A Czech doctor named Vladislav Rogozov has caused a ruckus in Britain by publishing uncensored information about the Islamization of the UK in his native language. He works at a hospital in Sheffield, and has seen up close the effects of Islam in England. Back in January he gave an interview to Parlamentní listy in which explained the urgent necessity for the Czech Republic to avoid going down the same path as the UK.
Eventually excerpts from the interview were translated into English, and that’s when the trouble started. Dr. Rogozov’s willingness to tell the truth has landed him in hot water.
First, however, let’s look at what he had to say. The complete text of the interview is below; many thanks to Xanthippa for the translation. The text has also been posted at Vlad Tepes:
The Shocking Words of a Czech Physician Living in England: Female Muslim Physicians Are Refusing to Remove Their Headscarves Upon Entering the Operating Room, Muslim Physicians Leave Their Patients to Go Pray, the Reading of the Koran During Surgery
23 January, 2016
Interview
For more than 10 years, the Czech physician Vladislav Rogozov has been working at a teaching hospital in Sheffield, England. With this look at the current Islamization of Great Britain, he is attempting to bear witness to this serious danger to our homeland, in order that the Czech Republic might recognize this danger in time and not end up as tragically [as Great Britain]. He speaks of criminality growing out of the clash of different cultures, which was actively kept secret by the police, the politicians and the social workers. The victims of criminal acts have even been threatened in order to withdraw their testimony.
Tell us, how, from your point of view, what did the relatively recent Christmas celebrations look like in ‘good old England’? Have you noticed some difference to what it was like when, eleven years ago, you first came to Great Britain as a physician?
Christmas celebrations looked the same as all of England looks like — two parallel worlds and growing Islamization. In the countryside, where we live, there was a picturesque English Christmas, filled with carols and traditions. In many Muslim suburbs, there was no mention of the origin of Christmas. Its original meaning is intentionally being drowned in commercialization. Year after year, one can feel the growing influence of Islamization and political correctness.
For example, at a nearby school, the headmaster had, for the first time this year, banned the Christmas Tree. On BBC, I have, for the first time, noticed the greeting “Salaam Aleikum Merry Christmas”. And in one comedy show on BBC on Christmas Eve, they did not lay Baby Jesus in the manger, but Baby Mohammed. I guess it no longer surprises me.
What led you to start writing on your blog, the year before last, about the ongoing Islamisation of Great Britain, and to raise the warning, to prevent something similar from happening in the Czech Republic?
In 2005, when I received the offer to work at the Teaching Hospital in Sheffield, I did not hesitate for a minute. It was a professional and personal challenge. I had always admired England for all the good it had brought to humanity. A few days after arriving, on Thursday 7th July, I traveled from Sheffield to London to the General Medical Council. I did not make it to London that day. British Muslims had attacked innocent people, they killed dozens of them and injured hundreds. It was a total shock.
Yet it took me several more years before I would admit to myself that the process of Islamization is going on across the whole country, and that this process is no longer reversible.
In the year 2009 we had a reunion with other former students of the Medical School. When I told them that multiculturalism is not working in Britain, that it is just Islamization, none of them wanted to believe me. That is when I realized how easy it would be to underestimate this risk, if we do not pay attention to it in time. We are dealing with a huge problem, which concerns not just our safety, but the whole structure of our culture. However, the majority of Western politicians has not even dared to name it directly.
How would you describe it yourself?
Today, it is absolutely clear that in Europe there is a growing confrontation between two civilizations — the European democratic one and the Islamic theocratic one.
European culture is based on democracy, freedom, rule of law, individuals, critical thinking, the equality of people of differing opinions and genders. In contrast with this, Islamic culture is based on religious dogmatism, absolute veneration of religion, irrational obedience of the text of the Koran. From this then grows its intolerance of people with differing opinions or sexual orientation, or to the inequality [under the law] between men and women.
The values of these two systems are sufficiently different that they cannot exist at the same place and time without competing with each other. This clash can only have one of two results — either continuing Islamization or a long-term conflict. The probability that Islam might undergo some enlightened renaissance process is very low. For some countries, no good solution exists any longer.
I believe that the Czech Republic may yet avoid this. But not much time remains.
What do you see as the root causes of this?
The causes for the current movement of numerous Muslim populations into Europe are various. In many countries, the starting factor is post-colonial heritage and a myopic solution to the problem of the ageing of the European population due to low birth rates. The desire of closed Muslim communities to integrate into the majority culture is miniscule. To the contrary, their motivation for expansion and Islamization is immense. The existence of these communities has therefore brought great problems to all the Western countries that had, in good faith, undertaken this experiment.
Parallel worlds with parallel values were created, even including parallel legal systems. For example, in Britain, there exist dozens of Sharia tribunals.
The integration of Muslim communities had failed. It is not possible to integrate someone by force, against their will. The British government invests great resources and will into various integration programmes, without results.
For example, David Cameron announced that he will provide £20 million for a project to teach Muslim women to speak English, because a large majority of them do not even speak English. He immediately faced criticism from many Muslims that this is discriminatory and putting labels on people, and the British Muslim women don’t even have to speak English because they only go outside with their husbands, and so on.
Do we want to once be facing similar problems in the Czech Republic?
So, is Islam to blame for this state of things?
It is difficult to blame Islam for self-propagation; this is what it has always done and it has never attempted to hide it. The main problem is the weakness of our current European society and a crisis in values. If any living system, from a single cell to the whole of human community, gives up on its own defense and on maintaining its own integrity, it will most certainly perish. And it will free up living space for those more capable of survival.
Europeans have been lulled by long-lasting safety and prosperity. They have given up on the vigorous defense of its basic values; they consume experiences and give birth to too few children. It would be unnatural if such a weakness were not exploited by another, expansive culture to spread further. After all, freedom, democracy and the rule of law are not the products of safety, but its preconditions. If we do not defend these values, even with the use of force [if necessary], we will lose it all.
Has Europe not primarily caused these problems for herself?
A terrible mistake has been made with the series of unnecessary interventions in the Middle East. The result is our own weakening, the rise of Islamic terror, regional wars, chaos, unrest, the migrant crisis. Instead of exporting democracy — using force — into places where it has no chance to work, we should focus on vigorous defense and promotion of democratic values at home in Europe.
Another observation from here, in England, is the national self-flagellation. English people are raised to feel guilty for colonialism and from this flows this need for self-sacrifice in favour of peoples from the former colonies.
One of my friends, an English teacher, told me recently: “Thank you for opening my eyes. Until now, I had actually been ashamed of my English identity. Now I see that I have something to be proud of.” I think that many Germans have also approached this migrant wave while under the influence of the lingering shame for the war. However, we can do great harm with ill-considered acts of goodness.
You work at the cardiovascular clinic in a teaching hospital in Sheffield, you are teaching University students. How has it affected you personally, when the situation has led you to admit that you have started to fear Islam, that you have become an Islamophobe?
We meet almost daily with the manifestations and effects of Islamization, and every day its evolution truly greatly worries me. I fear the loss of our cultural identity, ideologically motivated violence and the danger of increasing fascism of a part of our European community. When I look at how England is changing, I become very sad. Many places now look like the streets of Pakistan. Yet much more important than appearances are the values that Islam brings with it.
I have deep respect for every human being, including every individual Muslim I have come into contact with, be it as a patient, a relative or a fellow physician. However, I do not have respect for the Islamic culture — it brings us unequal position of women before the law, intolerance to differences, racism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, honour killings, female circumcision, Sharia, torturing of animals and other medieval “advances”.
Yet, an even worse danger is ideologically motivated violence. It is a proven fact many times over that Islam has the potential to inspire its followers to commit violence against innocent people. For that, it is sufficient to follow the daily news. Nobody can deny the fact that in the 21st century, the largest source of ideologically motivated violence comes from the Islamic environment.
Quite simply, until Islamic culture places human life above obedience to Allah, some Muslims will not stop killing in the name of Allah. And that is a sufficient reason to be afraid. However, Islamic culture cannot be forced into a renaissance of change; it has to arrive at it itself. Until that happens, we either have to defend ourselves against it or let ourselves be Islamized.
A no less disturbing effect of Islamization is the danger of radicalization of indigenous Europeans. Unless political representatives find the courage to name and solve this problem in a timely way, we may fear the rise of extremist and fascistic tendencies.
Less than a year ago you wrote that in multicultural Britain, there is an absolutely never-before-seen range of brutal rape and sexual slavery of children, and that the majority of the perpetrators are British Muslims of Asian descent, and their victims are white English children. This information has not surfaced here, and you have been accused in some discussions that you are making this up and that the officials did not cover this up. What would you say to that?
This is a specific type of crime which arises from the clash of differing cultures. Because it deals with criminality with a racial motivation, nobody dared to publish the truth for years. It was actively hidden by the police and social workers. Victims of criminal acts were even threatened, to make them recant their testimony. It is absolutely shocking, where Islamization in combination with political correctness leads. But I have described that in my post “About the Rape of Children…”
If you are asking me about personally assigning guilt, I do not solve this. Idiots exist everywhere; they are cowardly and hide behind anonymity. Everything I have written about this problem is supported by evidence published by British institutions and thus easily provable. The victims’ testimonies are available for viewing on-line on BBC iPlayer. I personally know the mother of one of the victims.
What are the loudest [most ostentatious] personal experiences you or those closest to you have had with the impact of Islamization on your lives?
Unfortunately, those experiences could fill a whole book. I have written about some of these already on my blog. So, randomly…
Islamization directly affects many aspects of life, from shopping to picking schools. For example, when we were picking a school for our growing daughter, we were quite surprised. Not by the number of Muslim children in the classrooms, but with the attitude of the personnel. Everywhere, they welcomed us as foreigners, that they are proud of their institution, and proud of their multicultural approach. Then, when we toured the classrooms, every single notice-board was dedicated to the teachings of Islam.
We decided to sell our house in the city and to move to the countryside. There we finally found a traditional English school and community — exactly what we had wanted our daughter to still experience. This is a general trend: because of growing Islamization, many people are moving from the cities into the outlying regions.
We also had to solve a number of problems in the hospital — physicians and medics refuse to remove their headscarves upon entering the operating room, Muslim physicians leave their patients in order to go pray, demands for breaks for prayers, and so on. Just last week, our operating room nurses were complaining that one Muslim anaethesiologist, in the middle of a surgery, started reading out loud from the Koran and urged the rest of the personnel to also read from it. And I have to note that here, in the teaching hospital, this is much less pronounced than in a number of smaller hospitals. There, the situation is much worse.
And do fears of terrorism manifest themselves somehow?
The fear of Islamic terrorism is unpleasant and ever-present. Even MI5 admits that it is only a question of time before something happens. I remember how my friend, also a Czech doctor, phoned me in a panic when there was that terrorist attack at Glasgow airport. One of his colleagues, a Muslim physician at his hospital, was one of the perpetrators.
Publicly, nobody speaks about these problems openly: it is discussed only among good friends, behind closed doors. Criticizing Islam can easily be classified as fanning religious intolerance, and that is a criminal act in Britain. The situation is similar to what it had once been with any criticism of communism [behind the Iron Curtain]. Some negative manifestations were publically named, but they could not be connected to the cause. Open discussion existed only in private; public critics were punished.
How do the local media react, face to face, to this growing Islamization of Great Britain, whether it be the publically funded BBC or private outlets? From your previous answer, one may presume that instead of open transfer of information, they prefer political correctness, just as it is here as well as in most of the countries of the European Union.
No politician ever asked their electorate if they wanted the Islamization of their countries. When the majority culture, horrified, started to wake up, it was too late. Politicians cannot now ignore millions of their Muslim citizens, they have the same rights as non-Muslims. And they are voters. That is why it was necessary to create political correctness, as a tool to suppress criticism and cause the gradual erosion of the freedom of speech.
In the name of maintaining non-violent coexistence of different cultures, the politicians themselves have no choice, whether they like it or not, about aiding the peaceful Islamization of society.
The same goes for the media. On BBC, you can watch original shows about Muslims, or, perhaps, about how great it is to convert to Islam. The media carry information about current events — even about rapes, honour killings, female circumcision, terrorism — but nobody dares to link it with Islamic culture and its value system. They call it different things — the influence of a perverse ideology, extremism, radicalization — yet nobody dares to criticize Muslims. Even David Cameron says that these are “not Muslims, but monsters” — who have twisted and misused Islam. They never explain just how.
More and more, British Muslims are affecting the view of Britain on the international scene. The country that gave humanity democracy and the Beatles has thus become renown for its export of jihadists, who cut the heads off of living people.
Monday’s discussion in Parliament was symptomatic of this. The MPs had to debate barring Donald Trump from entering Britain — the subject of a petition signed by hundreds of thousands of British Muslims. One of my English colleagues told me yesterday just how ashamed he is of British image in the world. And it will get worse. As the Muslim community grows, it will promote its needs more vigorously.
That huge migration wave which rolled into Europe last year, according to the views of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, appears to be unstoppable. After the New Year’s attacks by hundreds of migrants on women and girls in Cologne-on-Rhine and also other and not just German cities, might the approach of the political elites [to the migrants] change? What reactions to these events have you noted in Great Britain?
German politics regarding the migration wave was perceived here with criticism. One could often hear the opinions that it is one-sided politics which endangers the stability of Europe. Information about the Cologne attacks was carried by all the major outlets, including airing the victims’ statements.
However, the news reporting was, of course, politically correct. I did not notice a single report where one of the commentators would draw an unequivocal link between the attacks and Muslim immigration. Nobody bothered to note that there might, perhaps, be some similarity to the thousands of attacks by Muslim men against English women.
If you have written off the future of Great Britain in light of the basic cultural and demographic change to the society and their vanishing identity, how do you see the chances of the continental countries of the European Union — primarily Germany and France, but, of course, also of the Czech Republic?
We do not experience the happenings in France as directly as we do those in England, even though we do go over to visit my sister-in-law and my niece is studying in high school there. However, I do think that France is about on par with England when it comes to Islamization. There is no good solution — either continuing Islamization or prolonged conflict.
What the politicians did in Germany — that is suicidal, dangerous and careless, both with respect to their own citizens and to surrounding countries. Who, in God’s name, have they taken counsel with regarding this decision? We will feel the results for a long time. And with the coming spring, the problem will return with a renewed intensity.
The European Union has failed. The Schengen area is crumbling; now it functions in reverse — its outer borders are porous, yet the internal borders between the States are being closed. There are very few reasons to think that the European Union will be able to deal as a united entity or defend itself as a whole. Protecting the integrity and security would appear to be more and more dependent on individual states.
Therefore the Czech Republic should not act as an afterthought to events, but should be prepared to take control of its borders at any time. In this context, the Visegrad area [Hungary, Slovakia, Poland and the Czech Republic] would appear to grow in importance. I think that the preservation of cultural identity and the prevention of Islamization lies in the close cooperation between these countries. It is quite possible that the tables will turn and that the bastion of democracy on the continent may, in the future, lie in Central Europe. Perhaps once the former inhabitants of Western countries will try to emigrate to us [Central Europe] just as once we had lined up to emigrate from there to escape totalitarian regimes. We tried out communism for them; they have tried out Islamization for us. We will be even. We must be ready to help them.
How can the citizens of the Czech Republic help ensure that their country will not follow in the footsteps of the Islamized Great Britain, and how should they face the accusations of xenophobia, Islamophobia and racism, to which they are subjected the moment they dare voice their disagreement with accepting migrants?
The only non-violent way to defend against Islamization is to not permit it to even start. To the West of us, we have plenty of case studies in how large Muslim migration changes society, how the formation of isolated ghettos came about along with a parallel value system. Therefore, preventing mass Muslim immigration and the creation of closed communities is the only protection from Islamization.
Of course, it makes no sense to hold a primary war against Islam. The primary thing should be the protection of our own values and way of life. Of course, not at the cost of closing ourselves to the world — that would be suicide. It is necessary to remain open and friendly to newcomers — to be attractive for those who want to accept our culture and its values, and wholly unaccepting of those who do not wish to respect this. Thus, the answer is a strong democracy, an open society that knows its values and knows how to use any means to protect them against those who either do not respect it or hate it.
That also goes regarding the freedom of speech. Political correctness is censorship, a barrier to freedom of expression, we should wholly reject it. If we do not call problems by their real names, we cannot solve them.
So, you do not see the worst of human qualities behind rejecting the migrants, as some ‘do-gooders’ would have us think?
Everyone has the right to voice their disagreement with accepting the migrants. The first concern of individuals must be their family, then surrounding area and then their country. If there exists strong proofs regarding negative impacts if immigration on safety, it is absolutely their place to worry about the effects of unchecked immigration. Anything else would be hazardous. There is no other way nature can work. If anyone calls well-supported fears xenophobia, we are dealing with implementing the principles of Political Correctness. Politeness, freedom, courage and truth — these are effective tools to fight Political Correctness.
Of course, I feel sorry for all those suffering from war. It is our moral duty to help those who need help, that is one of our core values. The more we help, the better the world around us will be and even we ourselves. Helping helps cultivate individuals and societies.
On the other hand, it is clear that we cannot help all those who need help. We can only help within the frame of our abilities and from our own free will. Helping at the cost of our own safety and integrity is suicide. Then, we will not be able to help anyone.
Of course, it also holds that helping does not mean moving everyone into your own home. It is possible to help the needy in many different ways.
If you follow the happenings on the Czech domestic scene, how would you comment the opinions of the President, Milos Zeman, with respect to the other side as represented by the Prime Minister, Bohuslav Sobotka, the defeated candidates of direct presidential election Karel Schwarzenberg and Jiri Dienstbiere, or the leader of the opposition, Miroslav Kalousek, on the migration wave to Europe? Does the President have the right to say that this is our country?
Of course, we follow domestic developments. Now, I do not want to address individual statements, there are so many of them and they are evolving so fast. However, I am afraid that the majority of our politicians still do not admit just how pivotal these times are in which we find ourselves. The current evolution of events will forever affect the shape of our country.
The politicians must defend the interests and safety of their own citizens; that is why they were elected and why we pay them. They must protect the country against dangers and risks, which also include uncontrolled immigration. Therefore, the [Czech] Republic must be ready to protect its borders. If it comes to the growth of the numerous Muslim community, Islamization will begin and there will be no way back. Such a basic decision regarding the mass immigration of an incompatible culture ought to remain under the overarching control of each member country. And they [the decisions] ought not be made by politicians elected for just a few years — this should be decided upon by citizens, in a referendum.
Yet there is something even more important here. The public and the politicians are facing a basic task — to guide the ship of democracy between the cliffs of Islamization on the one hand and fascism on the other. The longer politicians delay in naming things by their real names, the closer to these cliffs we will come. It is obvious that navigating between them will take effort and sacrifices. Let’s hope these will be just material sacrifices.
In order for people to be willing to give up parts of their comfort for the benefit of immaterial values and for future prosperity, they need motivation in the shape of political vision. We do not need politicians who are afraid or who are scaremongers. We need politicians who will inspire. We don’t need to say what kind of country we do not want, but rather what kind of a country we do want to live in — not showing people what to fight against but what to fight for. We need politicians who will give people a vision — “shared values, which are worth defending”.
And that even at the cost of more expensive gas and lowered pensions. If our culture is to survive, we have to define our values and protect them from all ideologies, which either do not respect or hate them. Already we have handed our country over without a fight twice — first to fascism, then to communism. Will we succeed in protecting it against Islam? I still believe that yes, we will.
And now for the consequences of Dr. Rogosov’s politically incorrect public candor. From The Star:
Sheffield Doctor Under Investigation for “Islamophobic’ Comments About Muslim Colleagues
A senior Sheffield doctor is under investigation for allegedly making ‘Islamophobic’ comments about Muslim colleagues.
A formal complaint has been made against Dr Vladislav Rogozov, a consultant cardiac anaesthetist for Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, following comments attributed to him on a Czech website.
Dr Rogozov is said to have claimed that “Muslim doctors regularly abandon their patients to go to pray’ and that a Muslim anaesthetist “was reading out from the Koran during an operation and was trying to persuade all the other staff to read along with him’.
A translated version of his interview quotes the doctor adding: “It must be noted that in our teaching hospital, this problem is much less pronounced than in many smaller hospitals. There it is even worse.”
In the interview, Dr Rogozov is also quoted as saying that “many places here look like the streets of Pakistan’ and that the “Islamisation’ of the UK “is already irreversible’.
The trust has confirmed it is investigating a complaint against Dr Rogozov that has been made by Dr Jan Culik, a senior lecturer in Czech studies at the University of Glasgow.
In his letter of complaint sent in January, Dr Culik said he believed Dr Rogozov, who has worked in Sheffield for ten years, has been making “biased, Islamophobic public statements’.
He said the comments “seem to be inappropriate from a professional point of view’ and has also highlighted a number of blog posts that appear to have been written by Dr Rogozov in which other comments relating to Muslims are made.
Dr Rogozov was not available for comment today.
Hat tip for the Star article: Seneca III.
Oh wonderful. A Czech grassing-up another Czech. Just like Poles grass-up their own newly-elected government to the EU… who needs PC thought-police when there are so many traitors? If Mr Culik wanted to make his thoughts known, he could have contacted Mr Rogozov directly. But instead – he grasses him up, so that Mr Rogozov is left to face the full fury of Britain’s political correctness… I hope he is happy with his rewards – maybe a promotion at his local university?
It’s safe to say Mr. Rogozov was aware Mr. Culik’s thoughts a long time ago. Jan Culik is not only a senior lecturer at the University of Glasgow, but also the owner and publisher of the rather notorious website “Britske Listy” (“The British Newspaper”, http://blisty.cz), originally an independent site promoting the exchange of ideas between British and Czech people. During last 2-3 years though, Britske Listy is dedicated almost exclusively to spouting Neomarxist propaganda, multicultural bias, rabid russophobia and pro-immigration opinions.
Culik often insists that Czechs would be much less “racist” if the world actually could understand what they’re saying, because they would be afraid of international disgrace (which only shows how little he actually understands Czech people). Trying to build further upon this idea, he started publishing slandering articles about Czechia in English language. Culik’s ratting on Mr. Rogozov is apparently the next stage of his slanderous project; hurting the whole country doesn’t work, so now he’s trying to hurt selected people.
Some suspect that Culik’s intentions are not entirely selfless, either. Czech studies at Glasgow University (which consists mostly of Culik being paid for lecturing a handful of people about a country nobody cares about) were in danger of being closed down. Should that ever happen, Culik would have to cease pub-crawling with Kundera fans, and get a real job instead. But then, one day, Culik started using his website as a propaganda funnel – and lo and behold, all of sudden, Czech studies were out of danger. 😉
Funny how the Culiks of this world are often so reliant on government funding? In Poland, we have our own Culiks getting much funding from the EU, Soros, and probably many other similar-minded people. A brand new very shiny, modern mosque has also just opened in Warsaw – although it’s funded by Saudis, so presumably it’s preaching the same 7th-century stuff as all the other less-swanky mosques. There’s a lot of money in promoting Islam or political correctness these days – while there’s not nearly so much money in promoting our own cultures. That IMO is our problem… But if the Culiks think that the only thing protecting our political incorrectness are our indecipherable languages, perhaps they’re forgetting another trait – that whereas Brits will often only talk about football, Eastern Europeans love to argue – especially about all the things that are taboo further West, like money-religion-politics? And if the truth doesn’t make itself known during the evening news on TV, surely it will come out after a few shots of vodka or glasses of beer? 🙂 besides – perhaps one feels less of a “disgrace” if one says something un-PC in Prague, Warsaw or Budapest than in London, Berlin or Sheffield? I suspect the Culiks of this world have their work cut out – especially given how things are likely to turn out in Western Europe over the next few years.
Poland stopped the Mongols from invading Europe in the 13th century and Poland stopped the Turks from invading Europe in the 17th century. Perhaps Poland will stop the current caliphate and save Western civilization again. I sincerely hope that you and your countrymen have the will to do it.
As you’re likely aware, this is exactly what happened back in 2011 and Dr Culik was front and centre with a megaphone extolling the virtues of his Slavonic studies. He even claimed that the university would become the laughing stock of the world should it dispose of his department – talk about self-serving!
This doctor has merely told the truth, only a factual account of what is happening in Britain, and not as extensive as some others could who have had even more contact with Islam.
Britain’s ruling elite still operate under the idiotic fantasy that we live in a multicultural society. They have imported Islam en masse without any thought into the consequences. British society has historically been forward thinking, liberal and integrates other cultures. We are quickly losing or have already lost our multicultural society. Multicultural society is not Islamic society as the doctor has already stated.
We also, as the doctor has pointed out, have almost certainly lost Britain. Our rosiest future would be to just hold onto our culture in some geographical areas; a Balkanised future. This is another own goal by our ruling elite, who have over two generations decimated our nation from a global superpower to a future as a Balkanised non entity where existential warfare is the legacy for our children.
Opening our nation to Islamic immigrants to solve a non existent demographic, potential problem was beyond stupid. A worse strategy could not have been implemented even if carefully thought out.
Btw, if anyone wants to make their thoughts known to the “grass” in question, contact details are below:
Dr Jan Culik
Senior Lecturer in Czech (School of Modern Languages and Cultures)
telephone: 01413305588
email: Jan.Culik@glasgow.ac.uk
R325 Level 3, Slavonic Studies, Hetherington Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ
http://www.gla.ac.uk/schools/mlc/staff/janculik/
But please – let’s keep any comments civil and polite. We don’t want to give him any ammunition against us, do we?
UN is the root of the problem. Either they should enforce distribution of all the refugees towards the 193 members states or enforce that refugees be housed in their region or continent. Wonder how much oil money went into the banks accounts of UN leaders.
Dr Rogozov’s opinions on medical issues have in the past been deemed worthy to quote on the BBC – on an article about the feats of his father, who removed his own appendix while on an expedition:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-32481442
Chapeau Dr Rogozov! If I replaced the word UK and the british cities with Sweden and swedish cities names in this article then I could say Dr Rogozov is describing the sad, rotten reality of Sweden, my country, I used to live in Göteborg but I decided to move when I failed to find a school for my daughters that wasn’t riddled with muslim students and forced muslim indoctrination. I am not complaining about the mere presence of muslim children in the school, I am complaining about the ways they act toward swedish children.
My 10 year old daughter told me her muslims schoolmates (boys and girls) called her a whore and accused her of not being virgin “just like all swedish women”; eventually she refused altogether to go to school.
Enough was enough, my husband and I decided to turn down our jobs, sell the house, the cars and move to the countryside, now we live in Älgarås, a small town with less than 500 inhabitants in east Sweden. We have found the peace we wanted here, I love this place, it’s a healthy enviroment and my children are happy, but I am not optimistic about the future of the country and I am afraid that the muslim invasion will eventually get here too.
Having experienced the wretched first hand, how are you and your family rising to this challenge? Do you speak with your children about the changes and the world lost to them? Is there a silent, tacit understanding between you about what has occurred? Is there a dialogue to prepare them for the future? Do you know where your new neighbours stand with respect to the developments in Sweden? I imagine the last has not been breached for fear of losing your jobs there…
Thank you. This is an important article. The writer points out some of the incompatibilities of Islamic culture.
May a small refinement be offered? He speaks of a “confrontation between two civilizations”. With great respect and gratitude for his article the confrontation is between a civilization and a 7th century culture.
Just to recapitulate the details:
Stonings, daughter-killings, beheadings,
amputations, sex-slave-taking, slavery,
female genital mutilation, forced child marriage at nine,
death for homosexuality, death for joining a different ideology,
approved vigilante killing,
no equality before the law,
no freedom of conscience,
no freedom of speech,
second class status for women,
breaking musical instruments, veto on art and sculpture?
That is not a civilization.
The main incompatibility of the Muslim is that he shines as a lazy dispairing vulture whose hatred for Christian is boundless. The Muslim belief that God is a butcher and the Devil is his hencheman should by now be coming through? Real western European unity is exchanged for a rotten failed Communust corpse.
And to think that this excellent interview would never have received coverage in English language media if Sheffield Hallam Hospital hadn’t suspended the surgeon. A very beneficial own goal.
Notice the headline: “Shocking words…..”.
It is as if the shock is the fact that he SPOKE it, not at the content of what he revealed. He has failed to observe the SILENCING DEVICE called political correctness. Therefore he is being pursued for the made-up “Islamophobia”, another SILENCING DEVICE.
In English law “discussion” and “criticism …of particular religions” is expressly protected. See the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006: 29J Protection of freedom of expression:
“Nothing in this Part shall be read or given effect in a way
which prohibits or restricts discussion, criticism or expressions
of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions….”
Under Cameron the law is not being upheld.
When the football fans came to the games with signs welcoming the refugees and the blog – “Untold Arsenal” put up an article stating how wonderful that brits are so generous, I pointed out that in other countries influx of refugees lead to increase in crime, rape in particular. I was promptly band from the site. That is how deep islamization in England has gone.
The Irish just elected a pro-moslem parliament. New MP celebrated his victory waving not the irish, but a palestinian flag.
Europe has submitted to islam, though moslem population is still small. People, who think the futur holds any hope, are not facing reality. It is going to be worse. It isn’t islam to blame, it is us, who are the traitors to our children.
It’s clear that there isn’t much work to do in the Glasgow department of Czech Studies. Dr Culik should butt out. But I bet he never sees a single Muslim in any of his classes. Don’t imagine Czech is high on their priorities.
Dr Rogozov gets lambasted and persecuted for merely telling the truth.England is therefore, officially a totalitarian Islamic hell hole.
Western Eurostan is a hell hole too. Soon mayhem will break out, civil unrest and authorities will run and hide like cowards which they are. There will be a sizable body count on both sides. Churches will be destroyed along with cultural and historical buildings, monuments., etc. Germany, some cafe’s have recently banned serving pork. Wonder if Octoberfest will be banned. Alpha men are few in number and it won’t be stopped.
How do we get interviews and information like this out to the general public? How do we show them the danger? How do we get them to listen? In Canada, the complacency is deplorable. Our prime minister is in the process of fast tracking our country towards Islamization. I don’t know the answer. I feel like a voice in the wilderness with my concern. But, we keep trying, because there is no other alternative.
Politicians in modern Britain fall into one of three categories.
1) Those who represent Islamicized communities, almost exclusively in urban areas. They know exactly what’s going on, but rely too heavily on the Muslim vote to do anything about it.
2) Those who represent rural communities. They may be aware of one or two token Muslims, but in the most part all they see is “England’s green and pleasant land”. They have no idea how bad it has become in many of our cities, and make no effort to see for themselves.
3) Those who make it their business to know what’s going on and want to make a difference. They are toxic to all of the major political parties, and politicians from the first two categories do their best to discredit anything they say.
Corbyn and the loony left fall into category 1. Cameron and his cronies fall into category 2. I can’t remember the last time I saw a hijab in Chipping Norton. Farage falls into category 3. Everything he says is common sense, and most everything he predicted years ago has come to pass. Sadly the electorate are too stupid or too blind to vote for the kind of people who could actually make a difference.
I become more convinced by the day that there really is a conspiracy to bring about a new world order by forcing diametrically opposed cultures together. At best this will lead to a complete loss of national identity, at worst it will result in civil war. We don’t want or need a United States of Europe, but that is where we’re heading.
A United Nations of Europe? Under certain conditions I would welcome it. One condition that would definitely make it unacceptable would be an “Islamic Nations of Europe”.
Polarization has caused self imposed apartheid in many cities , suburbs etc in Britain as well as mainland Europe . And since Germany is wielding the hammer over Italy and Greece , both are encouraging economic migrants to ” Go to Germany” , let them deal with it while the EU/Schengen disintegrates . By the time it has disintegrated, the borders will be shut and Germany will have a few million more immigrants which it wont be able to sustain and no other country will be willing to share its burden. It will still be a short while before the pressure cooker blows . Merkel welcome-s/d them with open arms and speaks, without consultation with the rest of the EU, that more are welcome, while imposing it upon other members to “share ” the burden as well as not to stop the influx into Europe, not now or later. Neither is there a quota whereby one can say enough, then maybe 100,000 per year, no, it’s infinite.
I believe its the European leaders aim to destroy the cultures, Christianity and cohesion by diluting it with Islam which is, by behaviour and commitment to their caliphatic cause, a strong means to do so without involving the government directly such as by means of the military etc. The police alone can do little since they are overwhelmed.
The intelligence organisations as well as the military can see it coming and it doesn’t look good. The greater the influx, the greater the instability and the security services won’t cope. What is the aim of the EU and its members to import 98 % unskilled, non-contributing, anti-Christian hate-filled souls? when before one had to have a desired high level skill to offer before being granted temporary residence and a work permit.
Sharia in practice! Thanks Dave!
It’s a pity that Great Britain doesn’t have free speech. I’d like to see someone try this stunt in the USA.
Or should I be careful what I wish for? I simply can’t see it happening here though.
“We tried out communism for them; they have tried out Islamization for us. We will be even. We must be ready to help them.”
Sad but one of the very apt statements he uttered in his long discourse. I recall the times in the 70’s and 80’s when people in the Czech Republic were punished for their anti-communist views by – firing from the work they did and positions they held (they were mostly intellectuals – university teachers, writers, artists).
Do I sense an threat of something similar from the article that appeared in The Star?
Lastly – we Czech have always had a “soft spot” for our fellow Europeans living outside of the Iron Curtain and enjoying their Western freedoms. Perhaps the pendulum of history – in his current dramatic swing – moves the heart of Western values, freedoms and liberties from the West to the East of the continent.
Very heart-wrenching but probably happening as we speak.
So, is Islam to blame for this state of things?
It is difficult to blame Islam for self-propagation; this is what it has always done and it has never attempted to hide it.
Exactly. Onde doesn’t blame the snake for exhibiting snake behavior. At the same time, one doesn’t import millions of snakes. Unless, of course, one is a member of the ruling class who plans to live where snakes are not allowed in.
Spot on.
I agree with every word he is saying. As a British citizen I also agree with his right to say it. I will not be shut up by PC. I too would like to know why my freedom of speech is being eroded. I don’t want to hurt or offensive d anyone but so many groups can offend me without punishment. As a white Indigenous woman living in the country she was born in where are my rights. Well done what a clever articulate article
I think this should be one of the strategies used – adopt the language of the oppressed. In this case calling oneself “indigenous” is appropriate. I suggest looking to Canada, Australia, NZ for examples on natives implementing their authority and mandatory respect from the greater society. It’s sad it’s come to this, but good luck.
Dr. Rogozov makes one of the most cogent, realistic evaluations of the Muslim/West relationship I have seen. It is sad the British cannot and will not defend themselves against the threat to their society.
It is equally sad that America cannot recognize the Muslim threat and act against it. But, we have prostituted our foreign and domestic policies for a long time. Between financial greed and a misguided guilt, western society around the world is forsaking its history, pride, patriotism, status, and its future.
-WestDivide
Hi,
I am confused by your saying America refuses to fight against islamization? I see the opposite with a lot of activism against refugee resettlement, islam in schools, etc. Donald Trump meteoric rise is very much due to his comments on immigration and specifically muslim immigration.
Respectfully
Thank you, Dr Rogozov, your courage is an inspiration – and these days, courage is what we in the UK must draw upon. The Visegrad countries may well give succor to many of ours who come after us, I have thought for some time that this will be the case. Your article is completely correct, in my personal opinion.
There is only submission to Allah or war. I have little faith that the majority of Westerners will not choose the former as they are oppressed by their PC governments as well as by the fear of Islamic violence, so the first target of attack is PC and its supporters.
The second line of attack is the ability of the average citizen to peacefully and verbally challenge Muslims in our daily lives without fear of prosecution, and INSIST that THEY follow OUR laws, not sharia!
*** Politicians cannot now ignore millions of their Muslim citizens, they have the same rights as non-Muslims. And they are voters. ***
Here is the crux of the issue. Nation states were formed when mass migration was not possible or not contemplated. Citizenship did go to foreigners but in very limited numbers. Flemish weavers added greatly to the wealth of East Anglia in the 17th century but Flemish enclaves do not exist there in our time, if they ever did. They were Europeans, contributors, and not hostile to the host country that welcomed them.
None of the American Founders or Ratifiers contemplated for a second that citizens of states from which issued the Barbary pirates would ever be fit subjects for naturalization. (The Chinese ambassador to the Court of St. James once spat on the carpet, which might have been noticed.) Nor did they contemplate that something other than that the religions of the United States would be European religions, namely the Christian or Jewish religions. They did not contemplate that such phenomena as Islam, santeria, or voodoo would come to our shores and be entitled to First Amendment protection.
Nor did the Drafters and Ratifiers in their wildest imaginings contemplate that the 14th Amendment would be interpreted to apply to other than newly-freed slaves or millions of foreigners choosing to enter any U.S. state or territory after walking over the border with Mexico.
Yet, as a result of acts of plain betrayal and manifestations of intellectual failure that beggar the imagination, practitioners of bizarre, primitive, and/or triumphalist cults are now set cheek by jowl with the jewels of our magnificent civilization. Any pregnant foreigner with the physical ability to step onto American soil can give birth to a “citizen.” Others who make their way illegally onto American soil can demand taxpayer funding for their education or the education of their children! Santeria practitioners can safely sacrifice chickens and leave chicken entrails outside Florida court buildings in the hope that proceedings there will go well for themselves. “Americanism” according to our Treason Class.
Western nations simply were not formed or operated to deal with the phenomenon of a massive alien presence and politicians have committed treason by falsely and knowingly applying doctrines of universalism and equality as though it were bedrock truth in 1734, 1813 or 1902 that Fijians, Mohammedans, Zulus, Chinese and Haitians were or could be interchangeable with Irish, Danish, German, American, Spanish, Dutch, and Poles.
Our ancestors dealt with military invasion and attack by Muslims, as well with as their raids to capture slaves that drove trade from the Mediterranean and made life in the Mediterranean world and on the coasts of northern Europe a nightmarish proposition for many infidels.
Mohammedism has changed not one iota since the 11th century and ever since it has locked the countries it has invaded into a civilization that would be farcical if it were not a horrible, retrograde tragedy. It is simply grotesque to proceed as though voting rights can safely be accorded to Muslims who have been allowed into Britain, as in this particular instance, to permit them to introduce their alien and repulsive values into a superior civilization, at least into a civilization that would be superior if only it could but reacquaint itself with the true meaning of “citizen” and “alien.”
In fact, we see in Britain there is no longer any concept of “native” or “loyal citizen.” Absurd concepts of “multiculturalism,” “diversity,” and “Islamophobia” have caused intelligent people to degrade themselves in a way that “pathetic” does not begin to describe.
The alien has subsumed everything in British public life and soon will do the same in all private life. And this is going on throughout the West.
Very well said.
Thank you kindly.
Probably because of the frequent use of the word Islamophobia in the UK Dr.Rogozov refers to the fear of Islamists .I object to the inference that British people are afraid,history shows that the British, when put to the test,show courage and tenacity in the most adverse situations.To describe what most British people feel about the Islamic infiltration would be better described as Islamodistrust (to coin a word)I think this matter is important because let no one think the British are afraid, because they are not, and they will act in their own defence when called upon.
I am so glad someone is saying that the British are not afraid. So often in comments both here and elsewhere I read that ‘the British’ are ‘allowing’ Islamisation through cowardice. Islamisation is here because the stupid political pygmies who are in charge have allowed and encouraged it. The British people believe in democracy -we invented it. So we believe in democratic ways to change what we don’t like. We thought that after years of socialist rule we should believe Dave (Camoron) who promised to reduce immigration to the 10s of 1000s. So we voted for him -( although I and over 4million others voted for UKIP). What a liar Cameron is – we now know that it is the despots in Brussels who have the say over our borders , who we can deport and so on. No democracy there. We are just waiting for the chance to vote in the referendum to get out of this cesspit before 77million more Muslims- Turks- are let in. Then we can turn our sights onto the Islamisation of our country.
As for groundswell of opinion, in my part of the UK (Kent) I hear frequent mutterings against the ‘Muzzies’ something I’ve never heard against the Indians or Sikhs or other immigrant communities who fitted in around our laws and culture. So believe me the anger is there and mounting. If push came to shove the working class would fight – they have the most to lose and the middle classes too. The biggest problem we face is for people here to get truthful unbiased information – our mainstream media is appalling- and to not be scared to voice opinions for fear of the heavy hand on the collar. I just pray that these traitors in Parliament won’t find some way to deny us our right to vote out of the fascist state that is the EU. It’s our first chance for freedom,control of our borders and perhaps afterwards for a change of government policy on appeasement to Muslims living here. I just wish we could flood The Tunnel
The doctor concludes, “If our culture is to survive, we have to define our values and protect them from all ideologies, which either do not respect or hate them.” But the only “value” he really points to is liberal freedom — and I don’t think that commitment to this this negative, content-less value can prevail against Islam’s horribly positive “values”. Perhaps the opponents of Islam should emphasize Europe’s love of beauty (a positive value) rather than its love of freedom (a negative value). A few days ago a poster of a red-high-heeled woman’s foot treading on a Koran was reproduced on this website. This sort of thing seems to present Europe with a choice between Europe and an especially obnoxious feminist expression of liberal freedom. This will not inspire European men to fight for Europe against Islam. But images of cathedrals, sculptures, paintings, and chamber-orchestras might.
Not just a patient’s health is at risk from a blood-spotted hijab. If a patient were to become infected and sue the hospital (a favoured course of action) the surgeon in charge would be held responsible. His career would be finished.
And yet the press and the DC controlled media pounds and vilifies Donald Trump for calling for a pause on Muslim immigration.
Fools.
Sheffield, btw, is right next to Rotherham – and has a lot larger Muslim population. (including a fanatical Muslim former boxing champion – Naseem Hamed).
So quite plausible that Dr Rogozov would have heard of (or even know) grooming victims, groomers – or just the “issues” caused by fundamentalist Muslims…
Two years ago a Rotherham couple with their toddler were kicked off a bus travelling from Sheffield for upsetting a moslem passenger. They were singing a child’s cartoon song Peppa Pig to their autistic daughter.
The company sided with the driver and I don’t think any kind of compensation took place to the couple and their small child kicked off two miles from their home.
Dr Rogozov has a blog, not very busy one, just a few posts in year. However, he has literal talent and this his texts sometimes make it into he local media. Rogozov definitely knows about the grooming, his most recent text was about this problem.
“on Christmas Eve, they did not lay Baby Jesus in the manger, but Baby Mohammed. I guess it no longer surprises me.”
Again, mohammedans copying Judeo Christian culture. So, now this is the new addition being implemented into the mohammedan copy “religion” narrative?
I follow many sites and am saddened by the acceptance that the UK is lost, that most European countries feel their heritage is lost. Political correctness seems to have cowed them, understandably,when they and their families are threatened . But…..the alternative is that Europe is being islamized and one the Visegrad seems willing to fight back. This fight will take men NEEDING to be men again, women standing as strong as men and not allowing their children to be used as pawns. All over Europe. Against the EU and the UN. Too many people have risen up the ladder go the detriment of the one on the rung below and now don’t want to give up their rung. What these very stupid people do not realize is that islam has now super ceded them…. And there is no rung but Islam. The Anglosphere once knew what it was and was proud of it and fought to win. Now, I am not so sure. What I do know in my very heart of hearts is that Donald Trump scares the pants off everyone in the Old Guard , everywhere around the world, that thought the rest of their lives would be easy. The don’t even say Islam. The Enemy. But it won’t. There will be no rest for the old guard while Donald Trump shakes it up. after he wins, he will point his finger atHillary and theOldGuard. and then he will take on ISIS and the danger of Islam. I fully believe that Trump understands the big picture scenario and plays chess whilst everyone else is to learn the rules of checkers.
This fight will take men NEEDING to be men again, women standing as strong as men and not allowing their children to be used as pawns.
I was surprised to learn that the hundreds (thousands over the years?) of girls who were victims of those grooming gangs in the UK were “in care”. Paul Weston mentioned it in passing in his talk at CPAC and my antennae went up. I’m reading “Easy Meat” but have haven’t yet got to that part, i.e., that these girls were – as we say in the U.S., in foster care. As soon as Mr. Weston pointed out that salient fact, it all made sense. I mean, how the victims could go missing without much being remarked upon, and what easy targets foster children are.
So first, families must be mended. And how does one do that in a hook-up culture?? Those social workers KNEW; they’re mandated to do child visits frequently – and obviously some weren’t bothering bec they have inhumane caseloads.
Ever since Mr. Weston said that, I’ve realized how hopeless it is. Those Muslim predators must be ROTFLTAO at the clueless infidels.
Children in UK are presented with sexual dilemmas from the age of 10 onwards, they are told (at school) that they can have ‘sex’ as soon as they feel ready for it (even though it is against the law). The predators wait at the school gates looking for the lonely unaccompanied ones, the good looking teens move in and chat them up, mostly those in care, but not always. But there is very little a parent in the UK can do since the child has ‘rights’ which the police and social services WILL enforce.
The victims have no defence, nothing to fall back on, their ‘private parts’ are now in the public domain, there is only one young vulnerable child to defend them, nobody else cares enough, one can protect the ‘white’ child and be accused of ‘racism’ and take the consequences, or look the other way and keep the job.
The police and social workers involved have beeen found out, but they are still working, and still getting a salary, and there is an awful lot of unemployment out there. So it is still best policy to let the ‘white priviliged’ child be exploited and just pretend not to ‘see’.
This is a direct result of radical feminist moral philosophy being mainstreamed. Any attempt by even a parent trying to keep even a young adolescent daughter out of trouble will immediately be pounced on by angry feminazis accusing them of trying to “control women”.
You can see this kind of stuff on Reddit, the cesspit of the Internet. I don’t go there anymore, but if anyone wants to know what the crazies are thinking then that’s the place. At least people are able to challenge the crazies to varying degrees (depending on the subreddit).
What I don’t get is: who let the crazies start teaching social workers?