28 thoughts on “One Country, Two Worlds”

1. So the Germans flinch from being called “Nazis” and are manipulated by Muslims in this way. In general, Westerners are manipulated by both political Leftists and Muslims who call them “Islamophobes” and “racists.” It appears that the mere name-calling is enough to make people knuckle under. The shadows of the past undermine the present in this way.

   How can this be handled? Obviously it would have been “unthinkable” for the principal to turn the argument around and say to the Muslim, “But it is you who are acting like a Nazi.” To say that would have been rude I suppose (of course we must always turn the other cheek?) and perhaps enough to get the principal fired from his job.

   This report is remarkable because people have been afraid to speak the truth.

   • And even more remarkable in the ZDF. I couldn’t stand how the middle-aged woman reporting just nervously giggled when the teens spouted their misogynist c**p. That sums it up nicely though: even when mainstream media Germans do see the problems, nervously giggling seems to be about the sum of their reaction.

     • I am German. I haven’t seen the programme and just browsed through the transcription. Of course all those problems exist and have to be addressed. What exactly does this mean though? Let all Muslim refugees rot and die somewhere else? If our country still adheres to christian values at all, caritas is one of them and it is much needed these days. That doesn’t mean we have to tolerate the suppression of women or even violence.
       Btw, ZDF is known to be the conservative of the two public channels in Germany so it’s not surprising that the programme was shown there. However, as I said, the problems do exist….

       • Your nation has a right to survive and thrive. Of what benefit will these ‘refugees’ be Germany and Germans? Do you have frontiers that need populating or industries crying out for their labor?

         That, not ‘compassion,’ should be the ONLY basis by which you judge whether or not you should admit these people to your country.

         In truth, you are creating a massive threat to the security of German citizens and terrible burden on the German taxpayer. You will regret admitting them to your country. They will not go home and they will [not] respect you, your nation, or your culture.

         • sorry. …will NOT respect your, your country, or your culture.

         • I already took the liberty of fixing it for you. 🙂

       • “Let all muslims die and rot somewhere else…..”
         What is it you don’t (will not) see?

         Every country which has let in muslims in the last 1400 years has become muslim, Germany will be no exception.

         Your Christian kind-heartedness will cost you your country–in my opinion; let’s see who is right in the next 10-20 years, shall we?

         • We don’t need to wait 10-20 years to see who will be proven correct. The evidence is there in abundance for anybody who cares to see it. Islam in Europe has already a created disastrous social and economic consequences: ubiquitous crime, welfare rorting, no-go-zones; parallel societies feeding off the host nations and with nothing but contempt for their host nations and their cultures.

       • The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

       • That’s odd — I don’t recall Jesus saying you must commit injustice against one neighbor to help another.

         German can rot so long as refugees are helped? That’s not very Christian. Also, once Germany and German culture has been destroyed (and it looks very likely at this rate), you will have destroyed your very means of helping others around the world. You will be begging the surviving Euro Countries for money and security — which is not a Christian virtue since your poor planning created the crisis.

         • I was recently discussing the question of Christian “selflessness” with a friend and he noted that the famous “love thy neighbour as thyself” is not “love thy neighbour MORE than thyself”. As you point out, if we do not look after ourselves first then how can we ever be in a position to assist others?

           I am reminded of the often-stated scenario of a lifeguard confronting a terrified and drowning individual: rescuers are told that when approaching such a person, it is imperative that they convince them to calm down and cooperate, before offering direct assistance. If they try to intervene while the individual is still thrashing about in a mindless panic, then they too will likely drown.

         • The Europeon Union for self assured destruction is nothing more or less than a huge Titanic. Ignorance in action. Just say you are Muslim and you can get away with all sorts of irrational illegal blood curdling crime against indigenous in particular and humanity in general and It should catch on soon.

   • Accusing Germans to be is an attack tactic, a debate stopper. The response would be “Did you know that the Gran Mufti of Jerusalem was a great friend and honoured guest of both Himmler and Hitler, and they plotted together another holocaust in the Middle East? Himmler is famous for saying “Islam is very similar to our ideology”. So it seems you are accusing us to be similar to you….” And if would also spell out some of the close similarities between the Nazi ideology and Islam: The one quasi-divine leader, the aim of world domination, by any means including violence, the hatred of Jews and the unequal treatment of women, the idea that Muslims are the “best of people” while all others are the “worst of ANIMALS”, as the Qur’an says.

     As always, those pointing a finger should realise that the other three fingers of the same hand point at themselves.

2. 01:55 Expressions were made that this was natural
   01:59 that Jews are the same as pigs, and if they were to draw a cross or even just look at a cross then they would lose
   02:04 their Islamic power. And I just can’t let such statement stand there. These are kids
   02:09 that one day will be adults.

   01:59 …then they would lose
   02:04 their Islamic power.

   What is this “Islamic power”?

   • Yes, I understand your question. Having lived most of my life in Switzerland, I know what he means.

     Muslims frequently use the term ‘islamic power’.

     It’s to be understood as a magical thing that they have been given by allah. It is what protects and shields them from the evil kuffar influence. They live in Germany, but they don’t consider themselves german, of course. As long as they are protected by their islamic power, they will be ok.

     For instance, should a child be forced to look at a cross, it might lose its power.

     In other words, this is yet another example of how superstitious these people really are. I’d wager to say, fundamental christians in the Bible Belt and crazy baptists speaking in tongues have nothing on these heathens.

     The crazy thing is how open they are about it.

     • I used to know someone who “felt the spirit of Satan” when he walked into an Indian grocery. This guy was Mormon but more importantly his IQ was about 70, so I wasn’t too surprised by his perception of “the spirit of satan” when faced with the unfamiliar especially if there was Hindu artwork and figurines around. Even he didn’t think he was going to lose his “Mormon power” or something over it.

       This is the first I’ve heard of the superstition about “Islamic power” but it doesn’t surprise me. And this is probably a phenomenon even with communal Muslims that would test as having average intelligence.

       • It doesn’t matter if the superstition is true… if the person believes it enough in their core to act with courage or conviction when it is activated they will overcome a person who has no “threshold”.

         Where most people in the West have gone wrong in the materialistic atheistic viewpoint is they completely forgot about the power of belief. They truly believed that material facts would protect them… but material facts do not protect your life when under threat from someone who truly believes a lie enough to ACT ON IT. Especially if the person from the west is incapable of acting due to fear of being materially wrong.

     • Thank you for a clear and simply explanation. The wording did seem to drift in that direction, but it seemed so far-fetched.

       Perhaps Ali Baba, et. al, would not be considered fairy tales.

3. This is truly Bizarro world.

   Muslim: “I want to kill all Jews”
   Non-Muslim: “No, that is terrible.”
   Muslim: “You are a Nazi!”

4. The overall message of this report seems to be that everything is just fine in Canada and that Germany just needs to emulate Canada. Apparently they forgot to take video of a citizenship ceremony with women wearing niqabs.

   So as usual the statists claim that some state reeducation program or something will solve all the issues.

   As honest as the report is about some things, it seems much less realistic about others.

5. The early exchange starting at 3:11 is very indicative of the gulf between people from the Middle East and western Europe, the respective irreconcilable reproductive strategies, i.e. mating, running in parallel and, when they intersect, in conflict, today.

   As with anything so basic to life in a biological organism these two reproductive strategies manifesting in Homo Sapiens have to have been passed down over millions of years from our species’ very first ancestors of the genus Homo which began diverging from genus Pan about 7M years ago, or even further back. The split is estimated to have been complete by about 4.5M years ago.

   Starting about 2M years ago the Pan genus split into Chimps and Bonobos, due to the Congo River separating the two, both poor swimmers, with the two species split by 1M years ago.

   This timing means that what differentiates Bonobos from Chimps must have been present, in a less developed form, in the ancestors of genus Homo, of which H Sapiens is the only species existing today.

   To a large degree that difference relates to reproductive strategies and sexual behaviors and the relative profile of Bonobo females compared with Chimp females. With Bonobos sexual behaviors are open and relaxed and open and as to females they tend to be in estrus longer than Chimp females plus tend to select their mates from the males. However with Chimps sexual behavior is more controlled and mating regulated to a degree by the strict hierarchy applying in the group, from dominant male down to the lowest male and then females having lower status than males.

   That little exchange starting at 3:11 shows these traits are both still operating, and today and now, thanks to multiculturalism, are clashing.

   As to clashing another difference is that Bonobo brains are said to have a more developed capacity for tolerance and empathy resulting in their males co-operating for the good of the group rather than competing for ‘top dog’ status as do male Chimps. Also this pre-disposes male Bonobos to be far less aggressive towards other groups of unrelated Bonobos than Chimps are, who will attack and attempt to kill outsiders – the brain structure difference enabling Bonobos to better regulate their emotional response to external stimuli than Chimps.

   Again this difference manifests within Homo Sapiens today.

   It used to be that Western European / Christian peoples kept Middle Eastern / Muslim peoples at a distance, helped to a large degree by the physical barriers of the Mediterranean and Black Seas as per the Congo River separating Chimp from Bonobo. But not in recent decades and it is getting worse and will continue to do so.

   • Ah. Did spell check but not grammar check 🙁

     • How about a reality check, Bronson? Many differences between the genders date back to our hunter-gatherer ancestors (evolution works much more slowly than many of us, especially feminists, would care to acknowledge). Alleged differences in relative intelligence between human populations may also be due to evolution/natural selection, stemming from the relative harshness of living conditions (I can hear Takuan agreeing with me!)

       BUT… Bonobos and chimps? I’d like to see your evidence for this being more influential than environment and upbringing. As the Jesuits said, give me the raising of the child, and I will answer for the opinion of the man. Which is why it is so important to insist on the (re)education and integration of existing migrants from other cultures, let alone the large numbers arriving now and imminently.

       • PS It is now known that the DNA of the two major groups of diaspora Jews, Sephardi and Ashkenazi, is still around 70% Semitic, after 1,900 years (and sometimes more) of exile. Yet following the European Enlightenment*, some Ashkenazi embraced secularism (and later, sometimes Marxism) while others retreated into the obscurantism, and self-imposed apartheid, of the Hassidim and ultra-orthodox. People can, and do, change.

         *Not strictly relevant, but as a fan of the composer Felix Mendelssohn, whose father converted and assimilated, I admire his grandfather Moses, a poor autodidact who became a distinguished philosopher, and a leading figure in the Jewish Enlightenment.

         • This [derogated information] won’t get ‘you’ very far in the upcoming ‘reality’ check. When the Muslim ‘refugees’ are making ‘their’ neighborhoods infidel free. Talking down to a devout Islamic savage doesn’t work. I thought we knew that by now. 911 etcetera and all that.

         • I read that it was about 50% for Ashkenazi Jews, not 70%.

6. Suse says asks what are Germans to do,
   “Let all Muslim refugees rot and die somewhere else? If our country still adheres to christian values at all, caritas is one of them and it is much needed these days.”

   Don’t you think Europeans should use a little discrimination? Does having “caritas” mean that you have to disconnect your brain from the rest of you? Most of the migrants are economic migrants and not refugees. There’s a big counterfeit business nowadays counterfeiting Syrian passports so that economic migrants can claim to be refugees from a war-torn country. In fact, these refugees come from all over the middle east, north Africa, sub-Saharan Africa and elsewhere.

   And by the way, although the media usually wants to show only the relatively few women and children, most of the migrants are men and most of those are young men (of fighting age).

   That doesn’t mean we have to tolerate the suppression of women or even violence.

   Suse says: “That doesn’t mean we have to tolerate the suppression of women or even violence.” You are tolerating it. And you are letting Muslims into your country in such numbers that you will not be able to prevent suppression of women and violence. You can’t even prevent it now, just in case you haven’t noticed.

   We humans have both a brain and heart. Use your brain!

7. The ‘gender…hunter gatherer ancestors ….dating back….’ that is.

Comments are closed.