[Updated 1/27/15 2:42pm to fill in the missing word “thousand” in “300 or 400 thousand arriving Muslims”]
Our Czech correspondent Gemini sends his translation of an
online article that quotes Robert Fico, the prime minister of Slovakia, during his recent appearance on a TV talk show. The translator includes this introductory note:
PM Fico is a former member of the Communist party of Czechoslovakia, and currently a devoted socialist. I guess his fascination with the state and its power is too obvious, even from this article. He surprised everyone, though, with those remarks about Islam.
The translated article:
Prime Minister Fico: We cannot tolerate the arrival of Muslims and the building of mosques!
When it comes to the fight against terrorism, countries ought to be passing laws, enabling them to get private information of dangerous persons. This results from the statements Prime Minister Robert Fico made while taking part on the Saturday talk show called Sobotné dialógy broadcast nationally. The prime minister pointed out that some countries in the world are passing special laws concerning the fight against terrorism which give more leeway to police. “Maybe the world or events would (eventually) press on us to set different rules for some group when it comes to privacy, telephones or bank accounts,” said Fico. He emphasized that it would relate only to an obvious state of national emergency. “If the danger in Europe increases, I thnik that this would be the simplest way to react. I’m not in favour of any torture, though. I opt for the access to information,” the prime minister added. Meanwhile, unless proved guilty, presumption of innocence should apply to everyone, and offices in charge of criminal prosecution should treat everyone equally.
Terrorism relates also to us
Concerning terror attacks in Europe he said that Slovakia cannot act as if this problem is not our concern. Also this is why nowadays dangerous persons are monitored much more carefully. “There are groups, foreigners, but also sometimes maybe even our citizens on our territory that act irrationaly, oddly, acting in a way that suspicions arise that in the future they might do something harmful to the country. In case anything like that happened, we put everything together in order to make Slovakia more prepared,” Fico stated. Nowadays, the Slovak intelligence service focuses much more on effective international cooperation, information exchange mostly.
Failed project of multiculturalism
Fico agrees with Miroslav Lajčák, the Slovak foreign minister, that the project of multiculturalism has failed. He claims that even though every decent person from the world is welcomed to Slovakia, he should, to a certain extent, respect the environment, values and rules, which are dominant in Slovakia. “Given that Slovakia is a country where the Catholic Church dominates, and the second largest is the Lutheran Church, then perhaps we could not easily tolerate that 300 or 400 thousand arriving Muslims would start building mosques and changing the nature, culture and values of the state,” explained Fico.
How dare he assert that his nation has a “nature, culture and values”!
Only Islamic states are allowed to have that in his region.
(Or ‘Hispanic’ states, mutatis mutandis, for the Americas.)
All indigenous cultures are sacrosanct… unless they happen to be Anglo-European.
Then the great multi-culti progressive Juggernaut must eliminate such unreconstructed bigots.
And make room for the “correct” natives.
Mr. Foco is correct, it has been said that a nation is defined by it’s borders, language, and culture.
Geez, when can I emigrate there!
Oh dear!
Bless you PM Fico. Your straight, courageous talk reminds us of real politicians who said something with meaning without equivocating.
Now we have the standard. Now we know the abject cowards who belong to Traitor Class and run traitorous “democracies”.
It is ironic that now “democracies” have to learn from other sources. Communism first started in Russian, and first died in Russia. Parliamentary system started first in Britain and first in Britain 40 years ago when jihadis were invited into British-church-turned mosques.
Saddam, Qaddafi, Shah were removed, nay, murdered because they were “bad dictators” no matter how many people warned against doing so. Only to be replaced by dictators and monsters raised to the power of ten. Dictator ^10.
Puzzling? How is this world working? I will not blame anyone who says it is run by satan.
Are Traitor Class satans incarnates?
Doesn’t conscience set humans apart from beasts?
The word “satanic” aptly describes the pointless slaughter of, and the regimes that came to life in, the last century.
As it describes as well the passivity of the Western people and our amazing susceptibility to fairy tales about the source of prosperity, the elements of civil society, the laws of arithmetic, and the nature of a savage, cunning enemy.
Even monumental greed and lust for power do not adequately explain the hatred Western elites have for their own people and their own ancestors.
Finally, is there a better way to understand how people who literally have access to the very best of what man has thought and created are instead fixated by base, trivial, primitive, and childish pursuits and ideas?
Even monumental greed and lust for power do not adequately explain the hatred Western elites have for their own people and their own ancestors.
I’m convinced they have adopted a “new” morality that they feel is legitimized by a combination of Malthusian pessimism and the Precautionary Principle. It’s not really new however. The West evolved away from such ancient pagan dead-enders. The Mayans, for one, apparently never evolved and suffered the consequences. The arrival of the conquistadors apparently kept the Aztecs from the same fate.
Misanthropes have always been around. And we usually mostly only had laughed at their eccentricity. But Malthus provided a cover for their distaste for humanity. No matter how often Malthus was proven to have underestimated human ingenuity, neo-Malthusians always came back to sell that snake-oil. I’m certain the very existence of the Progs is driven by it. As you say, the lust for money and power simply does not explain it. Misanthropy under guise of saving humanity from itself — that does explain it. Click web link.
That’s very insightful. The neo-Malthusian view is one I am familiar with but didn’t quite realize it. I mean that I’ve been around people who view the world’s population as a burden, even a curse, upon the earth and are devoted to contraception, abortion, population reduction (including euthanasia and limiting medical care). We all know of others who would be happy for man to be eliminated entirely, though not, presumably, the proponents of that idea. Those whom I have known personally, progs without a shadow of a doubt, have had chilling views on abortion and euthanasia, though they were clearly honest and kind people to people nearby by any measure.
The curse of the modern era is that people can drift up into the skies of ideology by adopting and savoring ideas that are completely divorced from practical consequences. Gone, too, is the influence of Rome or (and presumably cooler-headed) aristocrats. No idea in our time is too stupid to be adopted and institutionalized in our time.
The Soviets and Chicoms could casually speak of “liquidating the class enemy” and I suppose that this did not mark them in their circle as monsters.
Clearly, these neo-Malthusian ideas are monstrous in their application but, paradoxically, can be held by people who outwardly seem like normal people.
Multiculuralism, Marxism and neo-Malthusianism entail the elimination of people who stand in the way of earthly perfection — whites, the non-proletarian classes, and mankind itself in its most extreme form, respectively. Regardless of one’s personal fine qualities, to hold either of these views is to make one a monster when the balance finally comes to rest. No one who calls for the elimination of his fellow man can be called anything other than that.
Clearly, these neo-Malthusian ideas are monstrous in their application but, paradoxically, can be held by people who outwardly seem like normal people.
Yes. That’s true for a number of reasons.
First of all, the actual number of misanthropes remains a small number. It’s that their influence is much greater than their numbers.
The ones of which you speak are believers in that new (old) moral code. So they know they hold the moral high ground. Yes, our moral codes sees them as monsters. They see themselves as reluctant heroes to the cause of preserving humanity from the Malthusian inevitability. So of course they seem kindly. It also is deliberately disarming.
On our side with have two types. Those who have God and those who love our traditional culture. And that culture derives it’s mostly live and let live ethos from our religions that have a just and loving God. We have faith that either God or all that is in our nature, the wish to survive, will provide us our answers when we need them.
They are atheists — yes many have infiltrated the clergy too of course. So, in the absence of God, who will provide? The smartest amongst men of course. So if they figure they must act as God in deciding who lives and who must die, who are we to call them monsters? It’s a grim responsibility they have. And it is us who are heartless monsters to think poorly of them. See? Are you willing to get in their way and see how soon your number comes up?
Something like Mario Puzo’s “It’s just business; nothing personal.”
Additionally, why have these atheists promoted anti-theists? Because it won’t do to have much of mankind still thinking that there still is a Higher Authority than themselves. They can’t buck that competition. Nietzsche’s supermen need that God be dead. If not in fact, at least by tyrannical fiat. It’s well along accomplished. Let’s see how many churches not yet infiltrated survive their PC/Soviet-Style crackdown.
It’s nothing personal. It’s only business.
And one more thing. I can recall a debate I had with a Sierra Club official in the 1990s. He downplayed my concerns about where the “environmental” movement was headed. He said population reduction was preceding as planned, and that it would all be voluntary. He learned well, just as Margaret Sanger did nearly a century early, about downplaying the plans. ‘H. G. Wells and Population Control: From a Eugenic Public Policy to the Eugenics of Personal Choice.’ It was Wells who recognized that forced population reduction would meet resistance. Instead he argued it would be best to phrase it as a choice being denied instead. The man was a genius at understanding human nature. His sociopathic ploy has worked infamously. Yet somehow, even now, I can’t see him as the monster he is.
. . . adopted and institutionalized.
I work in Bratislava at the moment, I traveled here from war torn Sderot in August 2014, the difference was almost traumatic. When I first did a stint here (2012) I asked my (Slovakian) colleague where in Bratislava is ‘off limits’ to me (as a white Jew). His reply; “You are quite safe anywhere in Bratislava, indeed in the whole country”.
Islam is a tiny minority ‘religion’ here, because it is so small, its political ‘horns’ do not lock with those of the the local population, and the REAL peace, which stems from Judeo-Christianity, abounds.
This is an oasis in what is rapidly becoming a European (cultural) desert!
If one says jihadi beheaders and bloodshedders do that because they misunderstand their “peaceful religion”, that’s a FABRICATED WESTERN LIE. It only comes from dhimmis.
Have you ever heard a Traitor say any any wars or terror acts committed by “Christians” were against their religion. And then the Traitor would go on recite the beautiful words of the Lord’s Prayer, the Sermon on the Mount, love they neighbor as thy self, the Good Samaritan. If one asks you for your jacket, give him your shirt too.
And what is muslim prayer that they repeat five (5) times a day: Cursing “Hated” Jews, and “They gone astray” the Christians.
Why the British did not think of the Irish as neighbors, or the Germans of French as nice neighbors, and vice versa.
But today all of them die to have a muslim neighbor, and feel inconvenienced and irritated if the neighbor is Christian or Jew.
Traitor Class you need to be minuted.
The ” silent majority” of citizens of the aforementioned countries and every non-muslimislave of Satan country have not yet spoken. Any of the very few still sober muslims would be wise think that maybe he, she or it, has been sold a bill of goods by Mister oily gelt.
I would perhaps add some of Slovakia’s neighbours to that “desert”. Certainly in Poland it is very safe. And fewer “antifas” there than in Slovakia – where they mark their presence with stickers, even on the approach to Rysy mountain in the High Tatras.
Sounds very much like the leftist president of Slovakia’s next-door neighbour – the Czech Republic… if only Western Europe had “leftists” such as these, there would be no problems!
I taught in Slovakia in the late nineties. I had to get a full medical and an aids and hep B test before I went. When I arrived I had to report to the local police station to ‘registar’.The next day I went to a hospital to have my chest x-rayed for TB.Then I was allowed to stay. The town I was in Banska Bystrici had many nazis. Mainly youths. The general population hated gypsies. Believe me when I say that if muslims started to push their weight around in Slovakia they will be very sorry.The slovaks are not going to worry about the pc brigade.
PM Fico, re-appropriate the Christian faith. The Marx to whom you adhere even at this late date makes no sense without the teleological view of history bequeathed to our civilization by the prophets of Israel and carried on by such people as Augustine of Hippo. Marx’s fellow “atheist” Bertrand Russell once held that Marx’s thought includes a cosmic optimist which only Theism can justify.
How has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to non-Europeans? Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?
Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they victimize the host country’s people and trash up their land after they have been given a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? Your people? Your culture?
If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.
If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called “racist” and “Nazis” if they let them in their country will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country and it’s people? Wake up before it’s too late.
I was so happy to hear again from MC in sderot, he must always write to inform us. I always thought after the Velvet Revolution that the Czechs would be better off and maybe they are. But I am throwing my Canadian hat in the Slovak ring, they and their leaders seem to know what is right.