12 thoughts on “A War Zone in the Banlieues: Video”

1. Hermes does such good work. We wouldn’t have access to Eastern European information without him. This report, a Hungarian point of view regarding France’s no-go zones, is important because it fills in the spaces of [my] US-centric world view.It also doesn’t pretend to a bored, above-it-all style of ‘reportage’ sthat seems to be a requirement for our American jornolists-school po-mo irony.

   I hope some French readers are willing to comment on what the Hungarians filmed…

   Amazing to think that 10 thousand cameras are being used in an attempt to mobilize personnel to the hotspots…since those ‘spots’ have essentially moved beyond French laws, they are sovereignties unto themselves. I wonder if the political class is willing to just let any number of these places to be lost to France.

   I feel that way about large swathes of south Chicago, where criminals are carrying illegal guns quite openly in this city famous for its strict “gun control”. Detroit? Once the wonder of 20th century industry when parts of Japan lay in ruins. Yet now Japan flourishes while Detroit has been hollowed out by unions, politicians, and the burgeoning underclass – all of whom give NOTHING back.

   Just as the unions here have no interest in preserving a civil society, so it is in France for the immigrant class. In the latter, at least they are honest about their ends.

2. Well I live in France, and the public in the main are ignorant of the scale of the issue, as the authorities play it down. As I know Islam and how it destroys the host society I watch the signs carefully, a year ago some cultural enricher robbed a frozen food store near Marseille with an AK 47, from my prespective, that someone felt able to steal food with an assault weapon said its close to end game for France.

   We have on one hand the Interior Minister declare tougher sentences for people who attack police and on the other the Justice minister is letting them all out with bracelets on. Its a farce, but funny enough even though President Holland is a left wing idiot, I get the impression that he does have a negative attitude towards Islam, look at todays speach where he defends himself against Sarkozy for the intervention in Mali, pity he has not yet worked out that those issues exist in France!!!

3. It’s not just ‘open warfare’ in the ‘burbs we have to worry about, it’s how they deliver their agit-prop in schools. This is what’s been happening in a US school:-

   http://www.radicalislam.org/analysis/imam-preaches-armed-jihad-dc-high-school/#fm

4. Americans debate about the right to own “assault weapons”. Gun rights campaigners argue that real assault weapons are already out of reach to civilians, since they cannot buy automatic guns, only semi-automatics.

   In France, it is the police which are barred from accessing automatic-fire guns. A short while ago, a batch of powerful, AR-15 type weapons was purchased by the state, in order to help the police cope with the new generation of gangsters, who think nothing of bringing an AK-47 to a hairdresser’s hold-up.

   Those new police guns can normally switch from semi-automatic to full automatic. However, they were modified, in order to disable the automatic mode.

   This was done to protect policemen from prosecution, in case they have to shoot a criminal dead. When this happens, the officer usually has to defend himself in court, and prove that he fired in legitimate defence.

   But as soon as more than one shot was fired, the judges get very reluctant to rule that it was in legitimate defence. The more shots an officer fires in defence of his life or of other people’s, the more difficult for him it gets to escape prosecution for murder.

   Compare this with the standard training for American law-enforcement officers, who are routinely instructed that a single bullet is never enough to make sure that an armed criminal is stopped.

   Therefore, we have this absurd situation, where the French police bosses deliberately neuter their officers and knowledgely allow them to be under-gunned by criminals (who routinely have access to fully-automatic, military weapons), in order to protect their men from the French judiciary, and keep them out of jail.

   Oh, and by the way, you won’t find this interesting factoid mentioned anywhere in the media.

   I know it, because I stumbled across the video of a conference given by a lawyer, who specializes in the defence of policemen who had to shoot criminals. He mentioned it while explaining how restrictive the French courts were in recognizing legitimate defence — and that’s for police officers, never mind ordinary citizens.

   The obvious conclusion is that the leftist French judges are more of a menace to police officers than the criminals themselves.

   • Please tell us where this video can be found.

     • Here you are, Anonymous. (In French, obviously.)

5. I thought that female police chief in the video, Muriel Sobry, looked just a tad too exotic. Sure enough, Googling the name “Sobry” one finds a multitude of Muslims with that name:

   Mohammed Sobry

   Maksud Nama Hassan Sobry

   Syeb Sobry

   Che Sobry bin Abdullah

   Achmad Sobry Lubis — “the secretary general of a virulently anti-American jihadist group in Indonesia, the Islamic Defenders’ Front (FPI)”

   Sobry Agastha (his “likes” on his Facebook account include “Muhammad”)

   Azrul Affandi Sobry

   Muhammad Sobry Yaq’ub

   etc.

   In a story on Police Chief Muriel Sobry, I noticed she talked about all the challenges of various criminality on her job — with the conspicuous absence of any mention of Muslims or even North African immigrants.

6. What a nightmare. This is a culture coming apart at the seams.

7. Pingback: FW: More fFrom the ”OTT” Guy Leven-Torres who ”doesn’t think things through” and who ”rants” and is a fool…..And ”spreads lies and alarm” – Annette R.S. |

8. NAPOLEON Etl’ISLAM [1914]
   By Christian Cherfills

   FOREWORD TO THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION
   From a Secular & Judeo-Christian perspective their aversion to Islam is similar to their antipathy towards Napoleon and his anti-usury policies: On seeing the extent of French Indebtedness he declared “The deadly facts herein reveal, that it is amazing that this monster INTEREST has not devoured all humanity – It would have done so long ago had not BANKRUPTCY and REVOLUTION acted as counter poisons”; which explains his conversion to Islam along with that of General (Abdullah) Jaques Menou. Following which, the caricaturist, James Gillray, in London, depicts Napoleon wearing a turban with the caption reading: “Democratic Religion – Napoleon turning Turk.”

   As the prevailing accounts of history were authored by the victors of past disputes, it is often difficult, in some cases impossible, to discover where those conflicts (together with the ones of today), found their origins. Prompting Bonaparte, to remark that: “History is constructed from lies which are no longer contested [that] the police invent more than they discover; lies and inventions which continue to haunt us today. Napoleon’s conversion to Islam in 1798, followed his discoveries of how scriptures along with political accounts had been similarly falsified.

   Myths created by Britain’s black propaganda agency were comprehensively demolished by Jess McAJee, in the April 1996 edition of ‘Focus’ The Magazine of Discovery. Myth number one being that Napoleon was a foul despot who cared nothing for his people: “It is tempting to conclude” he says, “that seeing as Boney spent millions on the war effort, he did little for ordinary Frenchmen. One of the acts of his rule was to draw up a revolutionary constitution: three elected assemblies to vote in new laws, an independent court of appeal, and three consuls to be elected every three years. The constitution was even put to a national referendum – and approved by an astonishing majority of 3,011,007 votes to 1,562. Another lasting Napoleonic legacy is the Code Civil – also known as the Code Napoleon – still predominantly the law of France, Belgium and Luxembourg. The fundamentals it grants are equality under the law, the ending of feudal rights, the inviolability of property, the freedom of conscience, and the right to divorce. Napoleon inserted a clause obliging parents to feed children if required – even when they were adult. He was only just dissuaded from giving grandparents the right to protect grand children from parental abuse”. For Muslims this will come as no surprise when they realise that 96% of the Code-Civil i.e. The Code Napoleon is drawn entirely from Islamic jurisprudence based on the Fiqh/ rulings of Imam Malik. McAree states. “Nelson may have died a hero’s death at Trafalgar, but his victory set back European freedom a century, both he and Wellington were on the wrong side. By beating Napoleon, they denied the world the prosperity and political freedom it could have enjoyed under his rule.”
   PS: ISLAM IS THE SOLUTION TO THINGS LIKE LIBOR NOT THE PROBLEM.

   • What are you on Pidcock ? You are spouting [material which I find absurd and incredible].

9. We in Germany have the same problems – but German administration PROTECTS the Muslims – all crimes are censored and they even get away with murder : 7.500 people were killed by them since 1990 .

   You may not say a name in the press ( though everybody knows : no name = Muslim ! )

   And if you DEFEND yourself against them YOU get charged .

   and all this for Germany’s past !

Comments are closed.