction with the host population and also prevent them from being protected by secular laws – in essence sand-boxing the Saudi Culture in the western environment. This guarantees that they will view their hosts as hostile enemies in perpetuity, hence the final justification to slaughter their hosts is assured.

  2. Definitely spot on again Matt.
    As Dr. Bill Warner mentioned in his video on the hijab, it isn’t merely a choice of clothing; it’s a subtle yet potent political statement declaring one’s declaration of support affirming sharia.

    My only criticism is that people keep referring to islam as ‘radical islam’.
    Again, as Dr. Warner has shown, there is no ‘radical islam’ or ‘moderate islam’..there’s only islam and it’s nature in it’s orthodoxy is schizophrenic…seemingly peaceful when politically weak and then psychotically violent when strong.

    In the final analysis, moslems can’t be trusted and islam has no business being in the West, let alone in America!

    Yours in Liberty! Death to islam!
    NorthGunner III

    • “My only criticism is that people keep referring to islam as ‘radical islam’.
      Again, as Dr. Warner has shown, there is no ‘radical islam’ or ‘moderate islam’..there’s only islam and it’s nature in it’s orthodoxy is schizophrenic…seemingly peaceful when politically weak and then psychotically violent when strong.”

      It’s discouraging that almost 15 years after 9/11, the majority of Americans don’t know this. I cringe every time I hear ‘radical islam’ especially from the conservative side.

      • Islam is more like NAZIism than Communism. We can coexist with the second–and did for 60 odd years. But not with NAZIism. “peaceful when politically weak and then psychologically violent when strong”, is how the NAZIs behaved in the 1930s.

        Communism had many humanistic values, in theory. But the NAZIs were based on arrogance and superiority. Ans glorified militarism. Western civilization has to start thinking of Islam like the NAZIs.

        Once i started to do this, every thing cleared up in terms of my understanding. There’s too many simularities.

  3. In Canada, we even let women cover their face during the citizenship ceremony. Most people who support this have no idea how our culture is being systematically undermined. They think they are being liberal and tolerant. Unfortunately, because our PM Trudeau is a globalist, we will increasingly see Canadian identity eroded — at least on the Anglo side. You can even be a dual-citizenship terrorist and keep your Canadian citizenship and the protections it affords. We cannot even summon the moral courage to acknowledge that honour killings and genital mutilation are worthy of being called `barbaric`.

    • What wing of any other religion–radical or not– justifies ‘genital mutilation’ in the 21st century?!

      IN THE 21st CENTURY!

  4. In the interests of accuracy, I’m not sure that the second acid-attack victim counts as a victim of Islamic misogyny:

    A woman who threw acid in the face of a friend while wearing a veil as a disguise has been jailed for 12 years. Naomi Oni, 22, suffered burns to her face and chest in the attack near her home in Dagenham, east London, in December 2012. Mary Konye, 22, of Canning Town, allegedly attacked Ms Oni because she had called her ugly.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-26680664

    But third-world immigration was definitely at work.

Comments are closed.