“Deep Down, Muslims Feel That They Have Failed”

In the following interview from Der Spiegel, a Pakistani nuclear physicist gives a lucid account of the state of Islam in the 21st century. Notice that the interviewer is actually more Islam-friendly than his Muslim interlocutor.

Many thanks to Hermes for the translation:

Pakistani nuclear physicist: “Islamic Societies Have Collectively Failed”

There is a growing unrest in Islamic lands, and religious forces are gaining ground after the Arab revolution. The Pakistani nuclear physicist Pervez Hoodbhoy sees a “collective failure” of Muslim societies. He clarified his thesis during an interview with SPIEGEL ONLINE.

Students frolic around Pervez Hoodbhoy. They wear tunics and doctoral caps. The young women have simply put the caps on their headscarves. They have just learned that they have passed the examinations. Now they want to take a group photo of themselves with Hoodbhoy, their famous teacher.

Pervez Hoodbhoy, 62, is a nuclear physicist at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan. He has been teaching here since the ‘70s. He has studied and taught at renowned universities in USA and Europe. He has received awards for his scientific activities, and he has engaged in political issues through physics.

For example, he criticized the nuclear upgrading of Pakistan, which is a nuclear power, and the advance of religion in scientific, cultural and political sectors. With this attitude he has earned himself enemies in Pakistan, a country which is very proud of having an atomic bomb. A private university in Lahore has already fired him, and he has been waiting for months to collect his salary for his work in Islamabad.

Despite this, he says he has never thought of leaving Pakistan. Hoodbhoy was born Muslim, in an Ishmaelite family. He is hated by many, but secretly admired by others, and he does not want to be silenced. “I say what I think. And I provide a solid basis for it,” he says in his office, which he still has in the university where he has yet to receive his salary. Pictures of Japan in the aftermath of the dropping of the atomic bomb hang on the walls, and books on physics and politics are piled upon his desk.

Read in the interview why Pervez Hoodbhoy takes such a critical stance towards religion, and what he sees for the future of Islamic societies:

Spiegel:  Mr. Hoodbhoy, you regularly warn about the radicalization of Muslims. How exactly do you come to this position?
Hoodbhoy:  When I started teaching here at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad in the early ‘70s, there was only a single student in the entire campus wearing a burka. Today around 70 per cent of the women here are fully covered. Only 30 per cent go around normally.
Spiegel:  Do your students justify it? Or is that not an issue?
Hoodbhoy:  I ask them occasionally, and many of them say Islam requires it of them. Others say they wear a burka or hijab because most women here do. Others say they feel safer like that, because when they’re standing at the bus stop no one bothers them.
Spiegel:  So there’s no turning back to God or stricter interpretation of religion?
Hoodbhoy:  Yes there is. We are experiencing a huge cultural revolution in the Islamic world, not just in Pakistan, but in more or less every Islamic country. Pakistan is changing, Afghanistan has radicalized, Iran, Iraq, many countries in Africa and the Arabian world, Egypt, Algeria, now Mali. Sooner or later in Syria only veiled women will be seen. But let’s look at the Islamic communities in Europe or the USA — they are infected with the same virus. Why? I think people are noticing that they differ from others. A burka is essentially just a label to distance yourself from others. It says clearly: my identity is Islamic. This identity is closely linked to the feeling of being a victim of history. Deep down, Muslims feel that they have failed. This mix of sensitivities makes me afraid, because it leads to behavior that is very unhealthy.
Spiegel:  You view Muslim societies as having collectively failed. What do you mean by that?
Hoodbhoy:  There are around 1.5 billion Muslims in the entire world — but they cannot point to a substantial achievement in any field. Not in politics, not socially, not in the sciences or art or literature. The only thing they do with great devotion is fast and pray. But there are no efforts to improve conditions of life in Islamic societies. Unconsciously, people naturally feel this is a collective failure.
Spiegel:  Last time there was the so-called Arab Spring, where people — Muslims — fought for better living conditions.


Hoodbhoy:  The Arab spring was just an answer to autocratic systems and despotism, that is, to the factors which allowed the Arab world to sink into darkness. But the protests were not aimed at demanding a cultural or scientific renaissance. That is why not many changes are to be expected. A real liberation will only happen when the political changes are followed by cultural ones, and also by a change of attitude. Arab Muslims must get rid of the false but widespread belief that science contains any kind of religious elements. This Insh’allah mentality, according to which Allah is responsible for everything, is the opposite of the scientific way of thinking. Apart from this, the Arab working ethic is a bad one. There are always stops in order to comply with religious duties. In order to remain competitive in the modern world, things like punctuality and compliance with rules dictated by men, and not by Allah, must be dramatically improved.
Spiegel:  Do you actually receive threats because of statements like this?
Hoodbhoy:  Not threats, but they make life difficult for me. I’ve just been sacked from the Lahore University of Management Sciences, where I taught physics. That’s a very progressive private university, but in this society there are limits to what may be said. Even here in Islamabad life isn’t easy for me. Because I am a tenured professor, they can’t sack me. But I’ve haven’t been paid for months. I’m just sticking to the facts: what significant invention or discovery have Muslims made in the last thousand years? Electricity? Electromagnetic waves? Antibiotics? The combustion engine? Computers? No, nothing, at least nothing that makes for a modern civilization. And it’s the same now. And according to the religious fanatics, that also doesn’t matter. Their way of thinking is still that of the 12th century.
Spiegel:  There are really progressive Muslims, such ones who are secular and appreciate the modern world. And the majority of them are also rather moderate from a religious point of view. You are being unfair to them now.
Hoodbhoy:  Of course there were attempts by part of Islamic societies to become more modern, in the middle of the 20th century. Pakistan was a very modern idea when it was created in 1947. Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, all these were societies which looked at education and progress as something good. (But) all this is over. And this has many reasons. Arab nationalism failed. The Palestinians were kept down. And the West pursued its interests independently of positive developments in Islamic countries, for example regarding oil. If things go wrong, people turn to God.
Spiegel:  You say that this is already enough to ignite a radicalization?
Hoodbhoy:  For many Muslims, one question has not been addressed: why has our grandeur faded away? And the answer given to them by mullahs is the following: “Because you are not good Muslims! Pray! Fast! Cover your women! Think again about the interpretation you give to the Quran!” There is no way forward, and we are experiencing the results. In Pakistan, radical Sunnis kill Shi’ites on a daily basis just because they are seen as unbelievers.
Spiegel:  And what do you see as the right path in order to stop these developments?
Hoodbhoy:  Societies must have their bloody experiences. This is the way in which Europe turned secular. Earlier there were constant battles between Catholics and Protestants, and people came to their senses only after bloodsheds took place long enough. I fear that we are having just these horrendous experiences.
Spiegel:  In spite of this, now we must deal with radicals. What is your opinion about talking with the Taliban?
Hoodbhoy:  Those who are not ready to talk, but stick to violence, must be eliminated. Let’s look at the Taliban in Pakistan: they have two demands, namely that Pakistan cuts its links with the USA, and that sharia be introduced as the only one applicable law. They want no streets, no schools, and no work. They know no compromises. Of course that one cannot talk with them. We saw this in 2009 in the valley of Swat: the more concessions the Pakistani government made, the more they moved forward. One must tell them clearly: we negotiate with you only if you put down your guns. And because they will not do this, we must fight them. If one talks with the Taliban, this must happen only from a position of strength.
Spiegel:  So would the government have the backing of the population if it were to fight the Taliban?
Hoodbhoy:  When the question was raised in 2009 whether the army should enter into war with Taliban in Swat Valley, there was intense opposition from part of the population. But in spite of this, the army marched. The situation in Swat Valley with the Taliban is today visibly better than before. I believe that many do not like the army, but they like extremists even less. I am convinced that military actions are possible.
Spiegel:  How strong is the level of radicalization inside the Pakistani army, which has at its disposal the fastest growing nuclear arsenal in the world?
Hoodbhoy:  Regarding its composition, the army cannot be anything other than the society to which its members belong. Pakistani society has arranged a place for the Islamic agenda, and this is also valid for the army. That is why the military is facing huge problems. There are officials who consider themselves as a part of the Pakistani army. And there are officials who see themselves as part of the army of Islam. The civil sector inside the army views this with concern, but they have no answers to this challenge.

 

30 thoughts on ““Deep Down, Muslims Feel That They Have Failed”

  1. i think also, that islam is torn between modernisation and strict, conservative interpretation of the qur’an.
    islam is at war with its self. the internet, television etc. show the people just how badly islam and its leaders have failed them.
    the mullahs are fighting to retain control and we are getting the fall out.

  2. The cognitive dissonance in the Islamic world, and among muslim immigrants in the west, must be excruciating. They are raised to believe non-muslims are inferior, yet every day, from the moment they wake up, until the moment they go to sleep, they are touched by the brilliance of the non-mulsim world. Technology, medicine, transport – the list is literally endless. Unless they are hovering inside a personal force-field (If they get a personal force field at some point, it will probably be invented by an Israeli jew), and can magic food and water out of nothing, it’s unavoidable.

    Why did Allah make kafirs such high achievers, and muslims such miserable failures who have contributed nothing to the world, apart from killing people for 1400 years?

    But of course, I’m forgetting that killing 300m kafirs is classed as an achievement in Islam…

  3. I believe that the radicalisation since the 70′s in the Islamic world is directly linked to the emergence to cultural developments in the West evidenced by Relativism, Political Correctness, Hyper-Immigration, destruction of the family, and de-industrialisation. But these infections that have befallen Western societies, to quite possibly the point of irreversible decline, are themselves the logical consequence of a paradigm of collective guilt that has sprung out of the holocaust, slavery and colonialism.

    So, yes, Islamic societies have failed, despite the BBC feverishly trying to concoct evidence to the contrary; but in light of Western societies visibly collapsing within the living memory of WWII, Islam, the polio equivalent of socio-political ideologies can spread again.

    • these infections that have befallen Western societies, to quite possibly the point of irreversible decline, are themselves the logical consequence of a paradigm of collective guilt that has sprung out of the holocaust, slavery and colonialism.

      It’s more than that; the paradigm did not arise in the West, which fought to abolish slavery and against the architects of the Holocaust and freed all its colonies (contrast China).  The paradigm came out of the KGB, and acquired a life of its own in the Western left; see Yuri Bezmenov.

    • There is one and only one cause for the start of the radicalization of Islam in the 70′s and that is Saudi Arabia, the gulf statelets and the fact that oil went from $3 to $25 in 1973.

  4. I’ve been following Hoodboy’s story for some time. He must be remarkably charmed. Most in his position would have been assassinated long ago.

  5. Never mind that Islamic societies have failed, the system with them is seriously
    flawed from day one. Moslems suffer something like an incurable mental illness
    which the majority learn to live with, so much so that they are not even aware
    that they are taking the poison of Islam daily, hourly. Very, very few of them will EVER understand that they are ideologically contaminated [for life ]. Our problem is how to deal with the problems they inevitably cause us. There is only one solution
    and that is that Islam has to be dismantled and destroyed, whatever that entails.

    • Agreed.

      The problem, paradoxically, is that Islam is the product of Muslims and not that Muslims are products of Islam. Muslims were Muslims before Islam came on to the scene – they just didn’t call themselves that then.

      • Muslim is the one who HAS submitted to Muhammad and his Allah.
        Everyone believes in Allah – not everone is a Muslim with an entry permit to heaven unless he is a Muslim.
        Muslim without shahadah (Taking the name of paedophile Muhammad) is NOT a Muslim

        • Milad, not everyone believes in God or the afterlife, or even that the soul exists. Islam is a death cult which has achieved nothing in its 1400 year existence, nothing that is except pain, torture and death. Islam needs to be made illegal, closed down completely and destroyed.

          • I am a devote Catholic and have respected the religion of Islam in every way. They do not need to be wiped out, etc. They need to re-educate themselves on their religion and learn of the other religions in the world.

  6. Caliph Omar settled the science writings way back in 640 AD Alexandria : “they will either contradict the Koran, in which case they are heresy, or they will agree with it, so they are superfluous.”
    Superfluous means go ahead & burn anything from here to Timbucktu – except Koran
    in Arabic. The homicide bombings of heretic mosques blowing the Korans inside to shreds doesn’t enrage the faithful .

  7. George Will referred to the pathology of muslims as the “Culture of the revenge of failure”. He should not be ignored on this point.

  8. Don’t say muslims are poor inventors. Why, the other day Iran presented a newly – invented finger guillotine, to be used on thieves. “One small snip for a man…”

  9. Pingback: The Miserable Failure of Muslims « ACT! for America Houston

  10. I’m deeply grateful that Gates of Vienna exists to translate and post such an important interview with a Muslim scientist. His answers lucid and coherent. And pertinent and persuasive. The Pakistani professor deserves an international platform to spread his analysis of Islam and the societal backwardness it creates (and maintains) more widely. I’ve copied it to distribute to family and friends.

    The following “question” from the interviewer is what is known ironically in Australia as a “pearler” or a “corker” and tells you all you need to know about the MSM and the people who make a living in it. Congratulations to the professor for completely ignoring it, for I cannot:

    “There are really progressive Muslims, such ones who are secular and appreciate the modern world. And the majority of them are also rather moderate from a religious point of view. You are being unfair to them now.”

    Of course there is no question in there at all. Explicit or implied. Der Spiegel should reprimand the interviewer and retrain him. The first sentence is merely a statement of fatuous opinion – and I be grateful if the interviewer could point out in which country do we find a sizeable and vocal bloc of “really progressive Muslims”? Ditto the second sentence, though its an even more unsubstantiated opinion. The paradox is that the interviewee would be in a far better position to know whether the majority of Muslims are moderate. The third sentence is a childish accusation of personal misbehaviour an admonition plainly intended to rein in the interviewee, ie say nice things about Muslims otherwise you’re hurting their feelings and that’s a bad thing to do.

    I gradually stopped reading newspapers and watching television news 10-15 years ago because I can source my news and current affairs from selected websites such as GoV – which I visit almost daily – Brussels Journal, Steynonline, Fjordman (wherever you can find him), etc.

    What is truly fascinating is when I chance upon television news or a newspaper outside my home. The editorial perspective of the MSM, after a solid block of years away from it, is so extraordinarily ignorant and disturbingly lightweight – in fact, surreal – that the Orwellian term “prolefeed” springs to mind. For example, and the catalyst for my using this example is the Professor’s odd and discordant reference to “the Palestinians were kept down”, any coverage of Israel is predicated on several ahistorical and grossly erroneous core beliefs that simply do not square with informed reality:

    1. The Arab-Israeli conflict is a or the paramountly important human rights issue of our era;

    2. The so-called Palestinians are presented as a distinct ethnic group, a people, a nation which has been unjustly deprived of a state of its own;

    3. It is the business of the United States to bring about peace in the Middle East with a “two state” “solution” – the underlying assumptions being that peace is possible and a Palestinian state a good thing;

    4. Israel bears the blame for an eponymous Palestinian state never coming into being;

    5 Israelis building houses on undeveloped land in the West Bank is a crime against humanity and a threat to world peace.

    Back on topic, the Professor’s analysis of Islam and Muslim societies and polities makes for a very bleak prospect. The analogy with Europe having gone through centuries of Catholic-Protestant wars and the Islamic world being only at the beginning of this bloody process is a depressing but likely accurate one. I trust GoV will post more from Hoodbhoy.

  11. Good points Julius, I also gave up watching TV completely, but only 2 years ago.
    Just about the best thing I ever did. Now I can think so clearly, and with a max of a couple of hours on the Internet daily, so many things I never really thought about
    are at the forefront of my mind, and most of them I can understand. The Moslem scientist is an academic and is one in a million of that ideology who understands
    that Moslems are trapped in a system they cannot exit, and are so inured to it that
    any alternative is never going to enter their minds. Islam is just a cancer of the mind and most adherents live with it unconsciously. It is OUR problem.

  12. Pingback: A Pakistani Nuclear Physicist: “Deep Down, Muslims Feel That They Have Failed”: - No Compulsion

  13. Pingback: “Deep Down, Muslims Feel That They Have Failed” Hoodbhoy to Der Spiegel | The Muslim Times

  14. Pingback: Arab Peoples Are Heading Toward “Defeat, Decline, and Even Suicide” — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami

  15. Pingback: Islam is Evil - Page 5 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

  16. Pingback: Pervez Hoodbhoy: Secara Kolektif Islam Telah Gagal | Swara Kafir

  17. Pingback: Pervez Hoodbhoy: Secara Kolektif Islam Telah Gagal | Bacaan Mualaf

  18. It is more the failure of poor historical analysis and the use of binaries like Islam vs. science, religiosity vs. conservatism, and the confusion of categories like science and Islam that lies at the root of the current Muslim failure. Hoodbhoy is a complete charlatan. He has actually NEVER held more than a visiting research appointment at a leading western university. No physicist has heard of him. And his analysis of the Muslim situation is plain wrong. I recently saw him debate a prominent Berkeley professor, who completely revealed Hoodbhoy’s ignorance. It is on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th5JSZVWjKE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>